DRED 2.0: A method and tool for capture and communication of design knowledge deliberated in the creation of technical products

DS 58-6: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn 6, Issue PART 2, 2009, Pages 223-234

  Bracewell, Rob ^a   Gourtovaia, Marina ^a   Moss, Michael ^b   Knott, David ^b   Wallace, Ken ^a   Clarkson, P John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b ROLLS ROYCE PLC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Affordance; Concept map; Functional analysis diagram; IBIS; TRIZ

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE COMPANY; AFFORDANCES; COMPLEX DESIGNS; CONCEPT MAPS; DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN METHOD; DESIGN RATIONALE; ELEMENT TYPE; END USERS; GEOMETRY MODEL; GRAPH-BASED; IBIS; PILOT PROJECTS; SOLUTION APPROACH; TECHNICAL PRODUCTS; TRIZ;

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE TESTING;

DESIGN;

EID: 84858825999     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Maier J.R.A. and Fadel G.M. Affordance based design: a relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design, in press, DOI 10.1007/s00163-008- 0060-3.
2. Gaffney E.S., Maier J.R.A. and Fadel G.M. Roles of Function and Affordance in the Evolution of Artifacts. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED'07, Paris, France August 2007.
3. Gibson J.J. The theory of affordances. The ecological approach to visual perception. 1979 (Houghton Mifflin, Hopewell), pp.127-143.
4. Subrahmanian E., Konda, S.L., Levy, S.N., Reich, Y., Westerberg, A.W., and Monarch, I.A. Equations aren't Enough: Informal Modeling in Design. AI EDAM, 1993, 7(4), pp.257-274.
5. Kunz W. and Rittel H.W.J. Issues as elements of information systems. Working paper 131. Center for Planning and Development Research, Berkeley; 1970.
6. Bracewell R.H, Wallace K.M. Moss M., Knott D.S. Capturing design rationale Computer-Aided Design, in press, DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2008.10.005.
7. Subrahmanian E., Reich Y., Konda S.L., Dutoit A., Cunningham D., Patrick R., Thomas M., Westerberg A.W. The n-dim Approach to Creating Design Support Systems. In Proceedings of DETC/DTM1997, DTM-3873. 1997.
8. Cunningham D., Subrahmanian E. and Westerberg A. User-Centered Evolutionary Software Development Using Python and Java. In 6th International Python Conference, San Jose, October 1997, pp.1-9.
9. Himsolt M. Graphlet: Design and implementation of a graph editor. Softw. Practice Exp. 2000;30(11), pp.1303-24.
10. Maier, J.R.A. and Fadel, G.M. Affordance Based Design: Status and Promise. In IDRS'06, Seoul, South Korea, 2006.
11. Devoino I.G., Koshevoy O.E., Litvin S.S. and Tsourikov V. Computer Based System For Imaging And Analyzing An Engineering Object System And Indicating Values Of Specific Design Changes. United States Patent 6056428, filed 1997.
12. Novak J.D., Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 1990, 19(1) / January, pp.29-52.
13. Knott D.S. The Place of TRIZ in a Holistic Design Methodology. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2001, 10(2).
14. Bracewell R.H., Gourtovaia M., Wallace K.M. and Clarkson P.J. Extending Design Rationale to Capture an Integrated Design Information Space. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED'07, Paris, France August 2007.
15. Bracewell, R.H., Ahmed, S. and Wallace, K.M. DRed and Design Folders, a Way of Capturing, Storing and Passing on Knowledge Generated during Design Projects, ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2004, DETC2004-57165.
16. Szykman S., Sriram R.D., Regli W.C. The Role of Knowledge in Next-Generation Product Development Systems. ASME Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2001, 1(1), pp.3-11.
17. Borgo S., Carrara M., Garbacz P. and Vermaas P.E. A Formal Ontological Perspective on the Behaviors and Functions of Technical Artifacts. AI EDAM, 2009, 23(01), pp.3-21.
18. Kim K.-Y., Chin S., Kwon O. and Ellis R.D. Ontology-Based Modeling and Integration of Morphological Characteristics of Assembly Joints for Network-Based Collaborative Assembly Design. AI EDAM, 2009, 23(01), pp.71-88.
19. Kim, S., Bracewell, R.H. and Wallace, K.M. Answering Engineers' Questions Using Semantic Annotations. AI EDAM, 2007, 21(2), pp.155-171.
20. Himsolt M., GML: Graph Modelling Language. http://www.infosun.fmi.uni- passau.de/Graphlet/download/misc/GML.ps.gz, 1996.
21. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classdiagram
22. Bracewell R.H. and Wallace K.M. A Tool For Capturing Design Rationale. ICED'03, Stockholm, Sweden, August 2003.
23. Buckingham Shum S.J., Selvin A.M., Sierhuis M., Conklin J., Haley C.B. and Nuseibeh B. Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC. Rationale management in software engineering, 2006 (Springer-Verlag), pp.111-132.
24. Nelson T.H. Literary machines, 1981 (Swarthmore, Pennsylvania).
25. Nelson T.H. Xanalogical Structure, Needed Now More than Ever: Parallel Documents, Deep Links to Content, Deep Versioning and Deep Re-Use. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) Archive, 1999, 31(4).
26. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9629399/apdxa.htm
27. Pahl G., Beitz W., Wallace K.M., Feldhusen J., Blessing L.T.M., Grote K.H. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2007, (Springer).
28. Yourdon E., Modern Structured Analysis, 1989 (Prentice-Hall).
29. Cristiano J.J., Liker J.K. and White C.C. Customer-driven product development through Quality Function Deployment in the U.S and Japan. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2000, 17(4), pp.286-308.