Flexible integration testing of automotive ECUs by combining AUTOSAR and XCP

ICCAIE 2011 - 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 67-72

  Caliebe, Philipp ^a   Lauer, Christoph ^a   German, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

acceptance test; analysis; automotive application; AUTOSAR; component integration; debug interface; embedded systems; measurement; real time; software development; XCP

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS; AUTOSAR; COMPONENT INTEGRATION; REAL-TIME; XCP;

ACCEPTANCE TESTS; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS; INTEGRATION; MEASUREMENTS; SAFETY TESTING; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STANDARDS;

SOFTWARE TESTING;

EID: 84858777592     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162106     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. AUTOSAR, AUTOSAR Standard: Methodology, AUTOSAR GbR, Aug. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://autosar.org/download/R3.1/AUTOSAR Methodology.pdf
2. B. Broekman and E. Notenboom, Testing embedded software. Addison- Wesley Professional, 2003.
3. J. Callahan, F. Schneider, and S. Easterbrook, "Automated software testing using model-checking," in Proceedings 1996 SPIN workshop, vol. 353. Citeseer, 1996.
4. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/DIS 26262 (2010). Road vehicles - Functional safety. Draft international standard. http://www.iso.org, 2010.
5. H. Kopetz, R. Obermaisser, C. El Salloum, and B. Huber, Eds., Automotive Software Development for a Multi-Core System-on-a-Chip, 2007.
6. J. Wegener, K. Grimm, M. Grochtmann, H. Sthamer, and B. Jones, "Systematic testing of real-time systems," in 4th International Conference on Software Testing Analysis and Review (EuroSTAR 96). Citeseer, 1996.
7. A. Bertolino, "Software testing for dependability assessment," in Objective Software Quality, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, P. Nesi, Ed. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 1995, vol. 926, pp. 236-248. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59449-3 36
8. P. Lanigan, P. Narasimhan, and T. Fuhrman, Eds., Experiences with a CANoe-based fault injection framework for AUTOSAR, 2010.
9. M. M. Tikir and J. K. Hollingsworth, "Efficient instrumentation for code coverage testing," in ISSTA '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2002, pp. 86-96.
10. E. Kuzara, A. Blasciak, and G. Parets, "System for analyzing and debugging embedded software through dynamic and interactive use of code markers," Sep. 12 1995, uS Patent 5,450,586.
11. AUTOSAR, AUTOSAR Standard: Specification of Timing Extentions, AUTOSAR GbR, Nov. 2009. [Online]. Available: http://autosar.org/download/R4.0/AUTOSAR TPS TimingExtensions.pdf
12. K. Richter, "The autosar timing model - status and challenges -," in ISOLA '06: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2006, pp. 9-10.
13. W. Scḧutz, "Fundamental issues in testing distributed real-time systems," Real-Time Systems, vol. 7, pp. 129-157, 1994. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01088802
14. N. Nethercote, "Dynamic binary analysis and instrumentation," Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK, 2004.
15. J. Arlat, A. Costes, Y. Crouzet, J. Laprie, and D. Powell, "Fault injection and dependability evaluation of fault-tolerant systems," IEEE Transactions on Computers, pp. 913-923, 1993.
16. J. Arlat, Y. Crouzet, J. Karlsson, P. Folkesson, E. Fuchs, and G. H. Leber, "Comparison of physical and software-implemented fault injection techniques," IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 52, pp. 1115-1133, 2003.