Estimation of functional connectivity from electromagnetic signals and the amount of empirical data required

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 513, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 57-61

  Nevado, Angel ^a,b,c   Hadjipapas, Avgis ^d,h   Kinsey, Kristofer ^e   Moratti, Stephan ^a,c   Barnes, Gareth R ^f   Holliday, Ian E ^g   Green, Gary G ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MADRID   (Spain)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^h ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cross correlation; Functional connectivity; Magnetoencephalography; Neuroimaging; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROTRANSMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84858151226     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barnes G.R., Hillebrand A. Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2003, 18:112-120.
2. Brookes M.J., Woolrich M., Luckhoo H., Price D., Hale J.R., Stephenson M.C., Barnes G.R., Smith S.M., Morris P.G. Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting-state networks using magnetoencephalography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:16783-16788.
3. Clifford P., Richardson S., Hemon D. Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 1989, 45:123-134.
4. David O., Cosmelli D., Friston K.J. Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model. Neuroimage 2004, 21:659-673.
5. Dutilleul P. Modifying the t-test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 1993, 49:305-314.
6. Eggermont J.J., Smith G.M. Neural connectivity only accounts for a small part of neural correlation in auditory cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 1996, 110:379-391.
7. Friston K.J. Functional and effective connectivity: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1994, 2:56-78.
8. Huang M.X., Shih J.J., Lee R.R., Harrington D.L., Thomas R.J., Weisend M.P., Hanlon F., Paulson K.M., Li T., Martin K., Millers G.A., Canive J.M. Commonalities, differences among vectorized beamformers in electromagnetic source imaging. Brain Topogr. 2004, 16:139-158.
9. Moratti S., Saugar C., Strange B.A. Prefrontal-occipitoparietal coupling underlies late latency human neuronal responses to emotion. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31.
10. Nichols T.E., Holme A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 15:1-25.
11. Oostenveld R., Fries P., Maris E., Schoffelen J.M., Fieldtrip Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011.
12. Pereda E., Quiroga R.Q., Bhattacharya J. Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Prog. Neurobiol. 2005, 77:1-37.
13. Prichard D., Theiler J. Generating surrogate data for timeseries with several simultaneously measured variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 73:951-954.
14. van Veen B.D., van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1997, 44:867-880.
15. Vrba J., Robinson S.E. Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. Methods 2001, 2:249-271.