Experimental design for biological systems

SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 471-489

  Chung, Matthias ^a   Haber, Eldad ^b  

^a Texas State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bilevel optimization; Biological applications; Dynamical systems; Experimental design; Inverse problems; Optimal experimental design; Ordinary differential equation; Parameter estimation; System biology

Indexed keywords

BI-LEVEL OPTIMIZATION; BILEVEL OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS; BIOLOGICAL MODELS; COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; DESIGN PROBLEMS; EFFECTIVE ALGORITHMS; ENERGY METABOLISM; INSULIN RESISTANCE; MODEL PARAMETERS; OPTIMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; OPTIMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; SYSTEM BIOLOGY; SYSTEM OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; UNKNOWN PARAMETERS;

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; DESIGN; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; OPTIMIZATION; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; STATISTICS;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84858657760     PISSN: 03630129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/100791063     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. A. C. Atkinson, A. N. Donev, and R. Tobias, Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007.
2. E. Balsa-Canto, A. Alonso, and J. Banga, Computational procedures for optimal experimental design in biological systems, IET Syst. Biol., 2 (2008), pp. 163-172.
3. S. Bandara, J. P. Schlöder, R. Eils, H. G. Bock, and T. Meyer, Optimal experimental design for parameter estimation of a cell signaling model, PLoS Comput. Biol., 5 (2009).
4. R. Bellman, H. Kagiwada, and R. Kalaba, Inverse problems in ecology, J. Theoret. Biol., 11 (1966), pp. 164-167.
5. R. Bergman, L. Phillips, and C. Cobelli, Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man, J. Clin. Invest., 68 (1981), pp. 1456-1467.
6. P. Bingley, Standardization of IVGTT to predict IDDM, Diabetes Care, 15 (1992), pp. 1313-1316.
7. J. F. Bonnans and A. Shapiro, Perturbation analysis of optimization problems, Springer, New York, 2000.
8. R. Boston, D. Stefanovski, and P. Moate, MINMOD millennium: a computer program to calculate glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, Diabetes Technol. Ther., 5 (2003), pp. 1003-1015. (Pubitemid 38009940)
9. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, 6th ed., Cambridge University Press, London, 2008.
10. C. Briat, A new delay-SIR model for pulse vaccination, Biomed. Signal Proces., 4 (2009), pp. 272-277.
11. A. M. Bruckstein, D. L. Donoho, and M. Elad, From sparse solutions of systems of equations to sparse modeling of signals and images, SIAM Rev., 51 (2009), pp. 34-81.
12. E. J. Candes, J. Romberg, and T. Tao, Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete data, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 4 (2006).
13. K. Chaloner and I. Verdinelli, Bayesian experimental design: A review, Statist. Sci., 10 (1995), pp. 273-304.
14. C. Cobelli and A. Ruggeri, A reduced sampling schedule for estimating the parameters of the glucose minimal model from a labeled IVGTT, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg., 38 (1991), pp. 1023-1029.
15. C. Cobelli, A. Ruggeri, J. J. DiStefano, and E. M. Landaw, Optimal design of multioutput sampling schedules-software and applications to endocrine-metabolic and pharmacokinetic models, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg., BME-32, 1985, pp. 249-256.
16. J. J. DiStefano, 3rd, Tracer experiment design for unique identification of nonlinear physiological systems, Am. J. Physiol., 230 (1976), pp. 476-485.
17. D. D. Donoho, For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 59 (2006), pp. 797-829.
18. E. I. Ette and P. J. Williams, Pharmacometrics: The science of quantitative pharmacology, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2007.
19. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1996.
20. E. Haber, L. Horesh, and L. Tenorio, Numerical methods for experimental design of largescale linear ill-posed inverse problems, Inverse Problems, 24 (2008), pp. 273-304.
21. V. Helms, Principles of Computational Cell Biology: From Protein Complexes to Cellular Networks, Wiley-VCH, New York, 2008.
22. S. Jörgensen and T. Plum, On the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant glycosuria by means of intravenous injections of small quantities of grape-sugar, Acta Med. Scand., 58 (1923), pp. 161-200.
23. J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, Springer, New York, 2004.
24. E. L. Lehmann and G. Casella, Theory of Point Estimation, Springer, New York, 1998.
25. S. Lenhart and J. T. Workman, Optimal Control Applied to Biological Models, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2007.
26. P. Magni, G. Sparacino, R. Bellazzi, and C. Cobelli, Reduced sampling schedule for the glucose minimal model: Importance of Bayesian estimation, Amer. J. Physiol., 290 (2006), pp. E177-E184.
27. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 2006.
28. G. Pacini and R. Bergman, MINMOD: A computer program to calculate insulin sensitivity and pancreatic responsivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, Comput. Methods Prog. Biol., 23 (1986), pp. 113-122. (Pubitemid 16027716)
29. A. Poyton, M. Varziri, K. McAuley, P. McLellan, and J. O. Ramsay, Parameter estimation in continuous-time dynamic models using principal differential analysis, Comput. Chem. Engrg., 30 (2006), pp. 698-708. (Pubitemid 43289124)
30. L. Pronzato, Optimal experimental design and some related control problems, Automatica, 44 (2008), pp. 303-325.
31. F. Pukelsheim, Optimal Design of Experiments, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2006.
32. G. P. Quinn and M. J. Keoughm Experimental Design and Analysis for Biologists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
33. J. O. Ramsay, Principal differential analysis: Data reduction by differential operators, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, (1996), pp. 495-508.
34. A. Ruggeri and C. Cobelli, Optimal Sampling Schedule Design May Reveal Inadequacy of Model Structure: A Case Study on the Minimal Model of Glucose Disappearance, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1989, pp. 121-125.
35. A. Ruggeri and C. Cobelli, A reduced sampling schedule for identifying model-based parameters of glucose metabolism: Design and validation, in Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Medical Informatics, B. Barber, D. Cao, D. Qin, and G. Wagner, eds., 1989, pp. 533-537.
36. A. Shapiro, D. Dentcheva, and D. Ruszczynski, Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2009.
37. V. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York, 1995.
38. C. R. Vogel, Computational Method for Inverse Problems, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2002.
39. T. Yoshida, S. Ellner, L. Jones, B. J. M. Bohannan, R. E. Lenski, and N. G. Hairston, Jr., Cryptic population dynamics: Rapid evolution masks trophic interactions, PLoS Biol., 5 (2007), pp. 1868-1879. (Pubitemid 47416585)
40. S. Zenker, J. Rubin, and G. Clermont, From inverse problems in mathematical physiology to quantitative differential diagnoses, PLoS Comput. Biol., 3 (2007), pp. 2072-2086. (Pubitemid 350241934)