Comparative anatomical and developmental analysis of dry and fleshy fruits of Solanaceae

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 98, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1415-1436

  Pabón Mora, Natalia ^a,b   Litt, Amy ^a  

^a NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Berries; Capsules; Cestrum; Datura; Fruit anatomy; Fruit development; Iochroma; Nicotiana; Petunia; Solanum

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; CYTOLOGY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FRUIT; ONTOGENY; PHYLOGENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; SOLANACEAE;

SOLANACEAE;

CESTRUM; DATURA; IOCHROMA; NICOTIANA; PETUNIA; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM;

EID: 84858376023     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1100097     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Ascher, P. D. 1984. Self-incompatibility. In K. C. Sink [ed.], Petunia: Monographs on theoretical and applied genetics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
2. Benítez de Rojas, C., and W. G. D'Arcy. 1998. The genera Cestrum and Sessea (Solanaceae: Cestreae) in Venezuela. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 273-351.
3. Bernardello, L. M. 1983. Estudios en Lycium (Solanaceae). III. Estructura y desarrollo de fruto y semilla en Lycium y Grabowskia. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 22: 147-176.
4. Bitter, G. 1911. Steinzellkonkretionen im Fruchtfleisch beerentragender Solanaceen und deren systematische Bedeutung. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 45: 483-507.
5. Bondeson, W. E. 1986. Gynoecial morphology and funicular germination plugs in the Nolanaceae. Nordic Journal of Botany 6: 183-198.
6. Bordzilowski, J. 1888. De la manière du développement des fruits charnus et baies. Mémoires de la Sociétédes Naturalistes de Kieff 9: 65-106.
7. Bremer, B., K. Andreasen, and D. Olson. 1995. Subfamilial and tribal relationships in the Rubiaceae based on the rbc L sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 383-397.
8. Bremer, B., and O. Eriksson. 1992. Evolution of fruit characters and dispersal modes in the tropical family Rubiaceae. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 47: 79-95.
9. Carrizo-García, C. 1998. Sobre el androceo y el gineceo en la tribu Datureae (Solanaceae) y su implicancia taxonómica. Kurtziana 26: 33-53.
10. Cave, C. 1869. Structure et développement du fruit. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique 10: 123-190.
11. Charini, F., and G. Barboza. 2007. Anatomical study of different fruit types in Argentine species of Solanum subgen. Leptostemonum (Solanaceae). Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 64: 165-175.
12. Charini, F., and G. Barboza. 2009. Fruit anatomy of species of Solanum sect. Acanthophora (Solanaceae). Flora 204: 146-156.
13. Clausing, G., K. Meyer, and S. Renner. 2000. Correlations among fruit traits and evolution of different fruits within Melastomataceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 303-326.
14. Cox, H. T. 1948. Studies in the comparative anatomy of the Ericales. II. Ericaceae, subfamily Arbutoideae. American Midland Naturalist 40: 493-516.
15. Cutler, D. F., C. E. J. Botha, and D. W. Stevenson. 2008. Plant anatomy: An applied approach. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Massachusets, USA.
16. Dave, Y. S., N. D. Patel, and K. S. Rao. 1979a. Developmental and anatomical studies in the pericarp of capsicums. Flora 168: 263-275.
17. Dave, Y. S., N. D. Patel, and K. S. Rao. 1979b. The study of origin of pericarp layers in Solanum melongena. Phyton 19: 233-241.
18. Dave, Y. S., N. D. Patel, and K. S. Rao. 1980a. Morpho-histogenesis in the fruit sculpture of Datura inoxia. Phyton 20: 227-234.
19. Dave, Y. S., N. D. Patel, and K. S. Rao. 1980b. Origin, development and structure of spiny projections on the pericarp Datura inoxia Mill. Feddes Repertorium 91: 89-93.
20. Dave, Y. S., N. D. Patel, and K. S. Rao. 1980c. Structural design of the fruit of Solanum tuberosum L. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Sciences 89: 369-374.
21. Dave, Y. S., N. D. Patel, and K. S. Rao. 1981. Structural design of the developing fruit of Nicotiana tabacum. Phyton 21: 63-71.
22. Dottori, N. 1995. Desarrollo y estructura de fruto y semilla en Solanum sect. Cyphomandropsis (Solanaceae) de Argentina. Kurtziana 24: 83-104.
23. Dottori, N. 1998. Anatomía y ontogenia de fruto y semilla de Solanum juvenale (Solanaceae). Kurtziana 26: 13-22.
24. Dottori, N., and M. T. Cosa. 1999. Anatomía y ontogenia de fruto y semilla en Solanum hieronymi (Solanaceae). Kurtziana 27: 293-302.
