Three-mode principal component analysis of genotype-by-environment-by-trait data in durum wheat

Journal of Crop Improvement

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 619-649

  Dettori, Marco ^a   Crossa, José ^b   Ammar, Karim ^b   Peña, Roberto J ^b   Varela, Mario ^c  

^a Agricultural Research Agency of Sardinia (AGRIS DIRVE)   (Italy)

^b INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

^c Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agricolas Habana   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Durum wheat breeding; Genotype location year interaction; Three way interaction; Three way principal component analysis; Three way sites regression model

Indexed keywords

SEMOLINA; TRITICUM TURGIDUM SUBSP. DURUM;

EID: 84858720067     PISSN: 15427528     EISSN: 15427536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2011.592930     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. American Association of Cereal Chemists 2000. Approved methods of the AACC, 10th ed. St. Paul, MN: AACC.
2. Annicchiarico, P. 1997. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) of genotype-location interaction in variety trials repeated over years. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:1,072-1,077.
3. Annicchiarico, P. 2009. Coping with and exploiting genotype-by-environment interactions. In Plant breeding and farmer participation, edited by S. Ceccarelli, E.P. Guimarães, E. Weltzien, 519-564. Rome: FAO.
4. Axford, D.W.E., E.E. McDermott, and D.G. Redman. 1978. Small-scale tests of breadmaking quality. Milling Feed Fert. 161:18-20.
5. Bänziger, M., F.J. Bertrán, and H.R. Lafitte. 1997. Efficiency of high-nitrogen selection environments for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments. Crop Sci. 37:1,103-1,109.
6. Basford, K.E., P.M. Kroonenberg, I.H. DeLacy, and P.K. Lawrence. 1990. Multiattribute evaluation of regional cotton variety trial. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 79:225-324.
7. Basford, K.E., P.M. Kroonenberg, and M. Cooper. 1996. Three-mode analytical methods for crop improvement programs. In Plant adaptation and crop improvement, edited by M. Cooper and G.L. Hammer, 291-305. Wallingford, UK: CAB International/ICRISAT & IRRI.
8. Blum, A., and Y. Pnuel. 1990. Physiological attributes associated with drought resistance of wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean environment. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41:799-810.
9. Ceccarelli, S. 1989. Wide adaptation: How wide? Euphytica 40:197-205.
10. Ceccarelli, S. 1996. Positive interpretation of genotype by environment interaction in relation to sustainability and biodiversity. In Plant adaptation and crop improvement, edited by M. Cooper and G.L. Hammer, 467-486. Wallingford, UK: CAB International/ICRISAT & IRRI.
11. Chapman, S.C., J. Crossa, K.E. Basford, and P.M. Kroonenberg. 1997. Genotype by environments effects and selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize. II. Three-mode pattern analysis. Euphytica 95:11-20.
12. Clarke, J.M. 2000. Improvement of durum wheat grain quality: breeding. In Durum wheat semolina and pasta quality. Recent achievements and new trends, edited by J. Abecassis, J.-C. Autran, and P. Feillet, 27-54. Paris: Les Colloques, no 99, INRA Editions.
13. Cooper, M., D.R. Woodruff, I.G. Phillips, K.E. Basford, and A.R. Gilmour. 2001. Genotype-by-management interactions for grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Field Crops Res. 69:47-67.
14. Crossa, J., K.E. Basford, S. Taba, I.H. DeLacy, and E. Silva. 1995. Three-mode analysis of maize using morphological and agronomic attributes measured in multilocation trials. Crop Sci. 35:1,483-1,491.
15. Crossa, J., and P.L. Cornelius. 1997. Site regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar trials sites under heterogeneity of error variances. Crop Sci. 37:406-415.
16. de la Vega, A.J., and S.C. Chapman. 2001. Genotype by environment interaction and indirect selection for yield in sunflower. II. Three-mode principal component analysis of oil and biomass yield across environments in Argentina. Field Crops Res. 72:39-50.
17. de la Vega, A.J., A.J. Hall, and P.M. Kroonenberg. 2002. Investigating the physiological bases of predictable and unpredictable genotype by environment interactions using three-mode pattern analysis. Field Crops Res. 78:165-183.
18. Dettori, M., C. Cesaraccio, A. Motroni, D. Spano, and P. Duce. 2011. Using CERES-wheat to simulate durum wheat production and phenology in Southern Sardinia, Italy. Field Crops. Res. 120:179-188.
19. Dexter, J.E., and R.R. Matsuo. 1977. Influence of protein content on some durum wheat quality parameters. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:717-727.
20. Dexter, JE" R.R. Matsuo, and D.G. Martin.1987. The relationship of durum wheat test weight to milling performance and spaghetti quality. Cereal Foods World 32:772-777.
21. Dexter, J.E., K.R. Preston, D.G. Martin, and E.J. Gander. 1994. The effects of protein content and starch damage on the physical dough properties and bread-making quality of Canadian durum wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 20:139-151.
