Understanding neighbourhood character: The case of Camberwell

Australian Planner

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 32-39

  Dovey, Kim ^a   Woodcock, Ian ^a   Wood, Stephen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858763431     PISSN: 07293682     EISSN: 21506841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2009.10753406     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Birrell, B, O'Connor, K, Rapson, V and Healy, E. (2005) Melbourne 2030. Planning rhetoric versus urban reality, Melbourne: Monash University ePress.
2. Bishop, B. & Syme, G. (1995) The social costs and benefits of urban consolidation, journal of Economic Psychology 16, 223-245.
3. Boroondara City Council, (1996) Residential Urban Character Study, Consultant's report by Urban Initiatives, Neighbourhood Character Area 104, accessed via website May 2005.
4. Bunker, R., Gleeson, B, Holloway, D. and Randolph, B. (2002) The Local Impacts of Urban Consolidation in Sydney, Urban Policy and Research, 20: 2, 143-167.
5. Camberweii/Hawthorn Planning Watch Inc. (1988) Concept Plan for Redevelopment of Camberwell Railway Station Site, limited publication, p. 8.
6. Davidson, G. (1997) Suburban Character, People and Place, 74, 26-9.
7. Dovey, K. (2009) Becoming Places, (London: Routledge, in press).
8. Dovey, K, Wood, S. & Woodcock, I. (2008) 'Sense of Urban Character', in Van clay, F. et al. (eds)Making Sense of Place, Canberra National Museum of Australia, pp. 229-38.
9. Dovey, K, Woodcock, I. & Wood, S (2006) 'Contradictory Characters', in Anderson, K. et al. (eds)After Sprawl Post-Suburban Sydney, Conference Proceedings, Centre for Cultural Research, University of Western Sydney. Website Publication: www uws edu. au/research/research ce n tres/cc r/pub I i cation s#5.
10. Gleeson, B. (2005) Towards a New Australian Suburbanism, U DIA Queensland 2005 Conference Port Douglas, Brisbane Griffith University.
11. Gleeson, B(2006)Australian Heartlands (Crows Nest Allen & Unwin).
12. Hall, P. (1997) The Future of the Metropolis and its Form, Regional Studies, 31: 3, 211-220.
13. Huxley, M. (2002) 'This Suburb Is of Value to the Whole of Melbourne'-Save Our Suburbs and the Struggle Against Inappropriate Development, Institute for Social Research Working Papers No. 6, Hawthorn, Vic: Swinburne University .
14. Jenks, M, Burton, E. and Williams, K. (Eds) (1996) The Compact City A Sustainable Urban Form? (London: E. & FN. Spon).
15. Jenks, M. & Dempsey, N. (2005) Future Forms and Design for Sustainable Cities, (Oxford: Architectural Press).
16. Lewis, M. (1999) Suburban Backlash.-the battle for the world's most liveable city, (Melbourne: Bloomings).
17. Moriarty, P. (2002) Environmental Sustainability of Large Australian Cities, Urban Policy and Research, 203, 233-244.
18. Newman, P & Kenworthy, j (1989) Cities and Automobile Dependence, (Aidershot Gower).
19. Newman P & Kenworthy, j. (1999) Sustainabilityand Cities, (Washington DC Island Press).
20. O'Connor, K. (1998) Understanding Metropolitan Melbourne. without being confused by coffee and doughnuts, Urban Policy and Research, 16 2, 139-145.
21. O'Connor, K. (2003) Melbourne 2030: A Response, Urban Policy and Research, 21: 2, 211-215.
22. Randolph, B. (2006) Delivering the Compact City in Australia: Current Trends and Future Implications, Urban Policy and Research, 24: 4, 473-490.
23. Searle, G. (2003) The Limits to Urban Consolidation, Urban Frontiers Program Issues Paper No. 14, Sydney: University of Western Sydney.
24. Troy, P (1996) The Perils of Urban Consolidation (Sydney Foundation Press).
25. Wood, S, Woodcock, I. & Dovey, K. (2006) 'Contesting Characters at Hedgeley Dene', in Sasson, S. (ed) Contested Terrains, SAHANZ Proceedings, Perth.
26. Woodcock, 1., Dovey, K. & Wood, S. (2004) 'Limits to Urban Character', in Edquist, H. & Frichot, H. (Eds) Limits SAHANZ Proceedings, Vol2, Melbourne, pp. 545-550.