The Mundlak Approach in the Spatial Durbin Panel Data Model;L'approche de Mundlak pour le modèle de données spatiales de Durbin

Spatial Economic Analysis

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 109-131

  Debarsy, Nicolas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

Author keywords

house price model; Mundlak approach; panel data model; random effects; spatial autocorrelation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858212932     PISSN: 17421772     EISSN: 17421780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2011.647059     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Method and Models, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
2. Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P. and Pfaffermayr, M. 2009a. A Generalized Spatial Panel Data Model with Random Effects, Working Paper.
3. Baltagi, B. H., Song, S. H., Jung, B. C. and Koh, W. 2007. Testing for serial correlation, spatial autocorrelation and random effects using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 140: 5-51.
4. Baltagi, B. H., Song, S. H. and Koh, W. 2003. Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation. Journal of Econometrics, 117: 123-150.
5. Baltagi, B. H., Song, S. H. and Kwon, J. H. 2009b. Testing for heteroskedasticity and spatial correlation in a random effects panel data model. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 53: 2897-2922.
6. Beron, K., Hanson, Y., Murdooch, J. and Thayer, M. 2004. "Hedonic price functions and spatial dependence: implications for the demand for urban air quality". In Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications, Edited by: Anselin, L., Florax, R.J.G.M. and Rey, S. 267-316. Berlin: Springer.
7. Can, A. 1990. The measurement of neighborhood dynamics in urban house prices. Economic Geography, 66: 254-272.
8. Can, A. 1992. Specification and estimation of hedonic house price models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22: 453-474.
9. Can, A. and Megbolugbe, I. 1997. Spatial dependence and house price index construction. The Journal of Real Estate and Finance, 14: 203-222.
10. Debarsy, N. and Ertur, C. 2010. Testing for spatial autocorrelation in a fixed effects panel data model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40: 453-470.
11. Denil, F., Mignolet, M. and Mulquin, M.-E. 2004. Interregional Differences in Taxes and Population Mobility, Working Paper, University of Namur.
12. Dubin, R., Pace, K. R. and Thibodeau, T. 1999. Spatial autoregression techniques for real estate data. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 7: 79-95.
13. Elhorst, P. J. 2003. Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Science Review, 26: 244-268.
14. Elhorst, P. J. 2010. "Spatial panel data models". In Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis, Edited by: Fischer, M.M. and Getis, A. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
15. Ertur, C. and Koch, W. 2007. Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: theory and evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22: 1033-1062.
16. Ertur, C. & Koch, W. (2008) A Contribution to the Shumpeterian Growth Theory and Empirics, Working paper, LEO 2008-25.
17. Fingleton, B. 2008. Housing supply, housing demand, and affordability. Urban Studies, 45: 1545-1563.
18. Fingleton, B. 2010. Predicting the Geography of House Price, London: London School of Economics.
19. Hausman, J.A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46: 1251-1271.
20. Hausman, J.A. and Taylor, W.E. 1981. Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica, 49: 1377-1398.
21. Kapoor, M., Kelejian, H. H. and Prucha, I. R. 2007. Panel data models with spatially correlated error components. Journal of Econometrics, 140: 97-130.
22. Kelejian, H. H. and Prucha, I. R. 2010. Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. Journal of Econometrics, 157: 53-67.
23. Lee, L.-F. and Yu, J. 2010a. Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 154: 165-185.
24. Lee, L.-F. and Yu, J. 2010b. Some recent developments in spatial panel data models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40: 255-271.
25. Lee, L.-F. and Yu, J. 2010c. A spatial dynamic panel data model with both time and individual fixed effects. Econometric Theory, 26: 564-597.
26. Lee, L.-F. and Yu, J. 2010d. Spatial Panels: Random Components vs. Fixed Effects, Working Paper.
27. Lesage, J. 1997. Bayesian estimation of spatial autoregressive models. International Regional Science Review, 20: 113-129.
28. LeSage, J. and Pace, K. R. 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
29. Mundlak, Y. 1978. On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46: 69-85.
30. Mutl, J. and Pfaffermayr, M. 2010. The Hausman test in a Cliff and Ord panel model. Econometrics Journal, 10: 1-30.
31. Osland, L. 2010. An application of spatial econometrics in relation to hedonic house price modeling. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 32: 289-320.
32. Pfaffermayr, M. 2009. Conditional beta and sigma convergence in space: a maximum likelihood approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39: 63-78.
33. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82: 34-55.
34. Tse, R. Y. C. 2002. Estimating neighborhood effects in house prices: towards a new hedonic model approach. Urban Studies, 39: 1165-1180.