A reference-based scoring model for increasing the findability of promising ideas in innovation pipelines

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1183-1186

  Xu, Anbang ^a   Bailey, Brian ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

idea pipeline; innovation; reference based scoring

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; OPEN INNOVATION; REFERENCE-BASED SCORING; SCORING MODELS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INNOVATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

PIPELINES;

EID: 84858266322     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2145204.2145380     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bailey, B.P. and Horvitz, E., What's Your Idea? A Case Study of a Grassroots. Innovation Pipeline within a Large Software Company. In CHI, (2010), 2065-2074.
2. Chesbrough, H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
3. Cooper, R.G. and Brentan, U.d. Criteria for Screening New Industrial Products. Industrial Marketing Management, 13, 3, (1984), 149-156.
4. Cosley, D., Lam, S.K., Albert, I., Konstan, J.A., & Riedl, J., Is Seeing Believing? How Recommender Interfaces Affect Users' Opinions. In CHI, (2003), 585-592.
5. Eagly, A.H. and Chaiken, S. Attitude Structure and Function. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S.T.& Lindzey, G. eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, New York, 269-322.
6. Fischhoff, B. Value Elicitation: Is There Anything in There? American Psychologist, 46, 8, (1991), 835-847.
7. Hacker, S. and Ahn, L.v., Matchin: Eliciting User Preferences with an Online Game. In CHI, (2009), 1207-1216.
8. Holtzblatt, L. and Tierney, M, Measuring the Effectiveness of Social Media on an Innovation Process. CHI, 2011, 697-712.
9. Hsee, C.K. The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 3, (1996), 247-257.
10. Hullman, J., Adar, E., & Shah, P., The Impact of Social Information on Visual Judgments. In CHI, (2011), 1461-1470.
11. Kostakos, V., Is the Crowd's Wisdom Biased? A Quantitative Analysis of Three Online Communities. In Intl Conf on Computational Science and Engineering, (2009), 251-255.
12. Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, NY, 1963.
13. Otterbacher, J., Helpfulness' in online communities: a measure of message quality. In CHI, (2009), 955-964.
14. Phillips, K.A., Johnson, F.R., & Maddala, T. Measuring What People Value: A Comparison of "Attitude" and "Preference"Surveys. Health Services Research, 36, 7, (2002), 1659-1679.
15. Riedl, C., S, W., JM, L., & H., K., Exploring Large Collections of Ideas in Collaborative Settings through Visualization. In Proceedings of 20th Annual Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, (2010).
16. Salganik, M.J. and Watts, D.J. Web-Based Experiments for the Study of Collective Social Dynamics in Cultural Markets. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, (2009), 439-468.
17. Sarma, A.D., Sarma, A.D., Gollapudi, S., & Panigrahy., R., Ranking Mechanisms in Twitter-like Forums. In Proc. ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, (2010), 21-30.
18. Slovic, P. The Construction of Preference. American Psychologist, 50, 5, (1995), 364-371.