25. Dottori, N., and M. T. Cosa. 2007. Anatomía y desarrollo de fruto y semilla de Solanum palinacanthum (Solanaceae). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 78: 359-367.
26. Eames, A. J., and L. H. MacDaniels. 1947. An introduction to plant anatomy, 2nd ed. McGraw Hill, New York, New York, USA.
27. Endress, P. K. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Esau, K. 1967. Plant anatomy, 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
29. Eyde, R. H. 1966. Systematic anatomy of the flower and fruit of Corokia. American Journal of Botany 53: 833-847.
30. Farmer, J. B. 1889. Contributions to the morphology and physiology of pulpy fruits. Annals of Botany 3: 349-414.
31. Fay, M. F., R. G. Olmstead, J. R. Richardson, E. Santiago-Valentin, G. T. Prance, and M. W. Chase. 1998. Molecular data support the inclusion of Duckeodendron cestroides in Solanaceae. Kew Bulletin 53: 203-212.
32. Filippa, E. M., and L. M. Bernardello. 1992. Estructura y desarrollo de fruto y semilla en especies de Athenaea, Aureliana y Capsicum (Solaneae, Solanaceae). Darwiniana 31: 137-150.
33. Francey, P. 1935. Monographie du genre Cestrum L. Candollea 6: 46-398.
34. Francey, P. 1936. Monographie du genre Cestrum L., partie II. Candollea 7: 1-132.
35. Garcin, A. G. 1888. Sur le fruit des Solanées. Le Journal de Botanique 2: 108-115.
36. Garcin, A. G. 1890. Recherches sur l'histogénèse des péricarpes charnus. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique 12: 175-401.
37. Gillaspy, G., H. Ben-David, and W. Gruissem. 1993. Fruits: A developmental perspective. Plant Cell 5: 1439-1451.
38. Givnish, T. J., J. C. Pires, S. W. Graham, M. A. Mcpherson, L. M. Prince, T. B. Patterson, H. S. Rai, et al. 2005. Repeated evolution of net venation and fleshy fruits among monocots in shaded habitats confirms a priori predictions: Evidence from ndhF phylogeny. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 272: 1481-1490.
39. Goodspeed, T. H. 1982. The genus Nicotiana: Origins, relationships and evolution of its species in the light of their distribution, morphology and cytogenetics. A. J. Reprints Agency, New Delhi, India.
40. Hayward, H. E. 1938. The structure of economic plants. MacMillan, New York, New York, USA.
41. Houel, C., R. Bounon, J. Chaïb, C. Guichard, J.-P. Péros, R. Bacilieri, A. Dereeper, et al. 2010. Patterns of sequence polymorphism in the fleshless berry locus in cultivated and wild Vitis vinifera accessions. BMC Plant Biology 10: 284.
42. Houghtaling, H. 1935. A developmental analysis of size and shape in tomato fruits. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 62: 243-252.
43. Huber, K. A. 1980. Morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Blüten und Blütenständen von Solanaceen und von Nolana paradoxa Lindl. (Nolanaceae). A. R. Gantner Verlag K. G., Vaduz, Liechtenstein.
44. Hunziker, A. T. 2001. The genera of Solanaceae. A. R. G. Gantner Verlag K. G., Ruggell, Liechtenstein.
45. Johansen, D. A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw Hill, New York, New York, USA.
46. Klemt, F. 1907. Über den Bau und die Entwicklung einiger Solanaceenfr ü chte. Diss. Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Berlin, Germany.
47. Knapp, S. 2002. Tobacco to tomatoes: A phylogenetic perspective on fruit diversity in the Solanaceae. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 2001-2022.
48. Knoll, F. 1939. Über den Begriff Frucht. Der Biologe 8: 154-160.
49. Kraus, J. E., H. C. De Souza, M. H. Rezende, N. M. Castro, C. Vecchi, and R. Luque. 1998. Astra blue and basic fuchsin double staining of plant material. Biotechnic & Histochemistry 73: 235-243.
50. Lammers, T. G. 2007. Campanulaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], Families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 8, 26-56. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
51. Liu, M., G. M. Plunkett, and P. P. Lowry II. 2010. Fruit anatomy provides structural synapomorphies to help define Myodocarpaceae (Apiales). Systematic Botany 35: 675-681.
52. Liu, M., L. Shi, B.-E. Van Wyk, and P. M. Tilney. 2003. Fruit anatomy of the genus Bupleurum (Apiaceae) in northeastern China and notes on systematic implications. South African Journal of Botany 69: 151-157.
53. Maácz, G. J., and E. Vágás. 1961. A new method for staining cellulose and lignified cell walls. Microscopie 16: 40-43.
54. Maheshwari, P. 1950. Embryology of angiosperms. McGraw Hill, New York, New York, USA.
55. Martin, C., M. Parrado, and M. Arias. 2001. Anatomía de hoja y fruto de Cestrum strigillatum Ruiz et Pav. (Solanaceae). Lilloa 40: 215-222.
56. Mohana Rao, P. R. 1983. Seed and fruit anatomy in Eupomatia laurina with a discussion of the affinities of Eupomatiaceae. Flora 173: 311-319.
57. Mohana Rao, P. R. 1986a. Seed and fruit anatomy in Gyrocarpus americanus with a discussion on the affinities of Hernandiaceae. Israel Journal of Botany 35: 133-152.
