Modelling the substitutability of discourse connectives

ACL-05 - 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 149-156

  Hutchinson, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

DISCOURSE PARSING; DISTRIBUTIONAL SIMILARITIES;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

EID: 84858419340     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1219840.1219859     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Nicholas Asher and Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press.
2. James R. Curran and M. Moens. 2002. Improvements in automatic thesaurus extraction. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Unsupervised Lexical Acquisition, Philadelphia, USA.
3. Gregory Grefenstette. 1994. Explorations in Automatic Thesaurus Discovery. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
4. Brigitte Grote and Manfred Stede. 1998. Discourse marker choice in sentence planning. In Eduard Hovy, editor, Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 128-137, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. M. Halliday and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. Longman.
6. Jerry A Hobbs. 1985. On the coherence and structure of discourse.Technical Report CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
7. Ben Hutchinson. 2004a. Acquiring the meaning of discourse markers. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2004), pages 685-692.
8. Ben Hutchinson. 2004b. Mining the web for discourse markers. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), pages 407-410, Lisbon, Portugal.
9. Ben Hutchinson. 2005. Modelling the similarity of discourse connectives. To appear in Proceedings of the the 27th AnnualMeeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci2005).
10. Andrew Kehler. 2002. Coherence, Reference and the Theory of Grammar. CSLI publications.
11. Alistair Knott. 1996. A data-driven methodology for motivating a set of coherence relations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
12. Mirella Lapata and Alex Lascarides. 2004. Inferring sentenceinternal temporal relations. In In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
13. Lillian Lee. 1999. Measures of distributional similarity. In Proceedings of ACL 1999.
14. Daniel Marcu and Abdessamad Echihabi. 2002. An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-2002), Philadelphia, PA.
15. Daniel Marcu. 2000. The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. The MIT Press.
16. Scott McDonald. 2000. Environmental determinants of lexical processing effort. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
17. George A. Miller and William G. Charles. 1991. Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(1):1-28.
18. M. Moser and J. Moore. 1995. Using discourse analysis and automatic text generation to study discourse cue usage. In Proceedings of the AAAI 1995 Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation.
19. Philip Resnik and Mona Diab. 2000. Measuring verb similarity. In Proceedings of the Twenty Second Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Philadelphia, US, August.
20. Philip Resnik. 1999. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:95-130. (Pubitemid 129628761)
21. H. Rubenstein and J. B. Goodenough. 1965. Contextual correlates of synonymy. Computational Linguistics, 8:627-633.
22. Advaith Siddharthan. 2003. Preserving discourse structure when simplifying text. In Proceedings of the 2003 European Natural Language Generation Workshop.
23. Julie Weeds and David Weir. 2003. A general framework for distributional similarity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2003), Sapporo, Japan, July.
24. Sholom M.Weiss and Casimir A. Kulikowski. 1991. Computer systems that learn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.