Use of positional information in sequence alignment for multiple classifier combination

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2096, Issue , 2001, Pages 388-398

  Marti, U V ^a   Bunke, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Handwriting recognition; Multiple classifier combination; Multiple sequence alignment; Positional information; String edit distance

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER RECOGNITION; DECISION THEORY; INFORMATION USE; PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS;

EDIT DISTANCE; HANDWRITING RECOGNITION; MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER COMBINATION; MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS; POSITIONAL INFORMATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84858448345     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48219-9_39     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. J. Kittler and F. Roli, editors. Multiple Classifier Systems, First Int. Workshop, MCS 2000. Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1857, 2000.
2. J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R.P.W. Duin, and J. Matas. On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(3):226-239, 1998.
3. L. Lam, Y.-S. Huang, and C.Y. Suen. Combination of multiple classifier decisions for optical character recognition. In H. Bunke and P.S.P. Wang, editors, Handbook of Character Recognition and Document Image Analysis, chapter 3, pages 79-101. World Scientific Publ. Co., 1997.
4. R.P.W. Duin and D.M.J. Tax. Experiments with classifier combining rules. In [1], pages 16-29, 2000.
5. B. Lazzerini, F. Marcelloni, and L.M. Reyneri. Beatrix: A self-learning system for off-line recognition of handwritten texts. Pattern Recognition Letters, 18(6):583-594, June 1997.
6. G. Kim, V. Govindaraju, and S.N. Srihari. Architecture for handwritten text recognition systems. In S.-W. Lee, editor,Advances in Handwriting Recognition, pages 163-172. World Scientific Publ. Co., 1999.
7. U. Marti and H. Bunke. Using a statistical language model to improve the performance of an HMM-based cursive handwriting recognition system. To appear in Int. Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2001.
8. R.H. Wagner and M. Fischer. The string-to-string correction problem. Journal of the ACM, 21(1):168-173, 1974.
9. J.B. Kruskal.An overview of sequence comparison: Time warps, string edits, and macromolecules. SIAM Review, 25(2):201-237, 1983.
10. D. Lopresti and J. Zhou.Using consensus sequence voting to correct OCR errors. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 67(1):39-47, July 1997.
11. T. Kohonen. Median strings. Pattern Recognition Letters, 3:309-313, 1985.
12. U. Marti and H. Bunke. Handwritten sentence recognition. In Proc. of the 15th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, Spain, volume 3, pages 467-470, 2000.
13. U. Marti. Offline Erkennung handgeschriebener Texte. PhD thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland, 2000.
14. U.-V. Marti and H. Bunke. A full English sentence database for off-line handwriting recognition. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition, Bangalore, India, pages 705-708, 1999.