Theoretical framework for comprehensive abstract prototyping methodology

ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 108-119

  Horváth, Imre ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Abstract prototyping methodology; Artifact service combination; Human actors; Information constructs; Narration and enactment; Stakeholder demands; Theoretical platform

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT PROTOTYPING METHODOLOGY; ARTIFACT-SERVICE COMBINATION; HUMAN ACTOR; INFORMATION CONSTRUCTS; NARRATION AND ENACTMENT; STAKEHOLDER DEMANDS; THEORETICAL PLATFORM;

COST ENGINEERING; DESIGN; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 84858815900     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Hardgrave, B. C. When to prototype: Decision variables used in industry, Information and Software Technology, 1995, 37(2), 113-118.
2. Chua, C. K. Three-dimensional rapid prototyping technologies and key development areas, Computing and Control Engineering Journal, 1994, 5(4), 200-206.
3. Wang, G. G. Definition and review of virtual prototyping, Journal of Computers and Information Science in Engineering, 2002, 2(3), 232-236.
4. Horváth, I., Gerritsen, B. and Rusák, Z. A new look at virtual engineering, in: Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Conference, Budapest, 2010, 1-10.
5. Opiyo, E. Z., Facilitating the development of design support software by abstract prototyping, Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2003, 1-206.
6. Gielingh W., Cognitive product development: A method for continuous improvement of products and processes, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, Vol. 1, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2008, 25-37.
7. Wood, D. P. and Kang, K. C., A classification and bibliography of software prototyping, Technical Report CMU/SEI-92-TR-13, ESD-92-TR-013, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1992, 1-86.
8. Rich, C. and Feldman Y. A., Seven layers of knowledge representation and reasoning in support of software development, IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 1992, 18(6), 451-469.
9. Hickey, A. and Dean, D. Prototyping for requirements elicitation and validation: A participative prototype evaluation methodology, in: Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 1998), 1998, 797-800.
10. Cooprider, J. G. and Henderson, J. C. Technology-process fit: Perspectives on achieving prototyping effectiveness, Journal of Management Information Systems, 1991, 7(3), 67-87.
11. Constantine, L. and Lockwood, L. Software for use: A practical guide to the models and methods of usage-centered design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1999, 1-12.
12. Chalasani, P., Jha, S. and Sullivan, K. The options approach to software prototyping decisions, Technical Report CMU-CS-97-161, SCS, Carnegie Mellon University, 1977, 1-27.
13. Shao, G. and Hanna, W. Soft prototyping in the design of military electronics, in Proceedings of the IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference '90; Dayton, OH, 1990, 729-735.
14. Karat, J. and Karat, C. M. The evolution of user-centered focus in the human computer interaction field, IBM Systems Journal, 2003, 42(4), 532-541.
15. Phalp, K. and Counsell, S. Coupling trends in industrial prototyping roles: An empirical investigation, Software Quality Journal, 2001, 9(4), 223-240. (Pubitemid 33695923)
16. Kordon F. and Luqi, X. An introduction to rapid system prototyping, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2002, 28(9), pp. 817-821. (Pubitemid 35242626)
17. Vasconcelos, W., Robertson, D., Sierra, C., Esteva, M., Sabater, J. and Wooldridge, M. Rapid prototyping of large multi-agent systems through logic programming, Kluwer, Amsterdam, 2003.
18. Buchenrieder, K. Rapid prototyping of embedded hardware/software systems, Design Automation for Embedded Systems, 2002, 5, 215-221.
19. Ham, D.-H., Wong, W. and Amaldi, P. Comparison of three methods for analyzing human work - in terms of design approaches, in: Proceedings of the Workshop Describing Users in Context - Perspectives on Human-Work Interaction - INTERACT 2005, Rome, Italy, 2005, 7-11.
20. Reichart, D., Forbrig, P., Dittmar, A. Task models as basis for requirements engineering and software execution, in: Proceedings of Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design Conference, 2004, pp. 51-58.
21. Constantine, L. Canonical abstract prototypes for abstract visual and interaction design, in: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems, LNCS 2844, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003, pp. 1-15.
22. Constantine, L., Windl, H., Noble, J. and Lockwood, L. From abstraction to realization: Canonical abstract prototypes for user interface design, Working Paper, Version 2.0, Constantine & Lockwood, Ltd., 2003, 1-12.
23. Campos, P. F. and Nunes, N. J. Canon Sketch: A user-centered tool for canonical abstract prototyping, in: Proceedings of EHCI-DSVIS 2004, LNCS 3425, 2005, pp. 146-163. (Pubitemid 41251974)
24. Nóbrega, L., Nunes, N. J. and Coelho, H. DialogSketch: Dynamics of the canonical prototypes, in: Proceedings of Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design Conference, Gdansk, Poland, 2005, 26-27.
25. Mikkelson, N. and Lee, W. O. Incorporating user archetypes into scenarios-based design, in: Proceedings of the UPA 2000 - Designing the New Millennium Today, 2000, Asheville, N.C.
26. Nielsen, L. From user to character: An investigation into user-descriptions in scenarios, in: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, London, 2002, 99-104.
27. da Cruz, A. M. R. and Faria, J. P. Automatic generation of user interface models and prototypes from domain and use case models, in User Interfaces, Intech, Vukovar, 2010, 35-60.
28. Liu, Y. H., Osvalder A.-L. and Karlsson, M. A. Considering the importance of user profiles in interface design, in User Interfaces, Intech, Vukovar, Croatia, 2010, 61-80.
29. Mikovec, Z., Maly, I., Slavik, P. and Curin, J. Visualization of users' activities in a specific environment, in: Proceedings of Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, 2007, 738-746.
30. Clerckx, T., Winters, F. and Coninx, K. Tool support for designing context sensitive user interfaces using a model-based approach, in: Proceedings of Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design Conference, Gdansk, Poland, 2005, 11-18.
31. Yu, L. Prototyping, domain specific language, and testing, Engineering Letters, 2008, 16(1), 1-6.
32. Nilsson, E. G., Flocha, J., Hallsteinsena, S. and Stava, E. Model-based user interface adaptation, Computers & Graphics, 2006, 30(5), 692-701. (Pubitemid 44573394)
33. Memmel, T. and Reiterer, H. Model-based and prototyping-driven user interface specification to support collaboration and creativity, J. of Universal Computer Science, 2008, 14(19), 3217-3235.