Growth and nitrogen use in Xanthium canadense grown in an open or in a dense stand

Physiologia Plantarum

Volumn 144, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 335-345

  Watari, Ryoji ^a   Nagashima, Hisae ^a,b   Hirose, Tadaki ^a  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NITROGEN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMASS; DARKNESS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LIGHT; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT LEAF; RADIATION EXPOSURE; XANTHIUM;

BIOMASS; DARKNESS; LIGHT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NITROGEN; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT LEAVES; XANTHIUM;

XANTHIUM; XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM CANADENSE;

EID: 84858333313     PISSN: 00319317     EISSN: 13993054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01563.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ackerly DD (1999) Self-shading, carbon gain and leaf dynamics: a test of alternative optimality models. Oecologia 119: 300-310
2. Aerts R, Chapin FS III (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30: 1-67
3. Anten NPR, Hirose T (1998) Biomass allocation and light partitioning among dominant and subordinate individuals in Xanthium canadense stands. Ann Bot 82: 665-673
4. Anten NPR, Casado-Garcia R, Nagashima H (2005) Effects of mechanical stress and plant density on mechanical characteristics, growth, and lifetime reproduction of tobacco plants. Am Nat 166: 650-660
5. 4 mono- and dicotyledonous species. Oecologia 101: 504-513
6. Anten NPR, von Wettberg EJ, Pawlowski M, Huber H (2009) Interactive effects of spectral shading and mechanical stress on the expression and costs of shade avoidance. Am Nat 173: 241-255
7. Ballaré CL (1999) Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 4: 97-102
8. Bazzaz FA, Harper JL (1977) Demographic analysis of the growth of Linum usitatissimum. New Phytol 78: 193-208
9. Berendse F, Aerts R (1987) Nitrogen-use-efficiency: a biologically meaningful definition? Funct Ecol 1: 293-296
10. Blackman GE, Wilson GL (1951) Physiological and ecological studies in the analysis of plant environment. VII. An analysis of the differential effects of light intensity on the net assimilation rate, leaf-area ratio, and relative growth rate of different species. Ann Bot 15: 373-408
11. Boonman A, Anten NPR, Dueck TA, Jordi WJRM, van der Werf A, Voesenek LACJ, Pons TL (2006) Functional significance of shade-induced leaf senescence in dense canopies: an experimental test using transgenic tobacco. Am Nat 168: 597-607
12. Chapin FS III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11: 233-260
13. Corré WJ (1983a) Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants. 1. The influence of light-intensity. Acta Bot Neerl 32: 49-62
14. Corré WJ (1983b) Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants. 2. The influence of light quality. Acta Bot Neerl 32: 185-202
15. Eckstein RL, Karlsson PS (1997) Above-ground growth and nutrient use by plants in a subarctic environment: effects of habitat, life-form and species. Oikos 79: 311-324
16. Esashi Y, Leopold AC (1968) Physical forces in dormancy and germination of Xanthium seeds. Plant Physiol 43: 360-364
17. Escudero A, Mediavilla S (2003) Decline in photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency with leaf age and nitrogen resorption as determinants of leaf life span. J Ecol 91: 880-889
18. Evans GC (1972) The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK
19. 3 plants. Oecologia 78: 9-19
20. Farquhar GD (1989) Models of integrated photosynthesis of cells and leaves. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 323: 357-367
21. Field C (1983) Allocating leaf nitrogen for the maximization of carbon gain: leaf age as a control on the allocation program. Oecologia 56: 341-347
22. Field C, Mooney HA (1986) The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 25-55
23. Franklin O, Ågren GI (2002) Leaf senescence and resorption as mechanisms of maximizing photosynthetic production during canopy development at N limitation. Funct Ecol16: 727-733
24. Garnier E, Aronson J (1998) Nitrogen-use efficiency from leaf to stand level: clarifying the concept. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 515-538
25. Garnier E, Gobin O, Poorter H (1995) Nitrogen productivity depends on photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency and on nitrogen allocation within the plant. Ann Bot 76: 667-672
26. Geber MA (1989) Interplay of morphology and development on size inequality: a Polygonum greenhouse study. Ecol Monogr 59: 267-288
27. Grime JP, Jeffrey DW (1965) Seedling establishment in vertical gradients of sunlight. J Ecol 53: 621-642
