Does AMS data from micaceous quartzite provide information about shape of the strain ellipsoid?

International Journal of Earth Sciences

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 693-703

  Mamtani, Manish A ^a   Vishnu, C S ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility; Mica; Pinning; Quartzite; Strain ellipsoid; Zener drag

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATOR MASS SPECTROMETRY; CORRELATION; DEFORMATION; DRAG; FOLIATION; GRAIN BOUNDARY; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MICA; QUARTZITE; RECRYSTALLIZATION;

MICAS;

EID: 84858437619     PISSN: 14373254     EISSN: 14373262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-011-0688-5     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Borradaile GJ, Alford C (1987) Relationship between magnetic susceptibility and strain in laboratory experiments. Tectonophysics 133: 121-135.
2. Borradaile GJ, Jackson M (2004) Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS): magnetic petrofabrics of deformed rocks. In: Martín-Hernández F, Lüneburg CM, Aubourg C, Jackson M (eds) Magnetic fabric: methods and applications. Geological Society of London Special Publications 238, pp 299-360.
3. Bouchez JL (1997) Granite is never isotropic: an introduction to AMS studies of granitic rocks. In: Bouchez JL, Hutton DWH, Stephens WE (eds) Granite: from segregation of melt to emplacement fabrics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 95-112.
4. de Wall H, Greiling RO, Sadek MF (2001) Post-collisional shortening in the late Pan-African Hamisana high strain zone, SE Egypt: field and magnetic fabric evidence. Precambrian Res 107: 79-194.
5. Fazio E, Punturo R, Cirrincione R (2010) Quartz c-axis texture mapping of mylonitic metapelite with rod structures (Calabria, southern Italy): clues for hidden shear flow direction. J Geol Soc India 75: 171-182.
6. Fry N (1979) Random point distributions and strain measurement in rocks. Tectonophysics 60: 89-105.
7. Ghosh M, Mukhopadhyay D, Sengupta P (2006) Pressure-temperature-deformation history for a part of the Mesoproterozoic fold belt in North Singhbhum, Eastern India. J Asian Earth Sci 26: 555-574.
8. Greiling RO, Verma PK (2001) Strike-slip tectonics and granitoid emplacement: an AMS fabric study from the Odenwald Crystalline Complex, SW Germany. Mineral Petrol 72: 165-184.
9. Greiling RO, Grimmer JC, de Wall H, Björk L (2007) Mesoproterozoic dyke swarms in foreland and nappes of the central Scandinavian Caledonides: structure, magnetic fabric and geochemistry. Geol Mag 144: 525-546.
10. Heilbronner R (2010) Mapping texture domains in quartzite microstructures. J Geol Soc India 75: 160-170.
11. Herwegh M, Berger A (2004) Deformation mechanisms in second-phase affected microstructures and their energy balance. J Struct Geol 26: 1483-1498.
12. Herwegh M, Kunze K (2002) The influence of nano-scale second-phase particles on deformation of fine grained calcite mylonites. J Struct Geol 24: 1463-1478.
13. Hirt AM, Lowrie W, Clendenen WS, Kligfield R (1988) Correlation of strain and the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in the Onaping Formation: evidence for a near-circular origin of the Sudbury Basin. Tectonophysics 225: 231-254.
14. Hrouda F (1986) The effect of quartz on the magnetic anisotropy of quartzite. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 30: 39-45.
15. Hrouda F (1993) Theoretical models of magnetic anisotropy to strain relationship revisited. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 77: 237-249.
16. Hrouda F (2004) Problems in interpreting AMS parameters in diamagnetic rocks. In: Martin-Hernández F, Lüneburg CM, Aubourg C, Jackson M (eds) Magnetic fabric: methods and applications. Geological Society of London Special Publications 238, pp 49-59.
17. Jelinek V (1981) Characterization of the magnetic fabric of rocks. Tectonophysics 79: T63-T67.
18. Launeau P, Robin PYF (1996) Fabric analysis using the intercept method. Tectonophysics 267: 91-119.
