Is Hydroxyapatite Coating Necessary to Improve Survivorship of Porous-Coated Titanium Femoral Stem?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 559-563

  Kim, Young Hoo ^a   Kim, Jun Shik ^a   Joo, Jong Hwan ^a   Park, Jang Won ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Hydroxyapatite coating; Survivorship; Titanium femoral stem

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GEOMETRY; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVOR;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POROSITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84858284586     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bauer T.W., Geesink R.C., Zimmerman R., et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histological analysis of components retrieved at autopsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991, 73:1439.
2. Kroon P.O., Freeman M.A. Hydroxyapatite coating of hip prostheses. Effect on migration into the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992, 74:518.
3. Søballe K., Toksvig-Larsen S., Gelineck J., et al. Migration of hydroxyapatite coated femoral prostheses. A Roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993, 75:681.
4. Manley M.T., Capello W.N., et al. Fixation of acetabular cups without cement in total hip arthroplasty. A comparison of three different implant surfaces at a minimum duration of follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:1175.
5. McPherson E.J., Dorr L.D., Gruen T.A., et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated proximal ingrowth femoral stems. A matched pair control study. Clin Orthop 1995, 315:223.
6. Bloebaum R., Rubman M., Bachus K., et al. Comparison of hydroxyapatite coated and porous coated femoral hip implants retrieved from the same patient. Trans Soc Biomater 1991, 14:14.
7. Dorr L.D., Wan Z., Song M., et al. Bilateral total hip arthroplasty comparing hydroxyapatite coating to porous-coated fixation. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:729.
8. Kim Y.-H., Kim J.-S., Oh S.-H., et al. Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85:1682.
9. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969, 51:737.
10. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheum 1988, 1:95.
11. Zahiri C.A., Schmalzried T.P., Szuszczewicz E.S., et al. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:890.
12. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159.
13. Dorr L.D. Total hip replacement using APR system. Tech Orthop 1986, 1:22.
14. Engh C.A., Culpepper W.J., Engh C.A. Long-term results of use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997, 79:177.
15. Kim Y.-H., Kim J.-S., Cho S.-H. A comparison of polyethylene wear in hips with cobalt-chrome or zirconia heads. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83:742.
16. DeLee J.G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976, 121:20.
17. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., Amstutz H.C. "Modes of failures" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979, 141:17.
18. Kaplan E.L., Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assn 1958, 53:457.
19. Geesink R.G., de Groot K., Klein C.P. Bonding of bone to apatite-coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988, 70:17.
20. Aebli N., Krebs J., Schwenke D., et al. Degradation of hydroxyapatite coating on a well-functioning femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:499.
21. Rothman R.H., Hozack W.J., Ranawat A., et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. A matched-pair analysis of coated and uncoated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996, 78:319.
22. Yee A.J., Kreder H.K., Bookman I., et al. A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999, 366:120.
23. Dalton J.E., Cook S.D., Thomas K.A., et al. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995, 77:97.
24. Mulliken B.D., Bourne R.B., Rorabeck C.H., et al. A tapered titanium femoral stem inserted without cement in a total hip arthroplasty. Radiographic evaluation and stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996, 78:1214.
25. Sakalkale D.P., Eng K., Hozack W.J., et al. Minimum 10-year results of a tapered cementless hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1999, 362:138.
26. Mallory T.H., Head W.C., Lombardi A.V. Tapered design for the cementless total hip arthroplasty femoral component. Clin Orthop 1997, 344:172.
27. Morscher E.W., Hefti A., Aebi U. Severe osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coating. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:267.
28. Charnley J., Cupic Z. The nine and ten year results of the low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 1973, 95:9.
29. Wroblewski B.M. Charnley low friction arthroplasty in patients under the age of 40 years. The young patient with degenerative hip disease 1985, 197. Stockholm, Almqvist and Wiksell. J. Sevastik, I. Goldie (Eds.).
30. Schmalzried T.P., Jasty M., Harris W.H. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992, 74:849.