28. Henry HAL, Thomas SC (2002) Interactive effects of lateral shade and wind on stem allometry, biomass allocation, and mechanical stability in Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae). Am J Bot 89: 1609-1615
29. Hikosaka K (2004) Interspecific difference in the photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship: patterns, physiological causes, and ecological importance. J Plant Res 117: 481-494
30. Hikosaka K (2005) Leaf canopy as a dynamic system: ecophysiology and optimality in leaf turnover. Ann Bot 95: 521-533
31. Hirose T (1971) Nitrogen turnover and dry-matter production in a Solidago altissima population. Jpn J Ecol 21: 18-32
32. Hirose T (1978) Dry matter production and nitrogen uptake relationships in buckwheat plants. Jpn J Ecol 28: 25-34
33. Hirose T (1984) Nitrogen use efficiency in growth of Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. et Zucc. Ann Bot 54: 695-704
34. Hirose T (1988) Modelling the relative growth rate as a function of plant nitrogen concentration. Physiol Plant 72: 185-189
35. Hirose T (2011) Nitrogen use efficiency revisited. Oecologia 166: 863-867
36. Hirose T, Bazzaz FA (1998) Trade-off between light and nitrogen use efficiency in canopy photosynthesis. Ann Bot 82: 195-202
37. Hirose T, Werger MJA (1987a) Nitrogen use efficiency in instantaneous and daily photosynthesis of leaves in the canopy of a Solidago altissima stand. Physiol Plant 70: 215-222
38. Hirose T, Werger MJA (1987b) Maximizing daily canopy photosynthesis with respect to the leaf nitrogen allocation pattern in the canopy. Oecologia 72: 520-526
39. Hirose T, Werger MJA, Pons TL, Rheenen JWA (1988) Canopy structure and leaf nitrogen distribution in a stand of Lysimachia vulgaris L. as influenced by stand density. Oecologia 77: 145-150
40. Hirose T, Kinugasa T, Shitaka Y (2005) Time of flowering, costs of reproduction, and reproductive output in annuals. In: Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA (eds) Reproductive Allocation in Plants. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp 159-188
41. Ingestad T (1979) Nitrogen stress in birch seedlings. II. N, K, P, Ca, and Mg nutrition. Physiol Plant 45: 149-157
42. Lambers H, Poorter H (1992) Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv Ecol Res 23: 187-261
43. Monsi M, Saeki T (1953) Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellshaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Jpn J Bot 14: 22-52. English translation (2005): On the factor light in plant communities and its importance for matter production. Ann Bot 95:549-567
44. Nagashima H, Terashima I (1995) Relationships between height, diameter and weight distributions of Chenopodium album plants in stands: effects of dimension and allometry. Ann Bot 75: 181-188
45. Nishimura E, Suzaki E, Irie M, Nagashima H, Hirose T (2010) Architecture and growth of an annual plant Chenopodium album in different light climates. Ecol Res 25: 383-393
46. Oikawa S, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2008) Does leaf shedding increase the whole-plant carbon gain despite some nitrogen being lost with shedding? New Phytol 178: 617-624
47. Pons TL, de Jong-van Berkel YEM (2004) Species-specific variation in the importance of the spectral quality gradient in canopies as a signal for photosynthetic resource partitioning. Ann Bot 94: 725-732
48. Poorter H, van der Werf A (1998) Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 309-336
49. Schmid B, Bazzaz FA (1994) Crown construction, leaf dynamics, and carbon gain in two perennials with contrasting architecture. Ecol Monogr 64: 177-203
50. Shitaka Y, Hirose T (1993) Timing of seed germination and the reproductive effort in Xanthium canadense. Oecologia 95: 334-339
51. Silla F, Escudero A (2004) Nitrogen-use efficiency: trade-offs between N productivity and mean residence time at organ, plant and population levels. Funct Ecol 18: 511-521
52. Smith H (2000) Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants - an emerging synthesis. Nature 407: 585-591
53. Vitousek PM (1982) Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am Nat 119: 553-572
54. Watson DJ (1952) The physiological basis of variation in yield. Adv Agron 4: 101-145
55. Weiner J, Berntson GM, Thomas SC (1990) Competition and growth form in a woodland annual. J Ecol 78: 459-469
56. Weiner J, Thomas SC (1992) Competition and allometry in three species of annual plants. Ecology 73: 648-656
57. Williams RF (1946) The physiology of plant growth with special reference to the concept of net assimilation rate. Ann Bot 10: 41-72
58. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerley DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821-827
59. Yasumura Y, Hikosaka K, Matsui K, Hirose T (2002) Leaf-level nitrogen-use efficiency of canopy and understorey species in a beech forest. Funct Ecol 16: 826-834