58. Mohana Rao, P. R. 1986b. Seed and fruit anatomy in Cercidiphyllum japonicum with a discussion on the affinities of Cercidiphyllaceae. Flora 178: 243-249.
59. Mulla, R. M., Y. Dave, and B. Kazi. 2005. Structure and development of the pericarps of Cestrum diurnum and Cestrum nocturnum. Phytomorphology 55: 203-210.
60. Munting, A. J. 1974. Development of flower and fruit of Capsicum annuum L. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 23: 415-432.
61. Murray, M. A. 1945. Carpellary and placental structure in the Solanaceae. Botanical Gazette 107: 243-260.
62. Nee, M. 2004. Solanaceae. In N. Smith, S. A. Mori, A. Henderson, D. Wm. Stevenson, and S. V. Heald [eds.], Flowering plants of the neotropics, 355-357. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA.
63. Nhã, T., and S. Danert. 1973. Über die Fruchtentwicklung undüber zentrische Leitbündel in der Gattung Datura (Solanaceae). Die Kulturpflanze 21: 119-193.
64. Oganezova, G. G. 1990. Seed and fruit anatomy of some Amaryllidaceae in connection with their systematics and phylogeny. Botaničeskij Žurnal 75: 615-630.
65. Oliver, E. G. H. 2000. Systematics of Ericeae (Ericaceae-Ericoideae): Species with indehiscent and partially dehiscent fruits. Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium 19: 1-483.
66. Olmstead, R. G., L. Bohs, H. A. Migid, E. Santiago-Valentin, V. F. García, and S. M. Collier. 2008. A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae. Taxon 54: 1159-1181.
67. Pak, J.-H., J.-K. Park, and S. S. Whang. 2001. Systematic implications of fruit wall anatomy and surface sculpturing of Microseris. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 209-220.
68. Peralta, I. E., D. M. Spooner, and S. Knapp. 2008. Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect. Lycopersicoides, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 84: 1-186.
69. Plunkett, G., D. E. Soltis, and P. S. Soltis. 1997. Clarification of the relationship between Apiaceae and Araliaceae based on matK and rbcL sequence data. American Journal of Botany 82: 520-525.
70. Primack, R. B. 1987. Relationships among flowers, fruits and seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 409-430.
71. Richard, L.-C. 1819. Observations on the structure of fruits and seeds. Translated from Analyse du Fruit by J. Lindley. John Harding, London, UK.
72. Rodriguez, I. 2000. Flower anatomy and morphology of Exodeconus maritimus (Solanaceae, Solaneae) and Nicandra physalodes (Solanaceae, Nicandreae): Importance for their systematic relationships. Adansonia 22: 187-199.
73. Ronse DeCraene, L. P., S.-P. Hong, and E. Smets. 2000. Systematic significance of fruit morphology and anatomy in tribes Persicarieae and Polygoneae (Polygonaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 134: 301-337.
74. Roth, I. 1977. Fruits of angiosperms. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, Germany.
75. Sachs, J. 1874. Textbook of botany, morphological and physical. Translated from Lehrbuch der Botanik. Leipzig and annotated by A. W. Bennett and W. T. Thiselton. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
76. Santiago-Valentin, E., and R. G. Olmstead. 2003. Phylogenetics of the Antillean Goetzeoideae (Solanaceae) and their relationships within the Solanaceae based on chloroplast and ITS DNA sequence data. Systematic Botany 28: 452-460.
77. Shibuya, K., K. G. Barry, J. A. Ciardi, H. M. Loucas, B. A. Underwood, S. Nourizadeh, J. R. Ecker, et al. 2004. The central role of PhEIN2 in ethylene responses throughout plant development in petunia. Plant Physiology 136: 2900-2912.
78. Spalik, K., A. Wojewódzka, and S. R. Downie. 2001. The evolution of fruit in Scandiceae subtribe Scandicinae (Apiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 1358-1374.
79. Spujt, R. W. 1994. A systematic treatment of fruit types. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 70: 1-181.
80. Sterling, C. 1953. Developmental anatomy of the fruit of Prunus domestica L. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 80: 457-477.
81. Tanksley, S. D. 2004. The genetic, developmental and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell 16 (supplement): S181-S189.
82. Troll, W. 1928. Organization und Gestalt im Bereich der Blüte. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
83. Weber, A. 2004. Gesneriaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], Families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 7, 63-158. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
84. Wiemer, A. P., M. T. Cosa, and N. Dottori. 2004. Desarrollo y estructura de fruto y semilla de Salpichroa origanifolia (Solanaceae). Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 39: 41-50.