Determinants of cross‐border commuting: Do cross‐border commuters within the household matter?

Journal of Borderlands Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 97-112

  Gottholmseder, Georg ^a   Theurl, Engelbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858772063     PISSN: 08865655     EISSN: 21591229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2007.9695679     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Clark, W. A. V., Huang, Y., and Withers, S., 2003. Does Commuting Distance Matter? Commuting Tolerance and Residential Change. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(2): 199–221.
2. Hansen, C.L., and Nahrstedt, B., 2000. “ Cross‐Border Commuting: Research Issues, and a Case Study for the Danish–German Border Region ”. In Borders, Regions and People, Edited by: Velde, M. van der, and Houtum, H. van. 69–84. London: Pion.
3. Hazans, M., 2003. “ Commuting in the Baltic States: Patterns, Determinants, and Gains ”. Working Paper B02/2003 Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung. Bonn.
4. Hitzelsberger, F., Biebl, I., and Reuter, J., 2002. Machbarkeitsstudie für die Schaffung einer EURES Grenzpartnerschaft zur Abdeckung der Regionen Liechtenstein (LI), Graubünden, St. Gallen, Schaffhausen, Thurgau, Appenzell Ausserrhoden, Appenzell Innerrhoden, Zürcih (CH), Vorarlberg (AT) und Teile von Baden‐Württemberg und Bayern (DE), Munich: MKW GmbH.
5. Janssen, M., 1999. “ Obstacles and Willingness for Cross‐Border Mobility: The Dutch‐German Border Region ”. In Understanding European Cross‐Border Labour Markets, Issues in Economic Cross‐Border Relations, Edited by: Gijsel, P. de, Janssen, M., Wenzel, H.J., and Woltering, M., 143–164. Marburg: Metropolis.
6. Janssen, M. 2000. “ Borders and Labour‐market Integration: Where is the Difference between Interregional and Cross‐Border Mobility? ”. In Borders, Regions and People, Edited by: Velde, M. van der, and Houtum, H. van. 47–68. London: Pion.
7. Madden, J.F., 1981. Why Women Work Closer to Home. Urban Studies, 18(2): 181–194.
8. Rouwendal, J., 1994. Changes in Commuting Distances of Dutch Households. Urban Studies, 31(9): 1545–1557.
9. Rouwendal, J. 1999. Spatial job search and commuting distances. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29(4): 491–517.
10. Rouwendal, J., and Meijer, E., 2001. Preferences for Housing, Jobs, and Commuting: A Mixed Logit Analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 41(3): 475–505.
11. Schulz, J., 2005. “ Grenzgänger in der EUREGIO‐Bodensee ”. In EURES Bodensee www.jobs‐ohnegrenzen.org. (cited November 25, 2005)
12. Studer, L., 2004. “ Analyse der Arbeitsmärkte und Arbeitskräftewanderungen im Fürstentum Liechtenstein und in Vorarlberg ”. In Veröffentlichungen des Ludwig Boltzmann Instituts für sozialwissenschaftliche Regionalforschung, Edited by: Niederstätter, A., and Stöckler, E., Regensburg. Iss. 3
13. Van der Velde, M., Janssen, M., and Houtum, M. van. 2004. The threshold of indifference; rethinking immobility in explaining cross‐border labour mobility. Review of Regional Research, 24(1): 39–49.
14. Van der Velde, M. Labour Market in a Border Region–Searching for jobs and the influence of borders. Paper prepared for the 38th European Congress of the European Regional Science Association. Vienna, Austria.
15. Van der Velde, M. 1999. “ Searching for Jobs in a Border‐Area: The Influence of Borders in a Dutch Euregion ”. In Understanding European Cross‐Border Labour Markets, Issues in Economic Cross‐ Border Relation, Edited by: Gijsel, P. de, Janssen, M., Wenzel, H.J., and Woltering, M., 165–181. Marburg: Metropolis.
16. Van Houtum, H., 1998. The Development of Cross‐Border Economic Relations., Center for Economic Research Tilburg University.
17. Van Houtum, H. 2000. An Overview of European Geographical Research on Borders and Border Regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 1(Spring): 57–83.
18. Van Ommeren, J., Rietveld, P., and Nijkamp, P., 1997. Commuting: In Search of Jobs and Residences. Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3): 402–421.
19. Van Ommeren, J., 1998. On‐the‐job Search Behavior: The Importance of Commuting Time. Land Economics, 47(4): 526–540.