Arena3D: Visualizing time-driven phenotypic differences in biological systems

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Secrier, Maria ^a   Pavlopoulos, Georgios A ^b,c   Aerts, Jan ^b,c   Schneider, Reinhard ^a,d  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION LEVELS; HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION; MURINE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; PHENOTYPIC DIFFERENCES; STANDALONE APPLICATIONS; TEMPORAL INFORMATION; VISUALIZATION AND ANALYSIS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; DATA HANDLING; GENE EXPRESSION; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; STEM CELLS; TOOLS; VISUALIZATION;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

MURINAE;

PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS;

ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MICE; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84858731684     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-45     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Henderson M, Gonzales I, Arora S, Choudhary A, Trent J, Von Hoff D, Mousses S, Azorsa D. High-throughput RNAi screening identifies a role for TNK1 in growth and survival of pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 2011, 9(6):724-32. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0436, 21536687.
2. Bayona-Bafaluy M, Sánchez-Cabo F, Fernández-Silva P, Pérez-Martos A, Enríquez J. A genome-wide shRNA screen for new OxPhos related genes. Mitochondrion 2011, 11(3):467-75. 10.1016/j.mito.2011.01.007, 21292037.
3. Cerone M, Burgess D, Naceur-Lombardelli C, Lord C, Ashworth A. High-throughput RNAi screening reveals novel regulators of telomerase. Cancer Res 2011, 71(9):3328-40. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2734, 21531765.
4. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 2010, 327(5964):425-31. 10.1126/science.1180823, 20093466.
5. Pavlopoulos G, O' Donoghue S, Satagopam V, Soldatos T, Pafilis ERS. Arena3D: visualization of biological networks in 3D. BMC Syst Biol 2008, 2:104. 10.1186/1752-0509-2-104, 2637860, 19040715.
6. Kincaid R, Kuchinsky A, Creech M. VistaClara: an expression browser plug-in for Cytoscape. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(18):2112-4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn368, 2530886, 18678589.
7. Westenberg MA, van Hijum SAFT, Kuipers OP, Roerdink JBTM. Visualizing Genome Expression and Regulatory Network Dynamics in Genomic and Metabolic Context. Computer Graphics Forum 2008, 27(3):887-94.
8. Westenberg MA, van Hijum SAFT, Lulko AT, Kuipers OP, Roerdink JBTM. Interactive visualization of gene regulatory networks with associated gene expression time series data. Visualization in Medicine and Life Sciences 2007, 293-312. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
9. Bourqui R, Westenberg MA. Visualizing Temporal Dynamics at the Genomic and Metabolic Level. 13th Int Conf Information Visualization 2009, 317-322.
10. Meyer M, Wong B, Styczynski M, Pfister H. Pathline: a tool for comparative functional genomics. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc EuroVis) 2010, 29(3):1043-52.
11. MacArthur BD, Lachmann A, Lemischka IR, Ma'ayan A, . GATE Software for the analysis and visualization of high-dimensional time series expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26(1):143-4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp628, 2796822, 19892805, GATE.
12. Morris JH, Apeltsin L, Newman AM, Baumbach J, Wittkop T, Su G, Bader GD, Ferrin TE. clusterMaker: a multi-algorithm clustering plugin for Cytoscape. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12(1):436. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-436, 3262844, 22070249.
13. Wu W, Noble WS. Genomic data visualization on the Web. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(11):1804-5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth154, 14988106.
14. Gilbert D, Morgner T. JFreeChart, a free Java class library for generating charts. , http://www.jfree.org/jfreechart
15. Kendall MG, Stuart A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume 2: Inference and Relationship. Griffin 1973, 31:19-21.
16. Kruglyak S, Tang H. A New Estimator of Significance of Correlation in Time Series Data. Journal of Computational Biology 2001, 8:463-70. 10.1089/106652701753216486, 11694177.
17. Masry E. The estimation of the correlation coefficient of bivariate data under dependence: Convergence analysis. Statistics & Probability Letters 2011, 81:1039-45. 10.1016/j.spl.2011.02.026, 22448024.
18. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 1995, 57(1):289-300.
19. Agresti A, Coull B. Approximate is better than'exact' for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician 1998, 52:119-126.
20. Wilson E. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 1927, 22:209-212.
21. Crippen GM, Havel TF. Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation 1988, New York: Wiley.
22. Lu R, Markowetz F, Unwin R, Leek J, Airoldi E, MacArthur B, Lachmann A, Rozov R, Ma'ayan A, Boyer L, Troyanskaya O, Whetton A, Lemischka I. Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 2009, 462:7271-358.
23. Schwanhäusser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, Chen W, Selbach M. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 2011, 473(7347):337-42. 10.1038/nature10098, 21593866.
24. Neumann B, Walter T, Heriche JK, Bulkescher J, Erfle H, Conrad C, Rogers P, Poser I, Held M, Liebel U, Cetin C, Sieckmann F, Pau G, Kabbe R, Wuensche A, Satagopam V, Schmitz MHA, Chapuis C, Gerlich DW, Schneider R, Eils R, Huber W, Peters JM, Hyman AA, Durbin R, Pepperkok R, Ellenberg J. Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes. Nature 2010, 464:721-727. 10.1038/nature08869, 3108885, 20360735.
25. Marnef A, Sommerville J, Ladomery M. RAP55: insights into an evolutionarily conserved protein family. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009, 41(5):977-81. 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.06.015, 18723115.
26. Tanaka K, Ogawa K, Takagi M, Imamoto N, Matsumoto K, Tsujimoto M. RAP55, a cytoplasmic mRNP component, represses translation in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:40096-40106. 10.1074/jbc.M609059200, 17074753.
27. Yang W, Yu J, Gulick T, Bloch K, Bloch D. RNA-associated protein 55 (RAP55) localizes to mRNA processing bodies and stress granules. RNA 2006, 12:547-554. 10.1261/rna.2302706, 1421083, 16484376.
28. Gache V, Waridel P, Winter C, Juhem A, Schroeder M, Shevchenko A, Popov A. Xenopus meiotic microtubule-associated interactome. PLoS One 2010, 5(2):e9248. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009248, 2822853, 20174651.
29. Torkamani APL, Hegele R, Schork N, Hegele R. Kinase mutations in human disease: interpreting genotype-phenotype relationships. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11(1):60-74. 10.1038/nrg2707, 20019687.
30. Lopes TJ, Schaefer M, Shoemaker J, Matsuoka Y, Fontaine JF, Neumann G, Andrade-Navarro MA, Kawaoka Y, Kitano H. Tissue-specific subnetworks and characteristics of publicly available human protein interaction databases. Bioinformatics 2011, 27(17):2414-2421. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr414, 21798963.
31. Flicek P, Aken B, Ballester B, et al. Ensembl's 10th year. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D557-D562. 10.1093/nar/gkp972, 2808936, 19906699.