Tactile Sensibility of Single-Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 273-280

  Enkling, Norbert ^a   Heussner, Stefan ^b   Nicolay, Claudia ^b   Bayer, Stefan ^b   Mericske Stern, Regina ^a   Utz, Karl Heinz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Active tactile sensibility of dental implants; Interocclusal perception of teeth and implants; Osseoperception; Single blinded randomized clinical split mouth trial; Steepness of the sensibility curve; Support area; Tactile sensibility under anesthesia

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; ARTICAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; PLACEBO; ULTRACAINE D S; ULTRACAINE D-S; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INNERVATION; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MALE; MECHANORECEPTOR; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PERIODONTIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STIMULATION; TOOTH; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOUCH;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CARTICAINE; COHORT STUDIES; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; EPINEPHRINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MECHANORECEPTORS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIODONTIUM; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PLACEBOS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TOOTH; TOUCH; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858827716     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00252.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abarca M, van Steenberghe D, Malevez C, Jacobs R. The neurophysiology of osseointegrated oral implants. A clinically underestimated aspect. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33:161-169.
2. Batista M, Bonachela W, Soares J. Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:565-569.
3. Brånemark P-I. How the concept of osseoperception evolved. In: Jacobs R, ed. Osseoperception. Leuven: Catholic University Leuven, Department of Periodontology, 1998:43-46.
4. Klineberg I, Murray G. Osseoperception: sensory function and proprioception. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13:120-129.
5. Klineberg I, Calford MB, Dreher B, etal. A consensus statement on osseoperception. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2005; 32:145-146.
6. van Steenberghe D. From osseointegration to osseoperception. J Dent Res 2000; 79:1833-1837.
7. Ysander M, Branemark R, Olmarker K, Myers RR. Intramedullary osseointegration: development of a rodent model and study of histology and neuropeptide changes around titanium implants. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38:183-190.
8. Trulsson M. Sensory and motor function of teeth and dental implants: a basis for osseoperception. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2005; 32:119-122.
9. Wang Y-H, Kojo T, Ando H, etal. Nerve regeneration after implantation in peri-implant area. A histological study on different implant materials in dogs. In: Jacobs R, ed. Osseoperception. Leuven: Catholic University Leuven, Department of Periodontology, 1998:3-11.
10. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Role of periodontal ligament receptors in the tactile function of teeth: a review. J Periodont Res 1994; 29:153-167.
11. Mericske-Stern R, Hofmann J, Wedig A, Geering AH. In vivo measurements of maximal occlusal force and minimal pressure threshold on overdentures supported by implants or natural roots: a comparative study, Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8:641-649.
12. Jacobs R. Neurological versus psychophysical assessment of osseoperception. In: Jacobs R, ed. Osseoperception. Leuven: Catholic University Leuven, Department of Periodontology, 1998:75-88.
13. Utz K-H. Die taktile Feinsensibilität natürlicher Zähne. Eine klinisch-experimentelle Untersuchung. Medical dissertation, University of Bonn, Germany, 1982.
14. Enkling N, Nicolay C, Utz KH, Johren P, Wahl G, Mericske-Stern R. Tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants and natural teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:231-236.
15. Hämmerle CH, Wagner D, Brägger U, etal. Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995; 6:83-90.
16. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Comparison between implant-supported prostheses and teeth regarding passive threshold level. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8:549-554.
17. Keller D, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Thresholds for tactile sensitivity perceived with dental implants remain unchanged during a healing phase of 3 months. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996; 7:48-54.
18. Yoshida K. Tactile threshold for static and dynamic loads in tissue surrounding osseointegrated implants. In: Jacobs R, ed. Osseoperception. Leuven: Catholic University Leuven, Department of Periodontology, 1998:143-156.
19. Mühlbradt L, Ulrich R, Möhlmann H, Schmid H. Mechanoperception of natural teeth versus endosseous implants revealed by magnitude estimation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4:125-130.
20. Yamauchi M, Amano N. Tactile Sensibility of sapphire endosseus dental implants. Oral Health 1992; 82:23-30.
21. Van Loven K, Jacobs R, Swinnen A, Van Huffel S, Van Hees J, van Steenberghe D. Sensations and trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potentials elicited by electrical stimulation of endosseous oral implants in humans. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45:1083-1090.
22. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. From osseoperception to implant-mediated sensory-motor interactions and related clinical implications. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33:282-292.
