The practical research on flood risk analysis based on IIOSM and fuzzy α-cut technique

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 3271-3282

  Zou, Qiang ^a   Zhou, Jianzhong ^a   Zhou, Chao ^a   Song, Lixiang ^a   Guo, Jun ^a   Liu, Yi ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Flood disaster; Fuzzy cut; Fuzzy expected values; Fuzzy risk; IIOSM; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL RESULTS; FLOOD DISASTER; FLOOD PROTECTION; FLOOD RISK ANALYSIS; FLOOD RISKS; FUZZY EXPECTED VALUE; FUZZY EXPECTED VALUES; FUZZY RISK; GUANGDONG PROVINCE; IIOSM; INFORMATION DIFFUSION; NATURAL HAZARD; RISK PREFERENCE; RISK VALUE; TECHNICAL CONDITIONS;

FLOOD CONTROL; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RISK ANALYSIS;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 84858336998     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. World disaster report. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
2. P.G. Samuels, A European perspective on current challenges in the analysis of inland flood risks, in: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures, Springer, 2004, pp. 21-34.
3. Alexander D.E. Natural disasters 1993, Kluwer Academic Publishers, [pp. 141-144].
4. Z.Y. Wang, E.J. Plate, Recent flood disasters in China, in: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water and maritime Engineering, 154, 2002, pp. 177-188.
5. Zhang J.Q., Zhou C.H., Xu K.Q., Watanabe M. Flood disaster monitoring and evaluation in China. Environ. Hazards 2002, 4:33-43.
6. Karimi I., Hüllermeier E. Risk assessment system of natural hazards: a new approach based on fuzzy probability. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2007, 158:987-999.
7. Kahraman C. Risk analysis and crisis response. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk. Assess. 2009, 23:413-414.
8. Konecny F., Nachtnebel H.P. Extreme value processes and the evaluation of risk in flood analysis. Appl. Math. Model. 1985, 9:11-15.
9. Gaume E., Gaál L., Viglione A., Szolgay J., Kohnová S., Blöschl G. Bayesian MCMC approach to regional flood frequency analyses term involving extraordinary previous term flood term events at ungauged sites. J. Hydrol. 2010, 394:101-117.
10. Zoppou C., Roberts S. Numerical solution of the two-dimensional unsteady dam break. Appl. Math. Model. 2000, 24:457-475.
11. L.X. Song, J.Z. Zhou, Q. Zou, J. Guo, Y. Liu, Two-Dimensional dam-break flood simulation on unstructured meshes, in: Proceedings 2010 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, 2010, pp.465-469.
12. Andrade M.G., Fragoso M.D., Carneiro A.A. A stochastic approach to the flood control problem. Appl. Math. Model. 2001, 25:499-511.
13. Feng L.H., Hong W.H. On the principle of maximum entropy and the risk analysis of disaster loss. Appl. Math. Model. 2009, 33:2934-2938.
14. Huang Z.W., Zhou J.Z., Song L.X., Lu Y.L., Zhang Y.C. Flood disaster loss comprehensive evaluation model based on optimization support vector machine. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2010, 37:3810-3814.
15. He Y.Y., Zhou J.Z., Kou P.G., Lu N., Zou Q. A fuzzy clustering iterative model using chaotic differential evolution algorithm for evaluating flood disaster. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:10060-10065.
16. Bedford T., Cooke R. Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods 2003, World Publishing Corporation, Beijing.
17. Schepper A.D., Heijen B. How to estimate the value at risk under incomplete information. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2010, 233:2213-2226.
18. Feng L.H., Luo G.Y. Flood risk analysis based on information diffusion theory. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2008, 14:1330-1337.
19. Huang C.F. Information diffusion techniques and small-sample problem. Int. J. Inf. Tech. Decis. 2002, 1:229-249.
20. Huang C.F. Principle of information diffusion. Fuzzy. Sets. Syst. 1997, 91:69-90.
21. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8:338-353.
22. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy. Sets. Syst. 1978, 1:3-28.
23. C.F. Huang, Concepts and methods of fuzzy risk analysis, in: Proceedings of the First China-Japan Conference on Risk Assessment and Management, Beijing, International Academic Publishers, 1998, pp. 12-23.
24. T. Zong, Improvement on interior-outer-set model for estimating fuzzy probability, in: Proceedings of 2004 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, Banff, Canada 2004, pp. 578-583.
25. Wang X.Z., You Y.S., Tang Y.J. An approach to calculate optimal window-width serving for the information diffusion technique. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 2004, 33:223-231.
26. Liu X.P., Zhang J.Q., Cai W.Y., Tong Z.J. Information diffusion-based spatio-temporal risk analysis of grassland fire disaster in northern China. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2010, 23:53-60.
27. Feng L.H., Luo G.Y. Analysis on fuzzy risk of landfall typhoon in Zhejiang province of China. Math. Comput. Simulat. 2009, 79:3258-3266.
28. Feng L.H., Hong W.H., Wan Z. The application of fuzzy risk in researching flood disasters. Nat. Hazards 2010, 53:413-423.
29. Zhang J.X., Huang C.F. Cartographic representation of the uncertainty related to natural disaster risk: overview and state of the art, data mining and knowledge management. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2005, 3327:213-220.
30. Zadeh L.A. Soft computing and fuzzy logic. IEEE Software 1994, 3:48-56.
31. Huang C.F. A demonstration of reliability of the interior-outer-set model. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 2004, 33:205-222.
32. Shen Q., Zhao R.Q. Risk assessment of serious crime with fuzzy random theory. Inform. Sci. 2010, 180:4401-4411.
33. J.J. Cohrssen and V.T. Covello, Risk analysis: a Guide to Principles and Methods for Analyzing Health and Environmental Risks. National Technical Information Service, 1989.
34. accessed on 02.03.11. http://www.fswater.gov.cn.
35. Zhang J.X., Huang C.F. Risk analysis of earthquake in Sichuan province. Trop. Geog. 2009, 29(3):280-284. [in Chinese].
36. Huang C.F. Demonstration of benefit of information distribution for probability estimation. Sig. Proc. 2000, 80:1037-1048.
37. Aven T. Risk Analysis: Assessing Uncertainties Beyond Expected Values and Probabilities 2008, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England.