22. Fischer, G., M. Shah, and H. van Velthuizen. 2002. Climate change and agricultural vulnerability. Vienna, Austria: HASA.
23. Galati, A., and E. Schimmenti. 2008. È boom per il grano duro ma i prezzi calano. L'Informatore Agrario 34:34-38.
24. Garrido-Lestache, E., R.J. Lopez-Bellido, and L. Lopez-Bellido. 2005. Durum wheat quality under Mediterranean conditions as affected by N rate, timing and splitting, N form, and S fertilization. Eur. J. Agron. 23:265-278.
25. Gauch, H.G. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705-715.
26. Gauch, H.G. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
27. Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci. 46:1,488-1,500.
28. Gauch, H.G., H.-P. Piepho, and P. Annicchiarico. 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci. 48:866-889.
29. Kang, M.S. 1998. Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. Adv. Agron. 62:199-252.
30. Kroonenberg, P.M., and J. de Leeuw. 1980. Principal component analysis of threemode data by means of alternating least square algorithms. Psychometrika 45:69-97.
31. Kroonenberg, P.M., and K.E. Basford. 1989. An investigation of multi-attribute genotype response across environments using three-mode principal component analysis. Euphytica 44:109-123.
32. Matsuo, R.R., and J.E. Dexter. 1980a. Relationship between some durum wheat physical characteristics and semolina milling properties. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:49-53.
33. Matsuo, R.R., and J.E. Dexter. 1980b. Comparison of experimentally milled durum wheat semolina to semolina produced by some Canadian commercial mills. Cereal Chem. 57:117-122.
34. Miflin, B. 2000. Technologies for crop improvement in the 21st century. In Durum wheat improvement in the Mediterranean region: New challenges, edited by C. Royo, M.M. Nachit, N. Di Fonzo, and J.L. Araus, 19-25. Zaragoza, Spain: CIHEAM.
35. Peña, R.J., A. Amaya, S. Rajaram, and A. Mujeeb-Kazi, A. 1990. Variation in quality characteristics associated with some spring 1B/1R translocation wheats. J. Cereal Sci. 12:105-112.
36. Peterson, C.J., P.S. Graybosch, P.S. Baenziger, and A.W. Grombacher. 1992. Genotype and environment effect on quality characteristics of Hard Red Winter Wheat. Crop Sci. 32:98-103.
37. Piepho, H.P., and F.A. van Eeuwijk. 2002. Stability analyses in crop performance evaluation. In Crop improvement: Challenges in the twenty-first century, edited by M. Kang, 315-351. New York: Haworth Press.
38. Rincon, F., B. Johnson, J. Crossa, and S. Taba. 1997. Identifying subsets of maize accessions by three-mode principal component analysis. Crop Sci. 37:1,936-1,943.
39. Setimela, P.S., B. Vivek, M. Bänziger, J. Crossa, and F. Maideni. 2007. Evaluation of early to medium maturing open pollinated maize varieties in SADC region using GGE biplot based on the SREG model. Field Crops Res. 103:161-169.
40. Simmonds, N.W. 1991. Selection for local adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:363-367.
41. Timmerman, M.E., and H.A.L. Kiers. 2000. Three-mode principal component analysis. Choosing the numbers of components and sensitivity to local optima. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 53:1-16.
42. Timsina, J., and E. Humphreys. 2006. Performance of CERES-Rice and CERES-Wheat models in rice-wheat systems: A review. Agric. Syst. 90:5-31.
43. Tucker, L.R. 1963. Implications of factor analysis of three-way matrices for measurement of change. In Problems in measuring change, Ed. C.W. Harris, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. p. 122-137.
44. Tucker, L.R. 1964. The extension of factor analysis to three-dimensional matrices. In Contributions to mathematical psychology, edited by H. Gulliksen and N. Frederiksen,. New York: Holt, Rinehardt, & Winston. p. 110-127.
45. Tucker, L.R. 1966. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 31:279-311.
46. USDA Soil Survey Staff. 2002. Keys to soil taxonomy. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
47. van Eeuwijk, F.A., and P.M. Kroonenberg. 1998. Multiplicative models for interaction in Three-way ANOVA, with applications to plant breeding. Biometrics 54:1,315-1,333.
48. Varela, M., J. Crossa, J. Rane, A.K. Joshi, and R. Trethowan. 2006. Analysis of a threeway interaction including multi-attributes. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 57:1,185-1,193.
49. Varela, M., J. Crossa, A.K. Joshi, P.L. Cornelius, and Y Manes. 2009. Generalizing the site regression model to three-way interaction including multi-attributes. Crop Sci. 49:2,043-2,057.
50. Yan, W., and M.S. Kang. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
51. Yan, W., and N.A. Tinker. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86:623-645.
52. Yan, W., M.S. Kang, S. Ma, S. Woods, and P.L. Cornelius. 2007. GGE biplots vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47:643-655.
53. Yang, R.-C., J. Crossa, P.L. Cornelius, and J. Burgueño. 2009. Biplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction: Proceed with caution. Crop Sci. 49:1,564-1,576.
54. Zobel, R.W., M.J. Wright, and H.G. Gauch. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80:388-393.