Next generation interactive scientific experimenting based on the workflow technology

Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Modelling and Simulation

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 349-356

  Sonntag, Mirko ^a   Karastoyanova, Dimka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Simulation tools and languages; SOA; Workflow adaptation; Workflow management

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION LANGUAGES; INFORMATION SERVICES; LIFE CYCLE; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

INTERACTIVE SYSTEM; RUNTIME ADAPTATION; SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS; SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE PRINCIPLES; SIMULATION TOOLS AND LANGUAGES; WORKFLOW ADAPTATIONS; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENTS; WORKFLOW TECHNOLOGY;

SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA);

EID: 84858645030     PISSN: 10218181     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2316/p.2010.696-046     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Taylor et al. , Workflows for e-Science: Scientific workflows for grids (Springer, 2007).
2. Y. Gil et al. , Examining the challenges of scientific workflows, IEEE Computer, 40(12), 2007.
3. Barga & Gannon, Scientific versus business workflows. In: Taylor et al. (Eds. ), Workflows for e-Science: Scientific Workflows for Grids (Springer, 2007).
4. Akram et al. , Evaluation of BPEL to scientific workflows, Proc. of 6th IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2006.
5. Leymann & Roller, Production workflow: Concepts and techniques (Prentice Hall, 2000).
6. Gehlert et al. , Online testing, requirements engineering and service faults as drivers for adapting service compositions. Service Wave 2008, MONA+, 2009.
7. Ludaescher et al. , Scientific workflows: Business as usual?, Proc. of 7th International Conf. on Business Process Management (BPM), 2009.
8. OASIS, Web services business process execution language (BPEL) version 2. 0, OASIS Standard, 2007.
9. Altintas et al. , Kepler: An extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows, Proc. International Conf. on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, 2004.
10. Churches et al. , Programming scientific and distributed workflow with Triana services, In: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. Special Issue on Scientific Workflows, 2005.
11. Oinn et al. , Taverna: Lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences, In: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2006, 18(10):1067-110. DOI: 10. 1002/cpe. 993.
12. Deelman et al. , Pegasus: Mapping scientific workflows onto the grid, Proc. of 2nd European AcrossGrids Conf. , Springer, 2004, pp. 11-20. (Pubitemid 39741759)
13. I. Wassink et al, Designing workflows on the fly using e-BioFlow, Proc. 7th Conf. on Service Computing (ICSOC), 2009.
14. Sonntag et al. , The missing features of workflow systems for scientific computations, Proc. of Grid Workflow Workshop (GWW), 2010.
15. IBM, WebSphere process server. [Online] http://www-01. ibm.com/software/integration/wps/
16. Oracle, Oracle BPEL process manager. [Online] http://www.oracle.com/ appserver/bpel-home.html http://www.cs. wisc.edu/condor/dagman/
17. Wagner et al. , Vergleich von Business Activity Monitoring Werkzeugen, Fachstudie Softwaretechnik No. 76, University of Stuttgart, 2007.
18. Mietzner et al. , Business grid: Combining web services and the grid, In: Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency (ToPNoC), Special Issue on Concurrency in Process-aware Information Systems, Springer Verlag, 2009.
19. D. Karastoyanova, Enhancing flexibility and reusability of web service flows through parameterization, PhD thesis, TU Darmstadt and University of Stuttgart, 2006.
20. Nitzsche et al. , BPELlight, Proc. 5th International Conf. on Business Process Management (BPM), 2007.
21. Reichert and Dadam, ADEPTflex-Supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 10(2), 1998.
22. Eberle et al. , Process fragments, OTM Part I, 2009.
23. Karastoyanova and Leymann, Making scientific applications on the grid reliable through flexibility approaches borrowed from service compositions, In: Antonopoulos et al. (Eds. ), Handbook of research on P2P and grid systems for service-oriented computing: Models, methodologies and applications (Information Science Publishing, 2009).
24. Van Dongen et al. , The ProM framework: A new era in process mining tool support, LNCS, volume 3536, pages 444-454, Springer-Verlag, 2005. (Pubitemid 41422025)
25. Sonntag et al. , Process space-based scientific workflow enactment, International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management (IJBPIM), Special Issue on Scientific Workflows, Inderscience Publishers, 2010. (to appear)
26. McCarthy and Sarin, Workflow and transactions in InConcert, IEEE Bull. of the Tech. Com. on Data Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1993.
27. R. Siebert, An open architecture for adaptive workflow management systems, Proc. International Workshop on Issues and Applications in Database Technology (IADT), 1998.