Automatic metaphor interpretation as a paraphrasing task

NAACL HLT 2010 - Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1029-1037

  Shutova, Ekaterina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OTHER APPLICATIONS; SELECTIONAL PREFERENCES;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84858425911     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. R. Agerri, J.A. Barnden, M.G. Lee, and A.M. Wallington. 2007. Metaphor, inference and domain-independent mappings. In Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP-2007), pages 17-23, Borovets, Bulgaria.
2. O. E. Andersen, J. Nioche, E. Briscoe, and J. Carroll. 2008. The BNC parsed with RASP4UIMA. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC'08), Marrakech, Morocco.
3. J.A. Barnden and M.G. Lee. 2002. An artificial intelligence approach to metaphor understanding. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 6(1):399-412.
4. E. Briscoe, J. Carroll, and R. Watson. 2006. The second release of the rasp system. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive presentation sessions, pages 77-80.
5. L. Burnard. 2007. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML Edition). URL=http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/XMLedition/URG/.
6. *: A method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics, 17(1):49-90.
7. J. Feldman and S. Narayanan. 2004. Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2):385-392. (Pubitemid 38447186)
8. C. Fellbaum, editor. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database (ISBN: 0-262-06197-X). MIT Press, first edition.
9. D. Hofstadter and M. Mitchell. 1994. The Copycat Project: A model of mental fluidity and analogymaking. In K.J. Holyoak and J. A. Barnden, editors, Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory, Ablex, New Jersey.
10. D. Hofstadter. 1995. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. HarperCollins Publishers.
11. G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. J. H. Martin. 1988. Representing regularities in the metaphoric lexicon. In Proceedings of the 12th conference on Computational linguistics, pages 396-401.
13. J. H. Martin. 1990. A Computational Model of Metaphor Interpretation. Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
14. S. Narayanan. 1997. Knowledge-based action representations for metaphor and aspect (KARMA). Technical report, PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley.
15. S. Narayanan. 1999. Moving right along: A computational model of metaphoric reasoning about events. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 99), pages 121-128, Orlando, Florida.
16. Pragglejaz Group (P. Crisp, R. Gibbs, A. Cienki, G. Low, G. Steen, L. Cameron, E. Semino, J. Grady, A. Deignan and Z. Kovecses). 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22:1-39.
17. P. Resnik. 1993. Selection and Information: A Classbased Approach to Lexical Relationships. Ph.D. thesis, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
18. P. Resnik. 1997. Selectional preference and sense disambiguation. In ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Tagging Text with Lexical Semantics, Washington, D.C.
19. S. Siegel and N. J. Castellan. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA.
20. L. Sun and A. Korhonen. 2009. Improving verb clustering with automatically acquired selectional preferences. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 638-647, Singapore, August.
21. T. Veale and Y. Hao. 2008. A fluid knowledge representation for understanding and generating creative metaphors. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), pages 945-952, Manchester, UK.
22. Y. Wilks. 1978. Making preferences more active. Artificial Intelligence, 11(3):197-223.