Potential susceptibility of Australian native plant species to branch dieback and bole canker diseases caused by Phytophthora ramorum

Plant Pathology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 234-246

  Ireland, K B ^a,b   Huberli D ^b,c   Dell, B ^b   Smith, I W ^d   Rizzo, D M ^e   Hardy, G E S J ^a,b  

^a Australia Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity   (Australia)

^b MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Invasive organism; Oomycete; Ramorum branch dieback; Sudden oak death

Indexed keywords

DIEBACK; DISEASE INCIDENCE; DISEASE RESISTANCE; EVERGREEN FOREST; FUNGAL DISEASE; HORTICULTURE; HOST RANGE; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; PLANTATION FORESTRY; SHRUB; TOLERANCE;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

BANKSIA ATTENUATA; BILLARDIERA HETEROPHYLLA; EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS DENTICULATA; EUCALYPTUS DIVERSICOLOR; EUCALYPTUS HAEMASTOMA; EUCALYPTUS REGNANS; EUCALYPTUS VIMINALIS; ISOPOGON; OOMYCETES; PHYTOPHTHORA; PHYTOPHTHORA RAMORUM; PITTOSPORUM UNDULATUM;

EID: 84858332596     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: 13653059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02513.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Boland DJ, Brooker MIH, Chippendale GM et al., 2006. Forest Trees of Australia. Collingwood, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO.
2. Brasier C, 2003. Sudden oak death: Phytophthora ramorum exhibits transatlantic differences. Mycological Research 107, 258-9.
3. Brasier C, 2008. The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathology 57, 792-808.
4. Brasier CM, Kirk SA, 2001. Comparative aggressiveness of standard and variant hybrid alder phytophthoras, Phytophthora cambivora and other Phytophthora species on bark of Alnus, Quercus and other woody hosts. Plant Pathology 50, 218-29.
5. Brasier C, Webber J, 2010. Plant pathology: sudden larch death. Nature 466, 824-5.
6. Brasier C, Denman S, Brown A, Webber J, 2004. Sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum) discovered on trees in Europe. Mycological Research 108, 1108-10.
7. Brasier C, Rose J, Kirk S, Denman S, Webber J, 2006. Comparative host range and aggressiveness of Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae sp. nov. on North American and European trees. General Technical Report - Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 109-11.
8. Cobb RC, Meentemeyer RK, Rizzo DM, 2010. Apparent competition in canopy trees determined by pathogen transmission rather than susceptibility. Ecology 91, 327-33.
9. Dart NL, Chastagner GA, 2007. Estimated economic losses associated with the destruction of plants due to Phytophthora ramorum quarantine efforts in Washington State. Plant Health Progress doi:
10. Davidson JM, Werres S, Garbelotto M, Hansen EM, Rizzo DM, 2003. Sudden oak death and associated diseases caused by Phytophthora ramorum. Plant Health Progress doi:
11. Davidson JM, Wickland AC, Patterson HA, Falk KR, Rizzo DM, 2005. Transmission of Phytophthora ramorum in mixed-evergreen forest in California. Phytopathology 95, 587-96.
12. De Dobbelaere I, Vercauteren A, Speybroeck N et al., 2010. Effect of host factors on the susceptibility of Rhododendron to Phytophthora ramorum. Plant Pathology 59, 301-12.
13. Denman S, Kirk SA, Brasier CM, Webber JF, 2005. In vitro leaf inoculation studies as an indication of tree foliage susceptibility to Phytophthora ramorum in the UK. Plant Pathology 54, 512-21.
14. Denman S, Orton E, Kirk SA, Brasier C, 2006. Sporulation potential of Phytophthora ramorum on detached leaves of some susceptible UK trees in vitro. Brasier C, Jung T, Osswald W, eds. Progress in Research on Phytophthora Diseases of Forest Trees. Proceedings of the Third International IUFRO Working Party S07.02.09 Meeting at Freising, Germany, 11-18 September 2004 Farnham, UK: Forest Research, 75-8.
15. Dodd RS, Hüberli D, Douhovnikoff V, Harnik TY, Afzal-Rafii Z, Garbelotto M, 2005. Is variation in susceptibility to Phytophthora ramorum correlated with population genetic structure in coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia)? New Phytologist 165, 203-14.
16. Dodd RS, Hüberli D, Mayer W, Harnik TY, Afzal-Rafii Z, Garbelotto M, 2008. Evidence for the role of synchronicity between host phenology and pathogen activity in the distribution of sudden oak death canker disease. New Phytologist 179, 505-14.
17. Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK, 1996. Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide. St Paul, MN, USA: APS Press.
