Genetic engineering in biomimetic composites

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 191-197

  Laaksonen, Päivi ^a   Szilvay, Géza R ^a   Linder, Markus B ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMIMETICS;

BIOMIMETIC COMPOSITES; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; FUNCTIONAL MOLECULES; IN-BUILDINGS; NATURAL COMPOSITE MATERIALS; NATURAL MATERIALS;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

ABDUCTIN; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL; CELLULOSE; CONNECTIN; DOPA; ELASTIN; HYDROXYAPATITE; PIF PROTEIN; PROTEIN; RESILIN; SILK FIBROIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADHESION; BIOMIMETICS; BIOMINERALIZATION; BONE; DNA SEQUENCE; ENTROPY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLLUSC; NACRE; NONHUMAN; PINCTADA; PINCTADA FUCATA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; REVIEW; STEREOCHEMISTRY; TENDON; WOOD;

EID: 84858700153     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.01.001     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Feng L., et al. Super-hydrophobic surfaces: from natural to artificial. Adv. Mat. 2002, 14:1857-1860.
2. Autumn K., Gravish N. Gecko adhesion: evolutionary nanotechnology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 2008, 366:1575-1590.
3. Vukusic P., Sambles J.R. Photonic structures in biology. Nature 2003, 424:852.
4. Espinosa H.D., et al. Merger of structure and material in nacre and bone - perspectives on de novo biomimetic materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2009, 54:1059-1100.
5. Aizenberg J., et al. Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: structural hierarchy from the nanoscale to the macroscale. Science 2005, 309:275-278.
6. Meyers M.A., et al. Biological materials: structure and mechanical properties. Prog. Mat. Sci. 2008, 53:1-206.
7. Li X., et al. Nanoscale structural and mechanical characterization of a natural nanocomposite material: the shell of red abalone. Nano Lett. 2004, 4:613-617.
8. Heuer A.H., et al. Innovative materials processing strategies: a biomimetic approach. Science 1992, 255:1098-1105.
9. Rubner M. Materials science: synthetic sea shell. Nature 2003, 423:925-926.
10. Munch E., et al. Tough, bio-inspired hybrid materials. Science 2008, 322:1516-1520.
11. Tang Z., et al. Nanostructured artificial nacre. Nat Mater 2003, 2:413-418.
12. Walther A., et al. Large-area, lightweight and thick biomimetic composites with superior material properties via fast, economic, and green pathways. Nano Lett. 2010, 10:2742-2748.
13. Espinosa H.D., et al. Tablet-level origin of toughening in abalone shells and translation to synthetic composite materials. Nat Commun 2011, 2:173.
14. Bonderer L.J., et al. Bioinspired design and assembly of platelet reinforced polymer films. Science 2008, 319:1069-1073.
15. Fratzl P., et al. On the role of interface polymers for the mechanics of natural polymeric composites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6:5575-5579.
16. Currey J.D. Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1977, 196:443-463.
17. Suzuki M., et al. An acidic matrix protein, Pif, is a key macromolecule for nacre formation. Science 2009, 325:1388-1390.
18. Suetake T., et al. Chitin-binding proteins in invertebrates and plants comprise a common chitin-binding structural motif. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:17929-17932.
19. Laaksonen P., et al. Genetic engineering of biomimetic nanocomposites: diblock proteins, graphene, and nanofibrillated cellulose. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50:8688-8691.
20. Linder M.B., et al. Efficient purification of recombinant proteins using hydrophobins as tags in surfactant-based two-phase systems. Biochemistry 2004, 43:11873-11882.
21. Levy I., Shoseyov O. Cellulose-binding domains. Biotechnological applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2002, 20:191-213.
22. Levy I., et al. Recombinant cellulose crosslinking protein: a novel paper-modification biomaterial. Cellulose 2002, 9:91-98.
23. Levy I., et al. Engineering a bifunctional starch-cellulose cross-bridge protein. Biomaterials 2004, 25:1841-1849.
24. Cantor C.R., Schimmel P.R. Biophysical Chemistry, Part III: The Behavior of Biological Macromolecules 1998, W. H. Freeman.
25. Linder M., et al. Characterization of a double cellulose-binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271:21268-21272.
26. Weiner S., Addadi L. Design strategies in mineralized biological materials. J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7:689-702.
27. Huang J., et al. The effect of genetically engineered spider silk-dentin matrix protein 1 chimeric protein on hydroxyapatite nucleation. Biomaterials 2007, 28:2358-2367.
28. Wang E., et al. Elastin-like polypeptide based hydroxyapatite bionanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:672-680.
29. Xu H., et al. Self-assembly and mineralization of genetically modifiable biological nanofibers driven by β-structure formation. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:2193-2199.
30. Hardy J.G., Scheibel T.R. Composite materials based on silk proteins. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35:1093-1115.
31. Freddi G., et al. Structure and physical properties of silk fibroin/polyacrylamide blend films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1999, 71:1563-1571.
32. Ayutsede J., et al. Carbon nanotube reinforced Bombyx mori silk nanofibers by the electrospinning process. Biomacromolecules 2005, 7:208-214.
33. Linder M., Teeri T.T. The roles and function of cellulose-binding domains. J. Biotechnol. 1997, 57:15-28.
34. Linder M.B. Hydrophobins: proteins that self assemble at interfaces. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 14:356-363.
35. Laaksonen P., et al. Interfacial engineering by proteins: exfoliation and functionalization of graphene by hydrophobins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49:4946-4949.
36. Davies P.L., et al. Structure and function of antifreeze proteins. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 2002, 357:927-935.
