Practical method of adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using real-time electromagnetic tracking

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1903-1911

  Olsen, Jeffrey R ^a   Noel, Camille E ^a   Baker, Kenneth ^a   Santanam, Lakshmi ^a   Michalski, Jeff M ^a   Parikh, Parag J ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive; Cancer; Intrafraction; Prostate; Radiotherapy

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE; ADAPTIVE PROCESS; ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY; AUTOMATED PROCESS; CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOSE DELIVERY; DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; DOSIMETRIC IMPACT; ELECTROMAGNETIC TRACKING; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; INTRAFRACTION; LOCALIZATION SYSTEM; PLANNING TARGET VOLUMES; PRACTICAL METHOD; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCERS; REAL TIME TRACKING; SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS; STEP-AND-SHOOT; TRACKING DATA;

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DISEASES; ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT TRACKING; PHYSICAL THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; UROLOGY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; MALE; PLANNING TARGET VOLUME; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; RECTUM; RISK ASSESSMENT; STEP AND SHOOT MULTI LEAF COLLIMATION; TREATMENT PLANNING; WORKLOAD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DOSE FRACTIONATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; ORGANS AT RISK; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOTHERAPY, IMAGE-GUIDED; RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED; RECTUM; ROTATION; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84858705381     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: 1879355X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.040     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beckendorf V, Guerif S, Prise EL, et al. 70 Gy versus (vs) 80 Gy dose escalation Getug 06 French Trial for Localized Prostate Cancer: Mature results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 72:S96-S97.
2. Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, et al. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: First results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial [see Comment]. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:475-487. (Pubitemid 46805903)
3. Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer [see Comment]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70:67-74. (Pubitemid 350251041)
4. Peeters ST, Heemsbergen WD, Koper PC, et al. Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy [see Comment]. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1990-1996. (Pubitemid 46622106)
5. Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: A randomized controlled trial [see Comment] [Erratum appears in JAMA 2008;299:899-900]. JAMA 2005;294:1233-1239. (Pubitemid 41352111)
6. Aubry JF, Beaulieu L, Girouard LM, et al. Measurements of intrafraction motion and interfraction and intrafraction rotation of prostate by three-dimensional analysis of daily portal imaging with radiopaque markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;60:30-39. (Pubitemid 39165466)
7. Chen J, Lee RJ, Handrahan D, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using implanted fiducial markers with daily portal imaging: Assessment of prostate organ motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68:912-919. (Pubitemid 46830845)
8. Britton KR, Takai Y, Mitsuya M, et al. Evaluation of inter- and intrafraction organ motion during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer measured by a newly developed on-board image-guided system. Radiat Med 2005;23:14-24. (Pubitemid 40410219)
9. Kotte AN, Hofman P, Lagendijk JJ, et al. Intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy: Analysis of 427 patients with implanted fiducial markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:419-425. (Pubitemid 47380089)
10. Kupelian P, Willoughby T, Mahadevan A, et al. Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67:1088-1098.
11. Willoughby TR, Kupelian PA, Pouliot J, et al. Target localization and real-time tracking using the Calypso 4D localization system in patients with localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:528-534.
12. Kuban D, Pollack A, Huang E, et al. Hazards of dose escalation in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;57:1260-1268. (Pubitemid 37443963)
13. Nederveen AJ, van der Heide UA, Dehnad H, et al. Measurements and clinical consequences of prostate motion during a radiotherapy fraction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53: 206-214. (Pubitemid 34465826)
14. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17: 168-172. (Pubitemid 29022390)
15. Olsen JR, Parikh PJ. Calypso real-time localization and tracking for treatment of prostate cancer with external beam radiotherapy. In: Image Guided Radiation Therapy. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011. pp. 407-410.
16. Noel CE, Santanam L, Olsen JR, et al. An automated method for adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients using continuous fiducial based tracking. Phys Med Biol 2010;55:18.
17. Santanam L, Malinowski K, Hubenshmidt J, et al. Fiducial-based translational localization accuracy of electromagnetic tracking system and on-board kilovoltage imaging system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70: 892-899. (Pubitemid 351199721)
18. Li HS, Chetty IJ, Enke CA, et al. Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;71:801-812.
19. Cranmer-Sargison G. A treatment planning investigation into the dosimetric effects of systematic prostate patient rotational set-up errors. Med Dosim 2008;33:199-205.
20. Kupelian PA, Langen KM, Zeidan OA, et al. Daily variations in delivered doses in patients treated with radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;66:876-882. (Pubitemid 44436702)
21. Deurloo KE, Steenbakkers RJ, Zijp LJ, et al. Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy [Erratum appears in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61:1609]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61: 228-238. (Pubitemid 40039127)
22. Nichol AM, Brock KK, Lockwood GA, et al. A magnetic resonance imaging study of prostate deformation relative to implanted gold fiducial markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67:48-56. (Pubitemid 44959481)
23. Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJ, Overweg J, et al. Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: Proof of concept. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:N229-N237.
24. Kirkby C, Stanescu T, Rathee S, et al. Patient dosimetry for hybrid MRI-radiotherapy systems. Med Phys 2008;35:1019-1027. (Pubitemid 351322648)
25. Dempsey J, Dionne B, Fitzsimmons J, et al. A real-time MRI guided external beam radiotherapy delivery system. Med Phys 2006;33:2254.