Sound can enhance the suppression of visual target detection in apparent motion trajectory

Vision Research

Volumn 59, Issue , 2012, Pages 25-33

  Hidaka, Souta ^a   Teramoto, Wataru ^b   Nagai, Masayoshi ^c  

^a RIKKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b MURORAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Apparent motion; Audio visual interaction; Object representation; Transient sounds; Visual target detection

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APPARENT MOTION TRAJECTORY; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SIGNAL DETECTION; SOUND; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84858737411     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alpert G.F., Hein G., Tsai N., Naumer M.J., Knight R.T. Temporal characteristics of audiovisual information processing. The Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:5344-5349.
2. Amedi A., von Kriegstein K., van Atteveldt N.M., Beauchamp M.S., Naumer M.J. Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 166:559-571.
3. Andersen T.S., Mamassian P. Audiovisual integration of stimulus transients. Vision Research 2008, 48(25):2537-2544.
4. Anscombe F.J. On estimating binomial response relations. Biometrika 1956, 43(3/4):461-464.
5. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
6. Burr D. Motion smear. Nature 1980, 284:164-165.
7. Calvert G.A., Spence C., Stein B.E. The handbook of multisensory processing 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge.
8. Driver J., Noesselt T. Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on 'sensory-specific' brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron 2008, 57(1):11-23.
9. Ernst M.O., Bülthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Science 2004, 8:162-169.
10. Hein G., Doehrmann O., Müller N.G., Kaiser J., Muckli L., Naumer M.J. Object familiarity and semantic congruency modulate responses in cortical audiovisual integration areas. The Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:7881-7887.
11. Hidaka, S., Nagai, M., Sekuler, A. B., Bennett, P. J., & Gyoba, J. (2011). Inhibition of target detection in apparent motion trajectory. Journal of Vision, 11(10), 2, 1-12.
12. Hidaka S., Teramoto W., Gyoba J., Suzuki Y. Sound can prolong the visible persistence of moving visual objects. Vision Research 2010, 50(20):2093-2099.
13. Hogendoorn H., Carlson T.A., Verstraten F.A.J. Interpolation and extrapolation on the path of apparent motion. Vision Research 2008, 48(7):872-881.
14. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219.
15. Keetels M., Vroomen J. The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 167(4):635-640.
16. Kolers P.A. Aspects of motion perception 1972, Pergamon Press, Oxford, NY.
17. Korte A. Kinematoskopische Untersuchungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 1915, 72:193-296.
18. Kubovy M., van Valkenburg D. Auditory and visual objects. Cognition 2001, 80:97-126.
19. Lacey S., Sathian K. Multisensory object representation: Insights from studies of vision and touch. Progress in Brain Research 2011, 191:165-176.
20. Laurienti P.J., Kraft R.A., Maldjian J.A., Burdett J.H., Wallace M.T. Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 158:405-414.
21. Liu T., Slotnick S.D., Yantis S. Human MT+ mediates perceptual filling-in during apparent motion. NeuroImage 2004, 21(4):1772-1780.
22. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., New Jersey. 2nd ed.
23. McGurk H., MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976, 264(5588):746-748.
24. Moore C.M., Enns J.T. Object updating and the flash-lag effect. Psychological Science 2004, 15:866-871.
25. Moore C.M., Mordkoff J.T., Enns J.T. The path of least persistence. Object status mediates visual updating. Vision Research 2007, 47:1624-1630.
26. Morrongiello B.A., Fenwick K.D., Chance G. Crossmodal learning in newborn infants: Inferences about properties of auditory-visual events. Infant Behavior & Development 1998, 21:543-554.
27. Muckli L., Kohler A., Kriegeskorte N., Singer W. Primary visual cortex activity along the apparent-motion trace reflects illusory perception. PLoS Biology 2005, 3(8):e265.
28. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
29. Sanabria D., Soto-Faraco S., Chan J.S., Spence C. When does visual perceptual grouping affect multisensory integration?. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4(2):218-229.
30. Sanabria D., Soto-Faraco S., Spence C. Exploring the role of visual perceptual grouping on the audiovisual integration of motion. NeuroReport 2004, 15(18):2745-2749.
31. Sheth B.R., Shimojo S. Sound-induced recovery from and persistence against visual filling-in. Vision Research 2004, 44:1907-1917.
32. Sorkin R.D. Spreadsheet signal detection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1999, 31(1):46-54.
33. Soto-Faraco S., Lyons J., Gazzaniga M., Spence C., Kingstone A. The ventriloquist in motion: Illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 14(1):139-146.
34. Spence C., Driver J. Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1997, 59:1-22.
35. Stein B.E., London N., Wilkinson L.K., Price D.D. Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: A psychophysical analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8:497-506.
36. Sterzer P., Haynes J.D., Rees G. Primary visual cortex activation on the path of apparent motion is mediated by feedback from hMT+/V5. NeuroImage 2006, 32(3):1308-1316.
37. Thurstone L.L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 1994, 101(2):266-270.
38. Vroomen J., de Gelder B. Sound enhances visual perception: Cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26(5):1583-1590.
39. Wertheimer M. Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psycholigie 1912, 61:161-265.
40. Wibral M., Bledowski C., Kohler A., Singer W., Muckli L. The timing of feedback to early visual cortex in the perception of long-range apparent motion. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19(7):1567-1582.
41. Yantis S., Nakama T. Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1(6):508-512.