Goal-oriented requirements engineering and enterprise architecture: Two case studies and some lessons learned

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7195 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 306-320

  Engelsman, Wilco ^a,b   Wieringa, Roel ^b  

^a BiZZdesign ^*  (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIDIRECTIONAL TRACE ABILITIES; BUSINESS GOALS; CORE SET; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; GOAL-ORIENTED; GOAL-ORIENTED REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

ARMOR; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; RESEARCH;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84858316737     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28714-5_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J.: Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 8(3), 203-236 (2004)
2. Business Motivation Model: Business motivation model version 1.0. Standard document (2007), http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.0/PDF (22.09. 2009)
3. Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X.: On the use of i* for architecting hybrid systems: A method and an evaluation report. In: The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, pp. 38-53 (2009)
4. Clements, P., Bass, L.: Using Business Goals to Inform a Software Architecture. In: 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 69-78. IEEE Computer Society Press (2010)
5. Engelsman, W., Quartel, D.A.C., Jonkers, H., van Sinderen, M.J.: Extending enterprise architecture modelling with business goals and requirements. Enterprise Information Systems 5(1), 9-36 (2011)
6. Forrester, J.: If p, then what? thinking in cases. History of the Human Sciences 9(3) (1996)
7. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information system research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75-105 (2004)
8. Horkoff, J., Yu, E.: Evaluating Goal Achievement in Enterprise Modeling - An Interactive Procedure and Experiences. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 39, pp. 145-160. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
9. Jureta, I., Faulkner, S.: An Agent-Oriented Meta-model for Enterprise Modelling. In: Akoka, J., Liddle, S.W., Song, I.-Y., Bertolotto, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., van den Heuvel,W.-J., Kolp, M., Trujillo, J., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) ER Workshops 2005. LNCS, vol. 3770, pp. 151-161. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
10. Lamsweerde, A.: Kaos tutorial. Cediti, September 5 (2003)
11. Matulevičius, R., Heymans, P.: Comparing Goal Modelling Languages: An Experiment. In: Sawyer, P., Heymans, P. (eds.) REFSQ 2007. LNCS, vol. 4542, pp. 18-32. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
12. Matulevičius, R., Heymans, P., Opdahl, A.: Comparing grl and kaos using the ueml approach. In: Enterprise Interoperability II, pp. 77-88 (2007)
13. Moody, D.: The physics of notations: Improving the usability and communicability of visual notations in requirements engineering. In: 2009 Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Visualization (REV), pp. 56-57 (September 2009)
14. Moody, D., Heymans, P., Matulevicius, R.: Improving the Effectiveness of Visual Representations in Requirements Engineering: An Evaluation of i* Visual Syntax. In: 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2009, pp. 171-180. IEEE Computer Society Press (2009)
15. Quartel, D.A.C., Engelsman, W., Jonkers, H., van Sinderen, M.J.: A goal-oriented requirements modelling language for enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference, EDOC 2009, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 3-13. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2009)
16. Stirna, J.,Persson, A., Sandkuhl,K.: ParticipativeEnterpriseModeling: Experiences and Recommendations. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 546-560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
17. Sunstein, C.R.: On analogical reasoning. Harvard Law Review 106, 741-790 (1993)
18. The Open Group: ArchiMate 1.0 Specification. Van Haren Publishing (2009)
19. The Open Group: TOGAF Version 9. Van Haren Publishing (2009)
20. Wieringa, R.J.: Design science as nested problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Philadelphia, pp. 1-12. ACM, New York (2009)
21. Yu, E.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 226-235. IEEE Computer Society Press (2002)