19. Launeau P, Bouchez JL, Benn K (1990) Shape preferred orientation of object populations: automatic analysis of digitized images. Tectonophysics 180: 201-211.
20. Li WB, Easterling KE (1990) The influence of particle shape on Zener drag. Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 38: 1045-1052.
21. Majumder S, Mamtani MA (2009) Magnetic fabric in the Malanjkhand Granite (central India)-implications for regional tectonics and Proterozoic suturing of the Indian shield. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 172: 310-323.
22. Mamtani MA, Greiling RO (2005) Granite emplacement and its relation with regional deformation in the Aravalli Mountain Belt (India)-inferences from magnetic fabric. J Struct Geol 27: 2008-2029.
23. Mamtani MA, Sengupta A (2009) Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility analysis of deformed kaolinite: implications for evaluating landslides. Int J Earth Sci 98: 1721-1725.
24. Mamtani MA, Sengupta P (2010) Significance of AMS analysis in evaluating superposed folds in quartzites. Geol Mag 147: 910-918.
25. Mamtani MA, Greiling RO, Karanth RV, Merh SS (1999) Orogenic deformation and its relation with AMS fabric-an example from the southern Aravalli mountain belt, India. In: Radhakrihsna T, Piper JD (eds) The Indian subcontinent and Gondwana: a palaeomagnetic and rock magnetic perspective, vol 44. Geological Society of India Memoir, Bangalore, pp 9-24.
26. Mukherji A, Chaudhuri AK, Mamtani MA (2004) Regional scale strain variations in the Banded Iron Formations of eastern India: results from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility studies. J Struct Geol 26: 2175-2189.
27. Naha K (1965) Metamorphism in relation to stratigraphy, structure and movements in parts of east Singhbhum, eastern India. Q J Geol Min Metall Soc India 37: 41-95.
28. Nes E, Ryum N, Hunderi O (1985) On the Zener drag. Acta Metall 33: 11-22.
29. Olgaard DL, Evans B (1988) Grain growth in synthetic marbles with added mica and water. Contrib Mineral Petrol 100: 246-260.
30. Panozzo R (1987) Two-dimensional strain determination by the inverse SURFOR wheel. J Struct Geol 9: 115-119.
31. Piazolo S, Passchier CW (2002) Controls on lineation development in low to medium grade shear zones: a study from the Cap de Creus peninsula, NE Spain. J Struct Geol 24: 25-44.
32. Prior DJ, Boyle AP, Brenker F, Cheadle MC, Day A, Lopez G, Peruzzo L, Potts GJ, Reddy S, Spiess R, Timms NE, Trimby P, Wheeler J, Zetterström L (1999) The application of electron backscatter diffraction and orientation contrast imaging in the SEM to textural problems in rocks. Am Mineral 84: 1741-1759.
33. Rabkin E (1998) Zener drag in the case of anisotropic grain boundary energy. Scr Mater 39: 1631-1637.
34. Ramsay JG, Huber MI (1983) The Techniques of modern structural geology, volume 1: strain analysis. Academic Press, New York.
35. Saha AK (1994) Crustal evolution of Singhbhum-North Orissa, Eastern India, vol 27. Geological Society of India Memoir, Bangalore, p 341.
36. Schmid SM (1982) Microfabric studies as indicators of deformation mechanisms and flow laws operative in mountain building. In: Hsu KJ (ed) Mountain building processes. Academic Press, London, pp 95-110.
37. Sen K, Mamtani MA (2006) Magnetic fabric, shape preferred orientation and regional strain in granitic rocks. J Struct Geol 28: 1870-1882.
38. Sen K, Majumder S, Mamtani MA (2005) Degree of magnetic anisotropy as a strain intensity gauge in ferromagnetic granites. J Geol Soc London 162: 583-586.
39. Song WJ, Ree JH (2007) Effect of mica on the grain size of dynamically recrystallized quartz in a quartzemuscovite mylonite. J Struct Geol 29: 1872-1881.
40. Tarling DH, Hrouda F (1993) The magnetic anisotropy of rocks. Chapman and Hall, London.
41. Twiss RJ, Moores EM (2007) Structural geology. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
42. Vishnu CS, Mamtani MA, Basu A (2010) AMS, ultrasonic P-wave velocity and rock strength analysis in quartzites devoid of mesoscopic foliations-implications for rock mechanics studies. Tectonophysics 494: 191-200.