Why member portraits can undermine participation

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years - Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, CSCL 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 86-90

  Cress, Ulrike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anonymity; Group awareness tools; Information exchange dilemma; Member portraits; Participation; SIDE Model

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

ANONYMITY; GROUP AWARENESS; INFORMATION EXCHANGES; MEMBER PORTRAITS; PARTICIPATION; SIDE MODELS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84858414019     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1149293.1149305     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. F. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23 (5), 687-710.
2. Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Rossen, M. B., & McCrickard, D. S. (2003). Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. International Journal of Human-.Computer Studies, 58, 605-632.
3. Cress, U., Barquero, B., Buder, J. & Hesse, F. W. (in press). Social dilemmas in knowledge communication via shared databases. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computermediated knowledge communication - and how they may be overcome. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Cress, U. & Hesse, F. W. (2004). Knowledge sharing in groups: Experimental findings of how to overcome a social dilemma. In Y. Kafai, W. Sandoval, N. Enydey, A. S. Nixon & F. Herrera, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (p. 150-157). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
6. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
7. Lea, M., Spears, R. & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 (5), 526-537.
8. Lee, E.-J. (2004). Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer-mediated communication. Experimental tets of the social identity model of Deindividuation effects. Human Communication Research, 30 (2), 234-259. (Pubitemid 39056972)
9. Lee, E.-J. & Nass, C. (2002). Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication: When interacting via computers differs from interacting with computers. Human Communication Research, 28 (3), 349-381. (Pubitemid 37496226)
10. McClintock, C. G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement, and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12k, 121-137.
11. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M. & Reicher, S. (2000). SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
12. Spears, R., Lea, M. & Postmes, T. (2000). One side: Purview, problems and prospects. In T. Postmes, R. Spears, M. Lea, & S. Reicher (Eds.), SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of deindividuation in groups (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
13. Thorn, B. K. & Connolly, T. (1987). Discretionary data bases: A theory and some experimental findings. Communication Research, 14 (5), 512-528.
14. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
15. Van Lange, P. V. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N. & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of Prosocial, Individualistic, and Competitive Orientations: Theory and Preliminary Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (4), 733-746. (Pubitemid 127688977)