18. Forestry Commission, 2011. Phytophthora ramorum in Larch Trees - Update. Farnham, UK: Forestry Commission. [].
19. Goheen EM, Hansen EM, Kanaskie A, McWilliams MG, Osterbauer N, Sutton W, 2002. Sudden oak death caused by Phytophthora ramorum in Oregon. Plant Disease 86, 441.
20. Goss EM, Larsen M, Chastagner GA, Givens DR, Grünwald NJ, 2009. Population genetic analysis infers migration pathways of Phytophthora ramorum in US Nurseries. PLoS Pathogens 5, e1000583. doi:
21. Grünwald NJ, Goss EM, Ivors K et al., 2009. Standardizing the nomenclature for clonal lineages of the sudden oak death pathogen, Phytophthora ramorum. Phytopathology 99, 792-5.
22. Hansen EM, Parke JL, Sutton W, 2005. Susceptibility of Oregon forest trees and shrubs to Phytophthora ramorum: a comparison of artificial inoculation and natural infection. Plant Disease 89, 63-70.
23. Hardham AR, 2005. Phytophthora cinnamomi. Molecular Plant Pathology 6, 589-604.
24. Harris JA, Kassaby FY, Smith IW, Marks GC, 1983. Intra-specific variation in resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in Eucalyptus regnans. Australasian Plant Pathology 12, 20-2.
25. Hüberli D, Garbelotto M, 2011. Phytophthora ramorum is a generalist plant pathogen with differences in virulence between isolates from infectious and dead-end hosts. Forest Pathology doi:
26. Hüberli D, Lutzy B, Voss B, Calver M, Ormsby M, Garbelotto M, 2008. Susceptibility of New Zealand flora to Phytophthora ramorum and pathogen sporulation potential: an approach based on the precautionary principle. Australasian Plant Pathology 37, 615-25.
27. Ireland KB, Hüberli D, Dell B, Smith IW, Rizzo D, Hardy GESJ, 2011. Potential susceptibility of Australian flora to Phytophthora ramorum and pathogen sporulation potential. Forest Pathology in press.
28. Ivors K, Garbelotto M, Vries IDE et al., 2006. Microsatellite markers identify three lineages of Phytophthora ramorum in US nurseries, yet single lineages in US forest and European nursery populations. Molecular Ecology 15, 1493-505.
29. Jeffers SN, Martin SB, 1986. Comparison of two media selective for Phytophthora and Pythium species. Plant Disease 70, 1038-43.
30. Kaminski K, Wagner S, 2008. In vitro inoculation studies for estimating the susceptibility of ornamental plants to Phytophthora ramorum. Journal of Phytopathology 156, 480-6.
31. Kliejunas JT, 2010. Sudden Oak Death and Phytophthora ramorum: A Summary of the Literature. Albany, CA, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-234.
32. McDonald VT, Grünwald N, 2007. Evaluation of infection potential and sporulation of the three clonal lineages of Phytophthora ramorum on two Rhododendron cultivars. Phytopathology 97, S73.
33. Mascheretti S, Croucher PJP, Vettraino A, Prospero S, Garbelotto M, 2008. Reconstruction of the sudden oak death epidemic in California through microsatellite analysis of the pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. Molecular Ecology 17, 2755-68.
34. Metz M, Frangioso K, Meentemeyer R, Rizzo D, 2011. Interacting disturbances: wildfire severity affected by stage of forest disease invasion. Ecological Applications 21, 313-20.
35. Monahan WB, Koenig WD, 2006. Estimating the potential effects of sudden oak death on oak-dependent birds. Biological Conservation 127, 146-57.
36. Moralejo E, Garcia Munoz JA, Descals E, 2009. Susceptibility of Iberian trees to Phytophthora ramorum and P. cinnamomi. Plant Pathology 58, 271-83.
37. Plant Health Australia, 2006. National Nursery and Garden Industry Biosecurity Plan. Deakin, Australia: Plant Health Australia.
38. RAPRA, 2007. Risk Analysis for Phytophthora ramorum. Geographical Distribution of Naturally Infected Hosts. Database of First Natural Host Record For Each Country. [].
39. Rizzo DM, Garbelotto M, Hansen EA, 2005. Phytophthora ramorum: integrative research and management of an emerging pathogen in California and Oregon forests. Annual Review of Phytopathology 43, 309-35.
40. Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, 1985. A computerised system for matching climates in ecology. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 13, 281-99.
41. USDA-APHIS, 2010. APHIS List of Regulated Hosts and Plants Proven or Associated with Phytophthora ramorum. United States Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [Available at: ] Verified 9th April 2011.
42. Venette RC, Cohen SD, 2006. Potential climatic suitability for establishment of Phytophthora ramorum within the contiguous United States. Forest Ecology and Management 231, 18-26.
43. Weste G, Marks GC, 1987. The biology of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Australasian forests. Annual Review of Phytopathology 25, 207-29.