37. Weiss I.M., et al. Covalent modification of chitin with silk-derivatives acts as an amphiphilic self-organizing template in nacre biomineralisation. J. Struct. Biol. 2009, 167:68-75.
38. Gotliv B.-A., et al. Asprich: a novel aspartic acid-rich protein family from the prismatic shell matrix of the bivalve Atrina rigida. Chembiochem 2005, 6:304-314.
39. 3 mineralization using designer molecules and interfaces. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108:4499-4550.
40. Palmer L.C., et al. Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108:4754-4783.
41. Cai Y., Yao J. Effect of proteins on the synthesis and assembly of calcium phosphate nanomaterials. Nanoscale 2010, 2:1842-1848.
42. Cardoso M.B., et al. Protein localization in silica nanospheres derived via biomimetic mineralization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20:3031-3038.
43. Hartgerink J.D., et al. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science 2001, 294:1684-11684.
44. He T., et al. Nanofibrous bio-inorganic hybrid structures formed through self-assembly and oriented mineralization of genetically engineered phage nanofibers. Small 2010, 6:2230-2235.
45. Fan T.-X., et al. Biomorphic mineralization: from biology to materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2009, 54:542-659.
46. Paris O., et al. Biomimetics and biotemplating of natural materials. MRS Bull. 2010, 35:219-225.
47. 2 thin films induced by hydrophobins. Langmuir 2010, 26:6494-6502.
48. Wei G., et al. Biomimetic growth of hydroxyapatite on super water-soluble carbon nanotube-protein hybrid nanofibers. Carbon 2011, 49:2216-2226.
49. Polini A., et al. Biosilica electrically-insulating layers by soft lithography-assisted biomineralisation with recombinant silicatein. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:4674-4678.
50. Schulz A., et al. Protein-mineral hybrid capsules from emulsions stabilized with an amphiphilic protein. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21:9731-9736.
51. Lin Q., et al. Adhesion mechanisms of the mussel foot proteins mfp-1 and mfp-3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:3782-3786.
52. Lee B.P., et al. Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2011, 41:99-132.
53. Barlow D.E., et al. Characterization of the adhesive plaque of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite: amyloid-like nanofibrils are a major component. Langmuir 2010, 26:6549-6556.
54. Kamino K. Molecular design of barnacle cement in comparison with those of mussel and tubeworm. J. Adhes. 2010, 86:96-110.
55. Kamino K. Underwater adhesive of marine organisms as the vital link between biological science and material science. Mar. Biotechnol. 2008, 10:111-121.
56. Heyman A., et al. Protein scaffold engineering towards tunable surface attachment. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48:9290-9294.
57. Linder M., et al. Design of a pH-dependent cellulose-binding domain. FEBS Lett. 1999, 447:13-16.
58. Kasotakis E., et al. Design of metal-binding sites onto self-assembled peptide fibrils. Pept. Sci. 2009, 92:164-172.
59. Cui Y., et al. Chemical functionalization of graphene enabled by phage displayed peptides. Nano Lett. 2010, 10:4559-4565.
60. Seker U.O.S., et al. Quantitative affinity of genetically engineered repeating polypeptides to inorganic surfaces. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:250-257.
61. Tamerler C., et al. Genetically engineered polypeptides for inorganics: a utility in biological materials science and engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2007, 27:558-564.
62. Smith B.L., et al. Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibers and composites. Nature 1999, 399:761-763.
63. Lv S., et al. Designed biomaterials to mimic the mechanical properties of muscles. Nature 2010, 465:69-73.
64. Elvin C.M., et al. Synthesis and properties of crosslinked recombinant pro-resilin. Nature 2005, 437:999-1002.
65. Cao Y., Li H. Polyprotein of GB1 is an ideal artificial elastomeric protein. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6:109-114.
66. Wohlleben W., et al. Recombinantly produced hydrophobins from fungal analogues as highly surface-active performance proteins. Eur. Biophys. J. 2010, 39:457-468.
67. Geim A.K., Novoselov K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6:183-191.
68. Marin F., et al. Mucins and molluscan calcification. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:20667-20675.
69. Jackson A.P., et al. The mechanical design of nacre. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1988, 234:415-440.
70. Weinkamer R., Fratzl P. Mechanical adaptation of biological materials - the examples of bone and wood. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2011, 31:1164-1173.
71. Wösten H.A. Hydrophobins: multipurpose proteins. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2001, 55:625-646.
72. Guillen D., et al. Carbohydrate-binding domains: multiplicity of biological roles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85:1241-1249.
73. Snead M.L., et al. Protein self-assembly creates a nanoscale device for biomineralization. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2006, 26:1296-1300.
74. Garnham C.P., et al. Anchored clathrate waters bind antifreeze proteins to ice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:7363-7367.
75. Li B., Daggett V. Molecular basis for the extensibility of elastin. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 2002, 23:561-573.
76. Bochicchio B., et al. Synthesis of and structural studies on repeating sequences of abductin. Macromol. Biosci. 2005, 5:502-511.
77. Omenetto F.G., Kaplan D.L. New opportunities for an ancient material. Science 2010, 329:528-531.
78. Nova A., et al. Molecular and nanostructural mechanisms of deformation, strength and toughness of spider silk fibrils. Nano Lett. 2010, 10:2626-2634.
79. Li H., et al. Reverse engineering of the giant muscle protein titin. Nature 2002, 418:998-1002.
80. Harrington M.J., et al. Iron-clad fibers: a metal-based biological strategy for hard flexible coatings. Science 2010, 328:216-220.