Organisering og nytteverdi av obduksjon

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 132, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 152-154

  Hagestuen, Per Ove ^a,c   Aase, Steinar ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c Fylkesmannen i Telemark ^*  (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL STAFF; NORWAY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; AUTOPSY; HOSPITALISTS; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; NORWAY; PATHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84858306776     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: 08077096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.10.1393     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hagestuen PO. Praktiske vilkår for obduksjonsvirksomheten ved norske sykehus. Hovedoppgave. Bergen: Det medisinsk-odontologiske fakultet, Universitetet i Bergen, 2009.
2. The Norwegian Society of Pathology. 75 års jubileum 1923 - 1998. Oslo: Den norske patologforening, 1998.
3. Midelfart J, Aase S. The value of autopsy from a clinical point of view. A survey of 250 general practitioners and hospital clinicians in the county of Sør-Trøndelag, Norway. APMIS 1998; 106: 693 - 8.
4. Produksjonstall fra Den norske patologforening i 2009, i forbindelse med foreningens årsrapport. http://legeforeningen.no/asset/46547/1/ 46547_1.pdf (7.5.2011).
5. Forskrift om obduksjon m.m. FOR 2004-03-19-542. Oslo: Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet, 2004.
6. Hooper JE, Geller SA. Relevance of the autopsy as a medical tool: a large database of physician attitudes. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131: 268 - 74.
7. Hull MJ, Nazarian RM, Wheeler AE et al. Resident physician opinions on autopsy importance and procurement. Hum Pathol 2007; 38: 342 - 50.
8. Nemetz PN, Tanglos E, Sands LP et al. Attitudes toward the autopsy - an 8-state survey. MedGen-Med 2006; 8: 80.
9. Burton JL, Underwood J. Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet 2007; 369: 1471 - 80.
10. Ayoub T, Chow J. The conventional autopsy in modern medicine. J R Soc Med 2008; 101: 177 - 81.
11. Ravakhah K. Death certificates are not reliable: revivification of the autopsy. South Med J 2006; 99: 728 - 33.
12. Alfsen GC, Lyckander LG, Lindboe AW et al. Kvalitetssikring ved dødsfall i sykehus. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2010; 130: 476 - 9.
13. Heriot GS, Pitman AG, Gonzales M et al. The four horsemen: clinicopathological correlation in 407 hospital autopsies. Intern Med J 2010; 40: 626 - 32.
14. Chariot P, Witt K, Pautot V et al. Declining autopsy rate in a French hospital: physician's attitudes to the autopsy and use of autopsy material in research publications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124: 739 - 45.
15. Tsitsikas DA, Brothwell M, Chin Aleong J-A et al. The attitudes of relatives to autopsy: a misconception. J Clin Pathol 2011; 64: 412 - 4.
16. Eide TJ, Laane BFM, Mortensen E et al. Patologifaget i det norske helsevesen. Statens helsetilsyns utredningsserie nr. 2 - 99, IK-2682. Oslo: Statens helsetilsyn, 1999.
17. Berget E, Ramnefjell M, Svendsen EB et al. Færre sykehusobduksjoner - lang svartid. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2007; 127: 2800 - 2.