Impact of crooked nose rhinoplasty on observer perceptions of attractiveness

Laryngoscope

Volumn 122, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 773-778

  Roxbury, Christopher ^b   Ishii, Masaru ^a   Godoy, Andres ^b   Papel, Ira ^b   Byrne, Patrick J ^b   Boahene, Kofi D O ^b   Ishii, Lisa E ^b  

^a Division of Rhinology   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

beauty; crooked nose; facial attention; Rhinoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROOKED NOSE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ESTHETICS; FACE ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOSE DISEASE; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; BEAUTY; BODY IMAGE; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHINOPLASTY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858752790     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23191     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Grammer K, Thornhill R,. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol 1994; 108: 233-242.
2. Perrett DI, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Lee KJ, Rowland DA, Edwards R,. Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 1999; 20: 295-307.
3. Rhodes G, Proffitt F, Grady JM, Sumich A,. Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychon Bull Rev 1998; 5: 659-669.
4. Rhodes G, Roberts J, Simmons L,. Reflections on symmetry and attractiveness. Psychol Evol Gend 1999; 1: 279-295.
5. Moller AP,. Female preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature (London) 1992; 357: 238-240.
6. Morris MR, Casey K,. Female swordtail fish prefer symmetrical sexual signal. Anim Behav 1998; 55: 33-39.
7. Markow TA,. Evolutionary ecology of developmental instability. Ann Rev Entomol 1995; 40: 105-120.
8. Ishii L, Carey J, Byrne P, Zee DS, Ishii M,. Measuring attentional bias to peripheral facial deformities. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 459-465.
9. Springer IN, Wannicke B, Warnke PH, et al. Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59: 156-162.
10. Dingman RO, Natvig P,. The nose. In:, Dingman RO, Natvig P, eds. Surgery of Facial Fractures. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1969: 267.
11. Godoy A, Ishii M, Byrne PJ, Boahene KD, Encarnacion CO, Ishii LE,. The straight truth: measuring observer attention to the crooked nose. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 937-941.
12. Nakano T, Tanaka K, Endo Y, et al. Atypical gaze patterns in children and adults with autism spectrum disorders dissociated from developmental changes in gaze behaviour. Proc Biol Sci 2010; 277: 2935-2943.
13. Bull R, Rumsey RN,. Social Psychology of Facial Appearance. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1988.
14. Shipchandler T, Papel I,. The crooked nose. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27: 203-212.
15. Bronstad PM, Langlois JH, Russell R,. Computational models of facial attractiveness judgments. Perception 2008; 37: 126-142.
16. Valente SM,. Visual disfigurement and depression. Plast Surg Nurs 2009; 29: 10-16; quiz 17-18.
17. Valente SM,. Visual disfigurement and depression. Plast Surg Nurs 2004; 24: 140-146; quiz 147-148.
18. Levine E, Degutis L, Pruzinsky T, Shin J, Persing JA,. Quality of life and facial trauma: psychological and body image effects. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54: 502-510.
19. Orr DA, Reznikoff M, Smith GM,. Body image, self-esteem, and depression in burn-injured adolescents and young adults. J Burn Care Rehabil 1989; 10: 454-461.
20. Ogden J, Lindridge L,. The impact of breast scarring on perceptions of attractiveness: an experimental study. J Health Psychol 2008; 13: 303-310.