Observer effects and avian-call-count survey quality: Rare-species biases and overconfidence

Auk

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 76-86

  Farmer, Robert G ^a   Leonard, Marty L ^a   Horn, Andrew G ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acoustic survey; Bias; Birds; Call count surveys; Citizen science; Detection; Nondetection; Observer effects

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC SURVEY; BIRD; DETECTION METHOD; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; INTERNET; VOCALIZATION; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

AVES;

EID: 84858643454     PISSN: 00048038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/auk.2012.11129     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alldredge, M. W., K. Pacifici, T. R. Simons, and K. H. Pollock. 2008. A novel field evaluation of the effectiveness of distance and independent observer sampling to estimate aural avian detection probabilities. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1349-1356.
2. Alldredge, M. W., T. R. Simons, and K. H. Pollock. 2007. Factors affecting aural detections of songbirds. Ecological Applications 17:948-955. (Pubitemid 46607446)
3. Balph, D. F., and M. H. Balph. 1983. On the psychology of watching birds: The problem of observer-expectancy bias. Auk 100:755-757.
4. Bart, J. 1985. Causes of recording errors in singing bird surveys. Wilson Bulletin 97:161-172.
5. Bart, J., and J. D. Schoultz. 1984. Reliability of singing bird surveys: Changes in observer efficiency with avian density. Auk 101:307-318.
6. Bates, D., and M. Maechler. 2010. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. [Online.] Available at cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index. html.
7. Bevier, L. R., A. F. Poole, and W. Moskoff. 2005. Veery (Catharus fuscescens). In The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. [Online.] Available at bna.birds.cornell.edu/ bna/species/142.
8. Callahan, J. S., A. L. Brownlee, M. D. Brtek, and H. L. Tosi. 2003. Examining the unique effects of multiple motivational sources on task performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33:2515-2535. (Pubitemid 38213881)
9. Campbell, M., and C. M. Francis. 2011. Using stereo-microphones to evaluate observer variation in North American Breeding Bird Survey point counts. Auk 128:303-312.
10. Croskerry, P. 2002. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: Cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Academic Emergency Medicine 9:1184-1204. (Pubitemid 35291548)
11. Dawson, D. K., and M. G. Efford. 2009. Bird population density estimated from acoustic signals. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:1201-1209.
12. De Solla, S. R., L. J. Shirose, K. J. Fernie, G. C. Barrett, C. S. Brousseau, and C. A. Bishop. 2005. Effect of sampling effort and species detectability on volunteer based anuran monitoring programs. Biological Conservation 121:585-594. (Pubitemid 39197534)
13. Diefenbach, D. R., D. W. Brauning, and J. A. Mattice. 2003. Variability in grassland bird counts related to observer differences and species detection rates. Auk 120:1168-1179. (Pubitemid 37387965)
14. Elphick, C. S. 2008. How you count counts: The importance of methods research in applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1313-1320.
15. Etterson, M. A., G. J. Niemi, and N. P. Danz. 2009. Estimating the effects of detection heterogeneity and overdispersion on trends estimated from avian point counts. Ecological Applications 19:2049-2066.
16. Faanes, C. A., and D. Bystrak. 1981. The role of observer bias in the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Pages 353-359 in Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds (C. J. Ralph and J. M. Scott, Eds.). Studies in Avian Biology, no. 6.
17. Fitzpatrick, M. C., E. L. Preisser, A. M. Ellison, and J. S. Elkinton. 2009. Observer bias and the detection of low-density populations. Ecological Applications 19:1673-1679.
18. Gelman, A., and J. Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
19. Genet, K. S., and L. G. Sargent. 2003. Evaluation of methods and data quality from a volunteer-based amphibian call survey. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:703-714. (Pubitemid 37298653)
20. Goffredo, S., F. Pensa, P. Neri, A. Orlandi, M. Scola Gagliardi, A. Velardi, C. Piccinetti, and F. Zaccanti. 2010. Unite research with what citizens do for fun: "Recreational monitoring" of marine biodiversity. Ecological Applications 20:2170-2187.
21. Hewson, C. M., A. Amar, J. A. Lindsell, R. M. Thewlis, S. Butler, K. Smith, and R. J. Fuller. 2007. Recent changes in bird populations in British broadleaved woodland. Ibis 149:14-28. (Pubitemid 350173544)
22. Johnson, D. H. 2008. In defense of indices: The case of bird surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:857-868. (Pubitemid 351656357)
23. Julliard, R., J. Clavel, V. Devictor, F. Jiguet, and D. Couvet. 2006. Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecology Letters 9:1237-1244. (Pubitemid 44571665)
24. Kepler, C. B., and J. M. Scott. 1981. Reducing bird count variability by training observers. Pages 366-371 in Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds (C. J. Ralph and J. M. Scott, Eds.). Studies in Avian Biology, no. 6.
25. Kery, M., and H. Schmid. 2006. Estimating species richness: Calibrating a large avian monitoring programme. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:101-110.
