Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective

Management and Organization Review

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 123-137

  Van de Ven, Andrew H ^a   Jing, Runtian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

China; Culture; Engaged scholarship; Indigenous research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858836638     PISSN: 17408776     EISSN: 17408784     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00281.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barney, J. B., and Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 15-28.
2. Boyer, E. 1996. The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1): 11-20.
3. Carlile, P. R. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5): 555-568.
4. Cheng, B. S. 1995a. The relationship between authoritarianism and leadership: Evidence from Taiwan. Research report for the project awarded by Taiwan's National Science Council. Taiwan: National Science Council. (In Chinese.)
5. Cheng, B. S. 1995b. Paternalistic authority and leadership: A case study of a Taiwanese CEO. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica, 79(1): 119-173. (In Chinese.)
6. Cheng, B. S., Wang, A. C., and Huang, M. P. 2009. The road more popular versus the road less travelled: An 'insider's' perspective of advancing Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 91-105.
7. DiMaggio, P. J. 1995. Comments on 'What theory is not'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3): 391-396.
8. Fang, T. 2012. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 25-50.
9. Farh, J. L., and Cheng, B. S. 2000. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui and E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context: 85-127. London: Macmillan.
10. Hofstede, G. 1994. Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40(1): 4-13.
11. Huff, A. S. 1999. Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Kenworthy-U'Ren, A. 2005. Toward a scholarship of engagement: A dialogue between Andy Van de Ven and Edward Zlotkowski (edited by A. Kenworthy-U'Ren). Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4: 355-362.
13. Leung, K. 2010. Beliefs in Chinese culture. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology: 221-240. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14. Leung, K., Li, P. P., Chen, C. C., and Luo, J. 2009. Call for papers: Management and Organization Review special issue on 'Indigenous management research in China. Management and Organization Review, 5(3): 431-432.
15. Li, P. P. 2011. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, DOI: 10.1007/510490-011-9250-2.
16. Ma, D. 2012. A relational view of organizational restructuring: The case of transitional China. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 51-75.
17. Pan, Y., Rowney, J. A., and Peterson, M. F. 2012. The structure of Chinese cultural tradition: An empirical study of business employees in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 77-95.
18. Pellegrini, E. K., and Scandura, T. A. 2008. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34: 566-593.
19. Redding, S. G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin, New York: W. de Gruyter.
20. Silin, R. H. 1976. Leadership and value: The organization of large-scale Taiwan enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
21. Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books Limited.
22. Stening, B. W., and Zhang, M. Y. 2007. Methodological problems confronted when conducting management research in China. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7(1): 121-142.
23. Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491-513.
24. Tsui, A. S. 2009. Editor's introduction - Autonomy of inquiry: Shaping the future of emerging scientific communities. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 1-14.
25. Van de Ven, A. H. 2002. 2001 Presidential address - Strategic directions for the Academy of Management: This academy is for you! Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 171-184.
26. Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Von Glinow, M. A., and Teagarden, M. B. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: Rigour and relevance redux. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 75-89.
28. Westwood, R. I., and Chan, A. 1992. Headship and leadership. In R. I. Westwood (Ed.), Organizational behavior- Southeast Asian perspectives: 118-143. Hong Kong: Longman.
29. Whetten, D. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29-55.
30. Wilson, S. 2008. Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
31. Wu, M., Huang, X., Li, C., and Liu, W. 2012. Perceived interactional justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 97-121.
32. Zhao, S., and Jiang, C. 2009. Learning by doing: Emerging paths of Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 107-119.