Visualization techniques to support planning of renewable energy developments

GIS for Environmental Decision-Making

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 227-239

  Miller, David ^a   Morrice, Jane ^a   Coleby, Alastor ^a   Messager, Pernette ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858679828     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. European Commission, Toward Sustainability, 5th Environmental Action Programmel993-2000, OJ C 138, 17/5/93, European Commission, Brussels, 1993.
2. European Commission, Environment 2010: Our Future, Our Choice. The Sixth Environment Action Programme of the European Community, OJ L 242, 10/9/2002, European Commission, Brussels, 2002.
3. European Union, Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice on Environmental Matters, Aarhus, Denmark, 1998.
4. Council of Europe, European Landscape Convention, Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, Florence, 2000.
5. Kwartler, M., Visualization in support of public participation, in Visualisation in Landscape and Environmental Planning, Bishop, I. and Lange, E. Eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 2005, 251-260.
6. Neighbourhood Initiatives Foundation, A Practical Handbook for ‘Planning For Real’ Consultation Exercise, Neighbourhood Initiatives Foundation, Telford, 1995.
7. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM), Participatory Planning for Sustainable Communities: International Experience in Mediation, Negotiation and Engagement in Making Plans, ODPM Publications, Wetherby, 2003.
8. Scottish Executive, Planning Advice Note (PAN) - Community Engagement "Planning with People": Consultation Draft, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/publications/2006/07/14093848/0, 2006.
9. Benson, J., Visual Analysis of Windfarms: Good Practice Guide, Report for Scottish Natural Heritage, the Scottish Renewables Forum and the Scottish Society of Directors of Planning, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh, 2005.
10. Lange, E. and Bishop, I., Communication, perception and visualisation, in Visualization in Landscape and Environmental Planning, Bishop, I. and Lange, E. Eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 2005, 3-21.
11. Piekarski, W. and Thomas, B.H., Future use of augmented reality for environmental and landscape planners, in Visualization in Landscape and Environmental Planning, Bishop, I. and Lange, E. Eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 2005, 234-240.
12. Appleton, K. and Lovett, A., GIS-based visualisation of development proposals: reactions from planning and related professionals, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 321-339, 2005.
13. MacFarlane, R., Stagg, H., Turner, K., and Lievesley, M., Peering through the smoke? Tensions in landscape visualisation, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 341-359, 2005.
14. Leica Geosystems, ERDAS IMAGINE VirtualGIS®, Leica Geosystems, http://gi.leica-geosystems.com, 2005.
15. Ordnance Survey, Land-form PROFILE®, http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/products/landformprofile/, 2005.
16. Discoe, B., Data sources for three-dimensional models, in Visualization in Landscape and Environmental Planning, Bishop, I. and Lange, E. Eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 2005, 35-49.
17. MultiGen-Paradigm, Creation products, MultiGen Paradigm Inc, http://www.multigen-paradigm.com/products/database/creator/, 2005.
18. Autodesk, 3D Studio Max, Autodesk, http://www.autodesk.co.uk, 2005.
19. MultiGen-Paradigm, Visualization products, MultiGen Paradigm Inc, http://www.multigen-paradigm.com/products/runtime/vega_prime/, 2005.
20. Coleby, A.M., Public Attitudes and Community Participation in Wind Farm Development, PhD Thesis, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, 2005.
21. Bishop, I.D. and Miller, D.R., Visual assessment of off-shore wind turbines: the influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables, Renewable Energy, 32, 814-831, 2007.
22. Appleton, K., Lovett, A., Sunnenberg, G., and Dockerty, T., Rural landscape visualisation from GIS databases: a comparison of approaches, options and problems, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26, 141-162, 2002.
23. Daniel, T.C. and Meitner, M.M., Representational validity of landscape visualizations: The effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 61-72, 2001.
24. O’Neill, J. and Spash, C.L., Conceptions of Value in Environmental Decision-Making, Environmental Valuation in Europe, Policy Research Brief No. 4, Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen, 2000.
25. De Marchi, B. and Ravetz, J.R., Participatory Approaches to Environmental Policy, Environmental Valuation in Europe, Policy Research Brief No. 10, Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen, 2001.
26. Bell, S., Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process, Spon, London, 1999.
27. Orland, B., Budthimedhee, K., and Uusitalo, J., Considering virtual worlds as representations of landscape realities and as tools for landscape planning, Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 139-148, 2001.
28. Appleton, K. and Lovett, A., GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defining ‘sufficient’ realism for environmental decision-making, Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 117-131, 2003.