DesignWebs: Interactive organizational memory

DS 58-8: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 391-402

  Oberoi, Sharad V ^a   Finger, Susan ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design knowledge; Organizational memory

Indexed keywords

DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN TEAM; ORGANIZATIONAL MEMORY; SEMANTIC KNOWLEDGE;

SEMANTICS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84858851575     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (56)

1. Hult, G.T., An integration of thoughts on knowledge management, Decision Sciences, 34(2), pp, 189-195, 2003.
2. Leifer, L.J., "Instrumenting the design process," Proc. ICED'9I, Zurich, pp 301-310, 1991.
3. th International Conference on Networking entities (Neties '99), Donau-Universitat, Austria, 18-19 March, 1999.
4. El-Diraby, T. E., and Zhang, J., A semantic framework to support corporate memory management in building construction, Automation in Construction, 15, pp. 504-521, 2006.
5. Pedler M., Burgoyne J., and Boydell T., The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development, 1996. (McGraw-Hill)
6. Argyris, C, and Schon, D. A., Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, 1978. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA)
7. Berlin, L. M., Jeffries, R., O'Day, V. L., Paepcke, A., and Wharton, C, Where did you put it? Issues in the design and use of a group memory, Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 conference on Human factors in computing systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 23-30, 1993.
8. Sim, S. K., and Duffy, A. H. B., Evolving a model of learning in design, Research in Engineering Design, 15, pp. 40-61, 2004.
9. Day, C, Reflection: a necessary but not sufficient condition for professional development, British Educational Research Journal, 19(1), pp. 83-93, 1993.
10. Elton, L. and Pope, M., Research supervision - the value of collegiality, in O. Zuber-Skerritt (ed) Starting Research - Supervision and Training, 1989. (The Tertiary Education Institute, Brisbane)
11. Subrahmanian, E., Classification for communication and communication for classification in engineering design, In: Workshop on Classification Schemes in Cooperative Work at CSCW2000, eds. Schmidt, K., Simone, C, Star S. L., Philadelphia, 2000.
12. Finger, S., German, D., Fay, A., and Szczerban, M., Assessing collaborative learning in engineering design, International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), pp. 636-644, 2006a.
13. Finger, S., Gelman, D., Fay, A., Szczerban, M, Smailagic, A., and Siewiorek, D.P., Supporting collaborative learning in engineering design, International Journal of Expert Systems and Applications, 31(4), November, pp. 734-741, 2006b.
14. Halbwachs, M., Collective Memory, 1950 (Harper and Row, New York).
15. Roth, G., and Kleiner, A., Developing organizational memory through learning histories, Organizational Dynamics, 27, pp. 43-59, 1998.
16. Hedberg, B., How organizations learn and unlearn, in: P. Nystrom, W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, pp. 1-27, 1981 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York).
17. Walsh, J.P., andUngson, G.R., Organizational memory, Academy of Management Review, 16 (l),pp. 57-91, 1991.
18. Stein, E.W., and Zwass, V., Actualizing organizational memory with information systems, Information Systems Research, 6 (2), pp. 85-117, 1995.
19. Weiser, M., and Morrison, J., Project memory: information management for project teams, Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), pp. 149-166, 1998.
20. Hine, M.J., and Goul, M., The design, development, and validation of a knowledge-based organizational learning support system, Journal of Management Information Systems, 15 (2), pp. 119-152,1998.
21. Paul, S, Haseman, W.D., and Ramamurthy, K., Collective memory support and cognitive-conflict group decision-making: an experimental investigation, Decision Support Systems, 36, pp. 261-281, 2004.
22. Watts, S, Adoption of mediated knowledge in organizations: source credibility and information usefulness, Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1998.
23. Kwan, M., and Balasubramanian, P., KnowledgeScope: managing knowledge in context, Decision Support Systems, 35, pp. 467- 486, 2003.
24. Davenport, T., DeLong, D. and Beers, M., Successful knowledge management projects, Sloan Management Review, 39(2), pp 43-57, 1998.
25. Metaxiotis K., Ergazakis K., and Psarras J., Exploring the world of Knowledge Management: agreements and disagreements in the academic/practitioner community, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), pp 6-18, 2005.
26. Davis, J. G., Subrahmanian, E., Konda, S. L. Granger, H., Collins, M., and Westerberg, A. W., Creating shared information spaces for collaborative engineering design, Information Systems Frontier, 5(3), pp. 377-392, 2001.
27. Konda, S., Monarch, I, Sargent, P., and Subrahmanian, E., Shared memory in design: a unifying theme for research and practice, Research in Engineering Design, 4, pp. 23-42, 1992.
