New laboratory procedures and Rh blood type changes in a pregnant woman

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 119, Issue 2 PART 2, 2012, Pages 426-428

  Sandler, S Gerald ^a   Li, Wenping ^a   Langeberg, Al ^a   Landy, Helain J ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RHESUS D ANTIBODY; RHESUS D ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; BLOOD DONOR; BLOOD GROUP RH; BLOOD GROUP TYPING; CASE REPORT; COOMBS TEST; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS IMMUNIZATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; BLOOD GROUP RHESUS SYSTEM; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; IMMUNOLOGY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; RHESUS ISOIMMUNIZATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOLOGIC TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, HEMATOLOGIC; RH ISOIMMUNIZATION; RH-HR BLOOD-GROUP SYSTEM; RHO(D) IMMUNE GLOBULIN;

EID: 84858788119     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823f6f76     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. nded. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing; 2002. p. 210.
2. Cannon M, Pierce R, Taber EB, Shucker J. Fatal hydrops fetalis caused by anti-D in a mother with partial D. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1143-5. (Pubitemid 37357077)
3. Garratty G. Do we need to be more concerned about weak D antigens? Transfusion 2005;45:1547-51.
4. Lubenko A, Contreras M, Habash J. Should anti-Rh immunoglobulin be given to D variant women? Br J Haematol 1989;72:429-33. (Pubitemid 19180055)
5. th ed. Bethesda (MD): AABB; 2011. p. 43.
6. th ed. Bethesda (MD): AABB; 2008. p. 631.