23. Mericske-Stern R, Assal P, Mericske E, Bürgin W. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10:345-354.
24. Mühlbradt L, Meyle J, Lukas D, Schulte W. Die Tastsensibilität Tübinger Sofortimplantate. DtschZahnärztl Z 1980; 35:334-338.
25. Bonte B, van Steenberghe D. Masseteric post-stimulus EMG complex following mechanical stimulation of osseointegrated oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 1991; 18:221-229.
26. Lang NP, Wilson TG, Corbet EF. Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11 (Suppl 1):146-155.
27. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:567-572.
28. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, etal. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008; 17:5-15.
29. Schuirmann DL. On hypothesis testing to determine if the mean of a normal distribution is contained in a known interval (Abstract). Biometrics 1981; 37:617.
30. Westlake WJ. Bioequivalence testing - a need to rethink (Reader reaction response). Biometrics 1981; 37:580-594.
31. Kieser M, Hauschke D. Approximate sample sizes for testing hypotheses about the ratio and difference of two means. J Biopharm Stat 1999; 9:641-650.
32. Utz K-H. Untersuchung über die interokklusale taktile Feinsensibilität natürlicher Zähne mit Hilfe von Kupferfolien. DtschZahnärztl Z 1986; 41:1097-1100.
33. van Steenberghe D, Van der Glas HW, Grisar PR, Vandeputte KM. The effect of acoustic masking on the silent period in the masseter electromyogram in man during sustained isometric contraction. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 21:611-625.
34. Jacobs R, Schotte A, van Steenberghe D. Influence of temperature and foil hardness on interocclusal tactile threshold. J Periodont Res 1992; 27:581-587.
35. Mericske-Stern R. Oral tactile function in relation to other functions after rehabilitation with implant supported prostheses. In: Jacobs R, ed. Osseoperception. Leuven: Catholic University Leuven, Department of Periodontology, 1998:169-185.
36. Falmagne JC. Elements of psychophysical theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.
37. Manns AE, Garcia C, Miralles R, Bull R, Rocabado M. Blocking of periodontal afferents with anesthesia and its influence on elevator EMG activity. Cranio 1991; 9:212-219.
38. Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. J Endod 2008; 34:514-518.
39. Evans G, Nusstein J, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 2008; 34:389-393.
40. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study. J Endod 2006; 32:296-298.
41. Costa CG, Tortamano IP, Rocha RG, Francischone CE, Tortamano N. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration. Quintessence Int 2005; 36:197-201.
42. Hintze A, Paessler L. Comparative investigations on the efficacy of articaine 4% (epinephrine 1:200, 000) and articaine 2% (epinephrine 1:200, 000) in local infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry - a randomised double-blind study. Clin Oral Investig 2006; 10:145-150.
43. Robertson D, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M, McCartney M. The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138:1104-1112.
44. Vree TB, Gielen MJ. Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19:293-308.
45. Van der Glas HW, De Laat A, van Steenberghe D. Oral pressure receptors mediate a series of inhibitory and excitatory periods in the masseteric poststimulus electromyographic complex following tapping of a tooth in man. Brain Res 1985; 37:117-125.
46. van Steenberghe D. The role and function of periodontal neural receptors in man. Medical dissertation, University of Leuven, Leuven, 1979.
47. Morimoto T, Takebe H, Hamada T, Kawamura Y. Oral kinaesthesia in patients with Duibenne muscular dystrophy. J Neurol Sci 1981; 49:285-291.
48. Van Willigen JD, Broekhuysen ML. On the self-perception of jaw position in man. Archs Oral Biol 1983; 28:117-122.
49. Christensen LV, Levin AC. Periodontal discriminatory ability in human subjects with natural dentitions, overlay dentures and complete dentures. J Dent Ass S Afr 1976; 31:339-342.
50. Christensen LV, Morimoto T. Dimension discrimination at two different degrees of mouth opening and the effect of anaesthesia applied to the periodontal ligaments. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4:157-164.
51. Laine P, Siirilä HS. The effect of muscle function in discriminating thickness differences interocclusaly and the duration of the perceptive memory. Acta Odontol Scand 1976; 35:147-153.
52. Edel A, Willis DJA. Method of studying the effects of reduced alveolar support on the sensibility to axial force on the incisor teeth in humans. J Clin Periodontol 1975; 2:218.
53. Mela F, Pretti F. Tactile sensitivity of natural and artificial teeth. Minerva Stomatol 1965; 14:653-659.
54. Macefield VG. Physiological characteristics of low-threshold mechanoreceptors in joints, muscle and skin in human subjects. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2005; 32:135-144.