Analysis of the effects of physical task stress on the speech signal

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 130, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 3992-3998

  Godin, Keith W ^a   Hansen, John H L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A-LAPLACIAN; ACOUSTIC FEATURES; F-RATIO; FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCIES; GAUSSIAN MIXTURE MODELS; KULLBACK LEIBLER DIVERGENCE; LOG LIKELIHOOD RATIO; MEL-FREQUENCY CEPSTRAL COEFFICIENTS; SECOND LEVEL; SPEECH SIGNALS;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

TELEPHONE SETS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858320474     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3647301     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Boril, H., and Hansen, J. H. L. (2010). Unsupervised equalization of Lombard effect for speech recognition in noisy adverse environments, IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process. 18, 1379-1393. 10.1109/TASL.2009.2034770
2. Bou-Ghazale, S. E., and Hansen, J. H. L. (2000). A comparative study of traditional and newly proposed features for recognition of speech under stress, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 8, 429-442. 10.1109/89.848224
3. Cairns, D. A., and Hansen, J. H. L. (1994). Nonlinear analysis and classification of speech under stressed conditions, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 3392-3400. 10.1121/1.410601
4. Campbell, J. P. (1997). Speaker recognition: A tutorial, Proc. IEEE 85, 1437-1462. 10.1109/5.628714
5. Davis, J. A., and Convertino, V. A. (1975). A comparison of heart rate methods for predicting endurance training intensity, Med. Sci. Sports 7, 295-298.
6. Davis, S. P., and Mermelstein, P. (1980). Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. 28, 357-366. 10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163420
7. Entwistle, M. S. (2003). The performance of automated speech recognition systems under adverse conditions of human exertion, Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 16, 127-140. 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1602-01
8. Entwistle, M. S. (2005). Training methods and enrollment techniques to improve the performance of automated speech recognition systems under conditions of human exertion, Ph.D. thesis, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD.
9. Godin, K. W. (2009). Classification based analysis of speech under physical task stress, Master's thesis, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.
10. Godin, K. W., and Hansen, J. H. L. (2008). Analysis and perception of speech under physical task stress, in INTERSPEECH 2008, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 1674-1677.
11. Hansen, J. H. L. (1988). Analysis and compensation of stressed and noisy speech with application to robust automatic recognition, Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
12. Ikeno, A., Varadarajan, V., Patil, S., and Hansen, J. H. L. (2007). UT-Scope: Speech under Lombard effect and cognitive stress, in IEEE Aerospace Conference 2007, Big Sky, MT, pp. 1-7.
13. Johannes, B., Wittels, P., Enne, R., Eisinger, G., Castro, C. A., Thomas, J. L., Adler, A. B., and Gerzer, R. (2007). Non-linear function model of voice pitch dependency on physical and mental load, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 101, 267-276. 10.1007/s00421-007-0496-6
14. Lindstrom, A., Villing, J., Larsson, S., Seward, A., Aberg, N., and Holtelius, C. (2008). The effect of cognitive load on disfluencies during in-vehicle spoken dialogue, in INTERSPEECH 2008, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 1196-1199.
15. Lu, X., and Dang, J. (2008). An investigation of dependencies between frequency components and speaker characteristics for text-independent speaker identification, Speech Commun. 50, 312-322. 10.1016/j.specom.2007.10.005
16. Meckel, Y., Rotstein, A., and Inbar, O. (2002). The effects of speech production on physologic responses during submaximal exercise, Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 34, 1337-1343. 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00016
17. Morrow, C. T. (1971). Speech in deep-submergence atmospheres, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 50, 715-728. 10.1121/1.1912690
18. Murray, I. R., Baber, C., and South, A. (1996). Towards a definition and working model of stress and its effects on speech, Speech Commun. 20, 3-12. 10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00040-4
19. Olson, L. G., and Strohl, K. P. (1987). The response of the nasal airway to exercise, Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 135, 356-359.
20. Patil, S. A., and Hansen, J. H. L. (2010). The physiological microphone (PMIC): A competitive alternative for speaker assessment in stress detection and speaker verification, Speech Commun. 52, 327-340. 10.1016/j.specom.2009.11.006
21. Reynolds, D. A., and Rose, R. C. (1995). Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 3, 72-83. 10.1109/89.365379
22. Rotstein, A., Meckel, Y., and Inbar, O. (2004). Perceived speech difficulty during exercise and its relation to exercise intensity and physiological responses, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 92, 431-436. 10.1007/s00421-004-1160-z
23. Tanaka, H., Monahan, K. D., and Seals, D. R. (2001). Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 37, 153-156. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01054-8
24. Vogel, A. P., Fletcher, J., and Maruff, P. (2010). Acoustic analysis of the effects of sustained wakefuleness on speech, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 3747-3756. 10.1121/1.3506349
25. Womack, B. D., and Hansen, J. H. L. (1996). Improved speech recognition via speaker stress directed classification, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Atlanta, GA, pp. 53-57.
26. Young, S., Evermann, G., Gales, M., Hain, T., Kershaw, D., Liu, X., Moore, G., Odell, J., Ollason, D., Povey, D., Valtchev, V., and Woodland, P. (2006). The HTK book (for HTK version 3.4), pp. 300-302, http://htk.eng.cam.ac. uk (Last viewed: June 5, 2010).