Patient Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Arthroplasty Surgery in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Bozic, Kevin J ^a,b   Chiu, Vanessa ^a,b   Slover, James D ^c   Immerman, Igor ^c   Kahn, James G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic analysis; Hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Patient preferences; Total hip arthroplasty; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 84858294207     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fronstin P. What do we really know about consumer-driven health plans?. EBRI Issue Brief 2010, 1.
2. Munn J. Looking beyond health reform: the future of consumer-focused health care. Benefits Q 2010, 26:43.
3. Byrne M.M., O'Malley K., Suarez-Almazor M.E. Willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year in a study of knee osteoarthritis. Med Decis Making 2005, 25:655.
4. Nocera S., Bonato D., Telser H. The contingency of contingent valuation. How much are people willing to pay against Alzheimer's disease?. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2002, 2:219.
5. Gafni A. Willingness to pay in the context of an economic evaluation of healthcare programs: theory and practice. Am J Manag Care 1997, (3 Suppl):S21.
6. Robinson R. Economic evaluation and health care. What does it mean?. BMJ 1993, 307(6905):670.
7. Ethgen O., Bruyere O., Richy F., et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:963.
8. Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S., Cabanela M.E., et al. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A:171.
9. Soderman P., Malchau H., Herberts P., et al. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72:113.
10. AAOS Now The hip resurfacing/hip replacement debate. AAOS Now 2008.
11. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. A technology overview 2009, Rosement, Illinois. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (Ed.).
12. Bozic K.J., Smith A.R., Hariri S., et al. The 2007 ABJS Marshall Urist Award: the impact of direct-to-consumer advertising in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 458:202.
13. CalPERS CalPERS Adopts 2011 Health Premium Rates [cited 2011 March 14]; Available from, Accessed March 14 2011. http://www.calpers.ca.gov/index.jsp?bc=/about/press/pr-archive/pr-2010/june/2011-health-premium-rates.xml.
14. Cross M.J., March L.M., Lapsley H.M., et al. Determinants of willingness to pay for hip and knee joint replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000, 39:1242.
15. Bozic K.J., Pui C.M., Ludeman M.J., et al. Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:2301.