Peer review under the spotlight in the UK

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 718-720

  Watson, Roger ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH;

EID: 84858213188     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: 13652648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05932.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Council of Science Editors (2006) CSE's White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publishing. CSE, Reston, VA.
2. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2011a) Peer Review in Scientific Publications. The Stationery Office Ltd, London.
3. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2011b) The Reviews into the University of East Anglia's Climactic Research Unit's E-mails. The Stationery Office Ltd, London.
4. The British Academy (2007) Peer Review: The Challenges for the Humanities and Sciences. The British Academy, London.
5. Thomson Reuters (2011) Increasing the Quality and Timeliness of Scholarly Peer Review. Thomson Reuters, New York, NY.
6. Ware (2008) Peer Review: Benefits, Perceptions and Alternatives. Publishing Research Consortium, London.
7. Ware & Monkman (2008) Peer Review in Scholarly journals: Perspectives of the Scholarly Community - An International Study. Publishing Research Consortium, London.