26. Kremen, C., K. S. Ullman, and R. W. Thorp. 2011. Evaluating the quality of citizen-scientist data on pollinator communities. Conservation Biology 25:607-617.
27. Lane, K. A., J. Kang, and M. R. Banaji. 2007. Implicit social cognition and law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:427-451.
28. Larrick, R. P., K. A. Burson, and J. B. Soll. 2007. Social comparison and confidence: When thinking you're better than average predicts overconfidence (and when it does not). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102:76-94. (Pubitemid 44943006)
29. Link, W. A., and J. R. Sauer. 1998. Estimating population change from count data: Application to the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Ecological Applications 8:258-268. (Pubitemid 28209602)
30. Lotz, A., and C. R. Allen. 2007. Observer bias in anuran call surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:675-679.
31. MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, M. E. Seamans, and R. J. Gutiérrez. 2009. Modeling species occurrence dynamics with multiple states and imperfect detection. Ecology 90:823-835.
32. Marsden, S. J. 1999. Estimation of parrot and hornbill densities using a point count distance sampling method. Ibis 141:377-390. (Pubitemid 29324142)
33. McClintock, B. T., L. L. Bailey, K. H. Pollock, and T. R. Simons. 2010a. Experimental investigation of observation error in anuran call surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:1882-1893.
34. McClintock, B. T., L. L. Bailey, K. H. Pollock, and T. R. Simons. 2010b. Unmodeled observation error induces bias when inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence via aural detections. Ecology 91:2446-2454.
35. McLaren, A. A., and M. D. Cadman. 1999. Can novice volunteers provide credible data for bird surveys requiring song identification? Journal of Field Ornithology 70:481-490. (Pubitemid 129314667)
36. Miller, D. A., J. D. Nichols, B. T. McClintock, E. H. Campbell Grant, L. L. Bailey, and L. A. Weir. 2011. Improving occupancy estimation when two types of observational error occur: Nondetection and species misidentification. Ecology 92:1422-1428.
37. Miller, D. T., and W. Turnbull. 1986. Expectancies and interpersonal processes. Annual Review of Psychology 37:233-256.
38. Moore, D. A., and P. J. Healy. 2008. The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review 115:502-517.
39. Pacifici, K., T. R. Simons, and K. H. Pollock. 2008. Effects of vegetation and background noise on the detection process in auditory avian point-count surveys. Auk 125:600-607.
40. Pellet, J., and B. R. Schmidt. 2005. Monitoring distributions using call surveys: Estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence. Biological Conservation 123:27-35. (Pubitemid 40033936)
41. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
42. Raitt, R. J. 1981. Chairman's introductory remarks: Observer variability. Page 326 in Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds (C. J. Ralph and J. M. Scott, Eds.). Studies in Avian Biology, no. 6.
43. Rempel, R. S., K. A. Hobson, G. Holborn, S. L. Van Wilgenburg, and J. Elliott. 2005. Bioacoustic monitoring of forest songbirds: Interpreter variability and effects of configuration and digital processing methods in the laboratory. Journal of Field Ornithology 76:1-11. (Pubitemid 40180871)
44. Robbins, C. S., and R. W. Stallcup. 1981. Problems in separating species with similar habits and vocalizations. Pages 360-365 in Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds (C. J. Ralph and J. M. Scott, Eds.). Studies in Avian Biology, no. 6.
45. Rosenstock, S. S., D. R. Anderson, K. M. Giesen, T. Leukering, and M. F. Carter. 2002. Landbird counting techniques: Current practices and an alternative. Auk 119:46-53. (Pubitemid 34231478)
46. Royle, J. A., and W. A. Link. 2006. Generalized site occupancy models allowing for false positive and false negative errors. Ecology 87:835-841.
47. Sauer, J. R., B. G. Peterjohn, and W. A. Link. 1994. Observer differences in the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Auk 111:50-62.
48. Shirose, L. J., C. A. Bishop, D. M. Green, C. J. MacDonald, R. J. Brooks, and N. J. Helferty. 1997. Validation tests of an amphibian call count survey technique in Ontario, Canada. Herpetologica 53:312-320. (Pubitemid 28102050)
49. Silvertown, J. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:467-471.
50. Simons, T. R., M. W. Alldredge, K. H. Pollock, and J. M. Wettroth. 2007. Experimental analysis of the auditory detection process on avian point counts. Auk 124:986-999. (Pubitemid 47237360)
51. Sullivan, B. L., C. L. Wood, M. J. Iliff, R. E. Bonney, D. Fink, and S. Kelling. 2009. eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation 142:2282-2292.
52. U.S. North American Bird Conservation Initiative Committee. 2010. The State of the Birds 2010. [Online.] Available at www.stateofthebirds.org/2010/ pdf-files/State%20 of%20the%20Birds-FINAL.pdf.
53. Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer, New York.
54. Ward-Paige, C. A., C. Mora, H. K. Lotze, C. Pattengill-Semmens, L. McClenachan, E. Arias-Castro, and R. A. Myers. 2010. Large-scale absence of sharks on reefs in the greater-Caribbean: A footprint of human pressures. PLoS ONE 5: e11968.
55. Weeks, H. P., Jr., and P. Harmon. 2011. Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis phoebe) In The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. [Online.] Available at bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/ species/094.