KETO: A knowledge editing tool for encoding condition - Action guidelines into clinical DSSs

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7208 LNAI, Issue PART 1, 2012, Pages 352-364

  Minutolo, Aniello ^a,b   Esposito, Massimo ^a   De Pietro, Giuseppe ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES PARTHENOPE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Clinical DSS; Knowledge Base Editor; Ontology; Rules

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; CLINICAL DSS; CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES; CLINICAL PROBLEMS; EDITING TOOLS; IF-THEN RULES; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SETTINGS; REPRESENTATION TECHNIQUES; RULES; USER-FRIENDLY TOOL;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MAINTAINABILITY; ONTOLOGY;

ENCODING (SYMBOLS);

EID: 84858773499     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28942-2_32     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Woolf, S.: Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine: II. methods of developing guidelines. Archives of Internal Medicine 152(5), 946-952 (1992)
2. Scott, I.: What are the most effective strategies for improving quality and safety of health care? Internal Medicine Journal 39(6), 389-400 (2009)
3. Shortliffe, E., Cimino, J.: Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine. Springer, New York (2006)
4. Linder, J.A., Ma, J., Bates, D.W., Middleton, B., Stafford, R.S.: Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Archives of I. M, pp. 1400-1405 (2007)
5. Himmelstein, D.U., Wright, A., Woolhandler, S.: Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: a national study. American Journal of Medicine 123(1), 40-46 (2010)
6. Niemi, K., Geary, S., Quinn, B., Larrabee, M., Brown, K.: Implementation and evaluation of electronic clinical decision support for compliance with pneumonia and heart failure quality indicators. American J. of Health-System Pharmacy 66(4), 389-397 (2009)
7. Brokel, J., Shaw, M., Nicholson, C.: Expert clinical rules automate steps in delivering evidence-based care in the electronic health record. C. Inf. Nursing 24(4), 196-205 (2006)
8. Shiffman, R.: Representation of clinical practice guidelines in conventional and augmented decision tables. J. of the American Medical Informatics Association 4(5), 382-393 (1997)
9. Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., et al.: Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J. of the American Medical Informatics Assoc. 10(1), 52-68 (2003)
10. Colantonio, S., De Pietro, G., Esposito, M., Machì, A., Martinelli, M., Salvetti, O.: Decision Support for the Remote Management of Chronic Patients. In: Proc. of the 2nd Internat. ICST Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare, Kos Island, Greece (2011)
11. Colantonio, S., De Pietro, G., Esposito, M., Machì, A., Martinelli, M., Salvetti, O.: Knowledge Based Decision Support For The Management Of Chronic Patients. In: Proc. of the Int. Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Paris, France (2011)
12. Minutolo, A., Esposito, M., De Pietro, G.: A Mobile Reasoning System for Supporting the Monitoring of Chronic Diseases. In: Proc. of the 2nd International ICST Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare, Kos Island, Greece (2011)
13. Shahar, Y., Young, O., Shalom, E., Galperin, M., Mayaffit, A., Moskovitch, R., Hessing, A.: A framework for a distributed, hybrid, multiple-ontology clinical-guideline library, and automated guideline-support tools. J. of Biomedical Informatics 37(5), 325-344 (2004)
14. Duftschmid, G., Miksch, S.: Knowledge-based verification of clinical guidelines by detection of anomalies. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 22(1), 23-41 (2001)
15. Cooke, N.J.: Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. I. J. of HC Studies 41, 801-849
16. Escórcio, L., Cardoso, J.: Editing Tools for Ontology Construction. Semantic Web Services: Theory, Tools and Applications. Idea Group
17. Gómez-Pérez, A., Ortiz-Rodriguez, F., Villazón- Terrazas, B.: Ontological Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
18. Garcia-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, M.A., Sanchez-Alonso, S.: Usability evaluation of ontology editors. Knowledge Organization 32(1), 1-9 (2005)
19. Corchado, E., Graña, M., Wozniak, M.: New trends and applications on hybrid artificial intelligence systems. Neurocomputing 75(1), 61-63 (2012)
20. Corchado, E., Abraham, A., Carvalho, A.: Hybrid intelligent algorithms and applications. Information Sciences 180(14), 2633-2634 (2010)
21. Straszecka, E.: Medical Knowledge Representation in Terms of IF-THEN Rules and the Dempster-Shafer Theory. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, 1056-1061 (2004)
22. OWL2 (Web Ontology Language), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/
23. Carroll, J.J., Dickinson, I., Dollin, C., Reynolds, D., Seaborne, A., Wilkinson, K.: Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations. In: Proc. of the 13th Internat. World Wide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers & Posters, New York, USA, pp. 74-83 (2004)
24. MacKay, D.: Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press (2003)
25. Minutolo, A., Sannino, G., Esposito, M., De Pietro, G.: A rule-based mHealth system for cardiac monitoring. Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES), 144-149 (2010)