SPIRE: Systematic protein investigative research environment

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 122-126

  Kolker, Eugene ^a,b,c,d   Higdon, Roger ^a,b   Welch, Dean ^a   Bauman, Andrew ^a   Stewart, Elizabeth ^a   Haynes, Winston ^a   Broomall, William ^a   Kolker, Natali ^a,b  

^a SEATTLE CHILDREN S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b SEATTLE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Data integration; False discovery rates; Protein annotation; Protein identification; Proteomics pipeline

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; LOCAL FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODEL ORGANISM PROTEIN EXPRESSION DATABASE; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEOMICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMATIC PROTEIN INVESTIGATIVE RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MITOCHONDRION; PROTEIN DATABASE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MITOCHONDRIA; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEOMICS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84858743300     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cox J, M A Heeren R, James P, Jorrin-Novo JV, Kolker E, Levander F, et al. Facing challenges in Proteomics today and the coming decade: Report of Roundtable Discussions at the EuPA Scientific Meeting - Estoril J Proteomics. 2011 May 3. [Epub ahead of print].
2. Higdon R., van Belle G., Kolker E. A note on the false discovery rate and inconsistent comparisons between experiments. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1225-1228.
3. van Belle G., Fisher L. Biostatistics 2004, John Wiley and Sons.
4. Hather G., Higdon R., Bauman A., von Haller P.D., Kolker E. Estimating false discovery rates for peptide and protein identification using randomized databases. Proteomics 2010, 10:2369-2373.
5. Higdon R., Hogan J.M., Kolker N., van Belle G., Kolker E. Experiment-specific estimation of peptide identification probabilities using a randomized database. OMICS 2007, 11:351-365.
6. Craig R., Beavis R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1466-1467.
7. Geer L.Y., Markey S.P., Kowalak J.A., Wagner L., Xu M., Maynard D.M., et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:958-964.
8. Lam H., Deutsch E.W., Eddes J.S., Eng J.K., King N., Stein S.E., et al. Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS. Proteomics 2007, 7:655-667.
9. Higdon R., Kolker E. A predictive model for identifying proteins by a single peptide match. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2007, 23:277-280.
10. Reiter L., Claassen M., Schrimpf S.P., Jovanovic M., Schmidt A., Buhmann J.M., et al. Protein identification false discovery rates for very large proteomics data sets generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:2405-2417.
11. Higdon R, Reiter L, Hather G, Haynes W, Kolker N, Stewart E, et al. IPM An integrated protein model for false discovery rate estimation and identification in high-throughput proteomics. J Proteomics In Press.
12. UniProt Consortium: ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:D214-D219.
13. Harel A., Dalah I., Pietrokovski M., Safran M., Lancet D. Omics data management and annotation. Chapter 3 Bioinformatics for Omics data: methods and protocols series: Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 719 2011, Humana Press. B. Mayer (Ed.).
14. Kanehisa M., Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:27-30.
15. Caspi R., Foerster H., Fulcher C.A., Kaipa P., Krummenacker M., Latendresse M., et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:D623-D631.
16. Thomas P.D., Campbell M.J., Kejariwal A., Mi H., Karlak B., Daverman R., et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res 2003, 13:2129-2141.
17. Matthews L., Gopinath G., Gillespie M., Caudy M., Croft D., de Bono B., et al. Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D619-D622.
18. Louie B., Higdon R., Kolker E. The GAMMER model of sequence similarity, function specificity, and function similarity for protein annotation. Plos One 2009, 4(10):e7546.
19. Tatusov R.L., Fedorova N.D., Jackson J.D., Jacobs A.R., Kiryutin B., Koonin E.V., et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:41.
20. King N.L., Deutsch E.W., Ranish J.A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Eddes J.S., Mallick P., et al. Analysis of the S. cerevisiae proteome with PeptideAtlas. Genome Biol 2006, 7:11-18.
21. Higdon R., Haynes W., Kolker E. Meta-analysis for protein identification: a case study on yeast data. OMICS 2010, 14:309-314.
22. Bauman A., Higdon R., Rapson S., Loiue B., Hogan J., Stacy R., et al. Design and initial characterization of the SC-200 proteomics standard. OMICS 2011, 15:73-82.
23. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002, 74:5383-5392.
24. McCullagh P., Nelder J.A. Generalized linear models 1999, Chapman Hall, London.
25. Smyth G.K. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3. [Article 3].
26. Kolker E., Hogan J.M., Higdon R., Kolker N., Landorf E., Yakunin A.F., et al. Development of BIATECH-54 standard mixtures for assessment of protein identification and relative expression. Proteomics 2007, 7:3693-3698.