Aggregation via set partitioning for natural language generation

HLT-NAACL 2006 - Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 359-366

  Barzilay, Regina ^a   Lapata, Mirella ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; INFERENCE ENGINES;

AGGREGATION RULES; LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE; LOCAL INFORMATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; SET PARTITIONING; SET PARTITIONING PROBLEM;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84858412595     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1220835.1220881     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. R. Barzilay, M. Lapata. 2005. Collective content selection for concept-to-text generation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 331-338, Vancouver.
2. H. Cheng, C. Mellish. 2000. Capturing the interaction between aggregation and text planning in two generation systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Natural Language Generation Conference, 186-193, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel.
3. T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest. 1992. Intoduction to Algorithms. The MIT Press.
4. H. Dalianis. 1999. Aggregation in natural language generation. Computational Intelligence, 15(4):384-414.
5. B. Di Eugenio, D. Fossati, D. Yu. 2005. Aggregation improves learning: Experiments in natural language generation for intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 50-57, Ann Arbor, MI.
6. E. H. Hovy. 1990. Unresolved issues in paragraph planning. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, M. Zock, eds., Current Research in Natural Language Generation, 17-41. Academic Press, New York.
7. T. Marciniak, M. Strube. 2005. Beyond the pipeline: Discrete optimization in NLP. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 136-143, Ann Arbor, MI.
8. V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, W. Yih, D. Zimak. 2004. Semantic role labeling via integer linear programming inference. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1346-1352, Geneva, Switzerland.
9. M. Reape, C. Mellish. 1999. Just what is aggregation anyway? In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, 20-29, Toulouse, France.
10. E. Reiter, R. Dale. 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. D. Roth, W. Yih. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 1-8, Boston, MA.
12. D. Scott, C. S. de Souza. 1990. Getting the message across in RST-based text generation. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, M. Zock, eds., Current Research in Natural Language Generation, 47-73. Academic Press, New York.
13. J. Shaw. 1998. Clause aggregation using linguistic knowledge. In Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, 138-147, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada.
14. M. A. Walker, O. Rambow, M. Rogati. 2001. Spot: A trainable sentence planner. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 17-24, Pittsburgh, PA.
15. J. Wilkinson. 1995. Aggregation in natural language generation: Another look. Technical report, Computer Science Department, University of Waterloo, 1995.
16. A. S. Yeung. 1999. Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading comprehension tasks with vocabulary definitions. Journal of Experimental Education, 67(3):197-218.