28. Westerberg, A. W., and the n-dim group, Distributed and collaborative computeraided environments in process engineering design. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems in Process Engng ISPE'95, AICHE Symposium Series No. 312, 1996.
29. Kunz, W., and Rittel, H., Issues as elements of information systems, Center for Planning and Development Research, Working Paper 131, Univ. Calif., Berkeley, CA, 1970.
30. Rittel, H.W.J., and Webber, M.M., Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sciences, 4, pp 155-169, 1973.
31. Radev, D. R. Blair-goldensohn, S., and Zhang, Z., Experiments in single and multidocument summarization using MEAD, In First Document Understanding Conference, 2001, Downloaded from http://perun.si.umich.edu/~radev/papers/duc01. ps on January 18, 2008.
32. Sahoo, N., Callan, J., Krishnan, R., Duncan, G., and Padman, R., Incremental hierarchical clustering of text documents. In: ACMCIKM, pp. 357-366, 2006. (ACM, New York)
33. Lamprier, S., Amghar, T., Levrat, B., and Saubion, F., Seggen: a genetic algorithm for linear text segmentation, In: Proceedings ofUCAI, pp. 1647-1652, 2007.
34. Arguello, J., and Rose, C. P., Museli: a multi-source evidence integration approach to topic segmentation of spontaneous dialogue, Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, New York, pp. 9-12, 2006.
35. Gallon, M., Courtial, J.P., and Laville, F., Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry, Scientometrics, 22(1), pp. 155-205,1991.
36. Chen, J. Q., Lee, T. E., Zhang, R. and Zhange, Y. J., Systems requirements for organizational learning, Communications of the ACM, 46(12), pp. 73-78, 2003.
37. Chung, Y. M., and Lee, J. Y., A corpus-based approach to comparative evaluation of statistical term association measures, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(4), pp. 283-296, 2001.
38. Foltz, P.W., Kintsch, W., and Landauer, T., The measurement of textual cohesion with latent semantic analysis, Discourse Processes, 25, pp. 285-307, 1998.
39. Liu, S., McMahon, C. A., Darlington, M.J., Culley, S.J., and Wild, P.J., An approach for document fragment retrieval and its formatting issue in engineering information management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3981, pp. 279-287,2006.
40. Shapiro, A., Method of animating transitions and stabilizing node motion during dynamic graph navigation, US Patent No. 20050180330, TouchGraph LLC, 21 Hearthstone Terr, Livingstone, NJ, US, 〈http://www.freepatentsonline.come/ 20050180330.html〉; http://sourceforge.net/projects/touchgraph, 2005.
41. Hearst, M., TextTiling: segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages, Computational Linguistics, 23(1), pp. 33-64, 1997.
42. Landauer, T.K., and Dumais, S. T., A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge, Psychological Review, 104, pp. 211-40, 1997.
43. Olney, A., and Cai, Z., An orthonormal basis for topic segmentation of tutorial dialogue, Proceedings of ILL T-EMNLP 2005, 2005.
44. Barzilay, R., and Lee, L., Catching the drift: probabilistic content models, with applications to generation and summarization, Proceedings of'HLT-NAACL 2004, 2004.
45. Kando, N., Text-level structure of research papers: Implications for text-based information processing systems. In Proceedings ofBCS-IRSG Colloquium, pp. 68-81, 1997.
46. Nanba, H., and Okumura, M., Towards multi-paper summarization using reference information. In Proceedings ofIJCAI-99, pp. 926-931, 1999.
47. Radev, D. R., Hovy, E., and McKeown, K., Introduction to the special issue on summarization. Computational Linguistics, 28(4), pp. 399-408, 2002.
48. Börner, K., Chen, C, and Boyack, K. W., Visualizing knowledge domains, Annu. Rev. Inform. Sci., 37, pp. 179-255, 2003.
49. Saltan, G., Yang, C, and Wong, A., A vector space model for automatic indexing, Communications of the ACM, 18(11), pp. 613-620, 1975.
50. Mostafa, J., Quiroga, L. M., and Palakal, M., Filtering medical documents using automated and human classification methods, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), pp. 1304-1318, 1998.
51. Krsul, I. V., Software Vulnerability Analysis, Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, 1998.
52. Coulter, N. Monarch, I., and Konda, S., Software engineering as seen through its research literature: a study in co-word analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), pp. 1206-1223, November 1998, 1998.
53. Alani, FL, Tgviztab: an ontology visualisation extension for protégé, Knowledge Capture 03-Workshop on Visualizing Information in Knowledge Engineering, ACM, Sanibel Island, FL, pp. 2-7, 2003.
54. Herman, I. Melancon, G., and Marshall, M.S., Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: a survey, IEEE Transactions on Visualisation and Computer Graphics, 6(1), pp. 24-43, 2000.
55. Wills, G.J., NicheWorks - interactive visualisation of very large graphs, Proc. Graph Drawing '97, Rome, Italy, Springer-Verlag, pp. 403-414, 1997.
56. Fredriksen, C, Learning to reason through discourse in a problem-based learning group, Discourse Processes, 27(2), pp 135-160, 1999.