Mansfield's innovation in the theory of innovation

Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield: The Economics of R&D, Innovation, and Technological Change

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 281-290

  Audretsch, David B ^a   Lehmann, Erik E ^a,b  

^a Interaction Group   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

entrepreneurship; firm growth; university spillover

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858603138     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-25022-0_23     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Acs, Z., D. B. Audretsch, and M. Feldman, 1992, Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment, American Economic Review, 81, 363-367
2. Acs, Z., D. B. Audretsch, and M. Feldman, 1994, R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336-340
3. Adams, J.D., 2002, 'Comparative Localization of Academic and Industrial Spillovers,' Journal of Economic Geography 2, 253-278
4. Adams, J.D. and A.B. Jaffe, 2002, 'Bounding the Effects of R&D: An Investigation Using Matched Firm and Establishment Data,' Rand Journal of Economics 11, 700-721
5. Arrow, K., 1962, Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in R. Nelson (ed.). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 609-626
6. Audretsch, David B. 1995, Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge: MIT Press
7. Audretsch, D.B. and M.P. Feldman, 1996, 'R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production,' American Economic Review 86(3), June, 630-640
8. Audretsch, D.B. and P. E. Stephan, 1996, 'Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology,' American Economic Review 86(3), June, 641-652
9. Audretsch, D. B., and E. E. Lehmann, 2005, Do University Policies Make a Difference, Research Policy (forthcoming
10. Autant-Bernard, C, 2001a, Science and Knowledge Flows: Evidence from the French Case, Research Policy, 30, 1069-1078
11. Autant-Bernard, C, 2001b, The Geography of Knowledge Spillovers and Technological Proximity, Economic of Innovation and New Technology, 10, 237-254
12. Baldwin, W.L. and J.T. Scott, 1987, Market Structure and Technological Change, London and New York: Harwood Academic PubUshers
13. Black G., 2003, The Geography of Small Firm Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
14. Bound, J., C. Cummins, Z. GriHches, B.H. Hall, and A. Jaffe, 1984, 'Who Does R&D and Who Patents?,' in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 21-54
15. Chandler, A., 1977, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
16. Feldman, M., 1994, The Geography of Innovation, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
17. Fisher, P.M. and P. Temin, 1973, 'Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?,' Journal of Political Economy 81, 56-70
18. Galbraith, J.K., 1956, American Capitalism: The Concept of Coutervailing Power, revised edition, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
19. Grabowski, H.G., 1968, 'The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries,' Journal of Political Economy 76 (4), 292-306
20. Griliches, Z., 1992, The Search for Ri&D Spillovers, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29-47
21. Hall, B.H., A.N. Link, and J. T. Scott, 2003, Universities as Research Partners, Review of Economics and Statistics
22. Jaffe, A.B., 1986, Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits and Market Value,' American Economic Review 76, 984-1001
23. Jaffe, A.B., 1989, 'Real Effects of Academic Research,' American Economic Review 79(5), 957-970
24. Jaffe, A.B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson, 1993, Geographic LocaHzation of Knowledge Spillovers as evidenced by Patent Citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 63, 577-598
25. Kleinknecht, A., T.P. Poot, and J. O. N. Reijnen, 1991, Formal and Informal R&D and Firm Size, in Acs, Z. and D.B. Audretsch (eds): Innovation and Technological Change. An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 84-108
26. Kohn, M. and J.T. Scott, 1982, 'Scale Economies in Research and Development: The Schumpeterian Hypothesis,' Journal of Industrial Economics, 30, 239-249
27. Krugman, P., 1991, Geography and Trade, Cambridge: MIT Press
28. Link, A.N. and B. Bozeman, 1991, 'Innovative Behavior in Small-Sized Firms,' Small Business Economics 3(3), 179- 184
29. Link, A.N. and J. Rees, 1990, 'Firm Size, University Based Research, and the Returns to R&D,' Small Business Economics, 2(1), 25-32
30. Link, A.N., 1995, The Use of Literature-Based Innovation Output Indicators for Research Evaluation,' Small Business Economics 7(6), 451-455
31. Lucas, R. E., 2001, ExternaUties and Cities, Review of Economic Dynamics, 4, 245-475
32. Lucas, R. E. and E. Rossi-Hansberg, 2002, On the Internal Structure of Cities, Econometrica, 70, 1445-1476
33. Mansfield, E., 1968, Industrial Research and Technological Change, New York, NY: W.W. Norton, for the Cowles Foundation for Research Economics at Yale University, pp. 83-108
34. Mansfield, E., 1981, 'Composition of R&D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output,' Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, November, 610-615
35. Mansfield, E., 1983, 'Industrial Organization and Technological Change: Recent Empirical Findings,' in John V. Craven (ed.j. Industrial Organization, Antitrust, and Public Policy, The Hague: Kluwer-Nijhoff", pp. 129-143
36. Mansfield, E., 1984, 'Comment on Using Linked Patent and Ri&D Data to Measure Interindustry Technology Flows,' in Z. GriHches (ed.), RiScD, Patents, and Productivity, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 462-464
37. Mansfield, E.,1995, 'Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics, and Financing,' The Review of Economics and Statistics 11, 55-65
38. Mansfield, E., 1998, 'Academic Research and Industrial Innovation: An Update of Empirical Findings,' Research Policy 26 (7-8), 773-776
39. Mansfield, E., A. Romeo, M. Schwartz, D. Teece, S. Wagner and P. Brach, 1982, Technology Transfer, Productivity, and Economic Policy, New York: W. W. Norton
40. Marshall, A., 1920, Principles of Economics, 8- ed. London: MacMillan
41. Mueller, D.C., 1967, The Firm Decision Process: An Econometric Investigation,' Journal of Political Economy, 81(1), 58-87
42. Orlando, M.J., 2000, On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity for R&D Spillovers: An Empirical Investigation, Kansas: Federal Reserve Bank
43. Romer, P.M., 1986, Increasing Returns and Long run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037
44. SantarelU, E., and A. Sterlachinni, 1990, Innovation, Formal vs. Informal R&D, and Firm Size: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms, Small Business Economics, 2, 223-228
45. Scherer, F.M., 1965a, 'Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions,' American Economic Review 55, 1097-1125
46. Scherer, F.M., 1965b, 'Size of Firm, Oligopoly and Research: A Comment,' Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 31, 256-266
47. Scherer, F.M., 1967, 'Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers,' American Economic Review 57, 524-530
48. Scherer, F., M., 1982, 'Inter-Industry Technology Flows in the United States,' Research Policy, 11, 227-245
49. Scherer, F. M., 1983a, 'Concentration, R&D, and Productivity Change,' Southern Economic Journal 50, 221- 225
50. Scherer, F.M., 1983b, 'The Propensity to Patent/International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1 107-128
51. Scherer, P.M., 1984, Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 24-38
52. Scherer, F., M., 1988, Testimony before the Subcommittee
53. Schumpeter, J.A., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, on MonopoUes and Commercial Law,' Committee on New York, NY: Harper and Row. the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, February 24
54. Scott, J.T., 1984, Tirm Versus Industry Variability' in R&D
55. Scherer, F.M., 1991, 'Changing Perspectives on the Firm Intensity, in Z. Griuches (ed.), R&D, Patents and Produc- Size Problem,' in Z.J. Acs and D.B. Audretsch, (eds.), tivity, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 233- Innovation and Technological Change: An International 248