Generating textual summaries of bar charts

INLG 2008 - 5th International Natural Language Generation Conference, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 7-15

  Demir, Seniz ^a   Carberry, Sandra ^a   McCoy, Kathleen F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; GRAPH THEORY;

BAR CHART; BOTTOM UP APPROACH; EVALUATION STUDY; INFORMATION GRAPHICS; LINE GRAPH; MULTI-MODAL; NATURAL LANGUAGES; SENTENCE STRUCTURES;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84858148246     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1708322.1708327     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Sandra Carberry, Stephanie Elzer, and Seniz Demir. 2006. Information graphics: an untapped resource for digital libraries. In Proc. of SIGIR'2006.
2. Michael A. Covington, Congzhou He, Cati Brown, Lorina Naci, and John Brown 2006. How complex is that sentence? A proposed revision of the Rosenberg and Abbeduto D-Level scale. Research Report, AI Center, University of Georgia.
3. Seniz Demir, Sandra Carberry, and Stephanie Elzer. 2007. Effectively realizing the inferred message of an information graphic. In Proc. of RANLP'2007.
4. Michael Elhadad and Jacques Robin. 1996. An overview of SURGE: a re-usable comprehensive syntactic realization component. In Proc. of INLG'1996.
5. Stephanie Elzer, Edward Schwartz, Sandra Carberry, Daniel Chester, Seniz Demir, and Peng Wu. 2007. A browser extension for providing visually impaired users access to the content of bar charts on the web. In Proc. of WEBIST'2007.
6. Leo Ferres, Petro Verkhogliad, Gitte Lindgaard, Louis Boucher, Antoine Chretien, and Martin Lachance. 2007. Improving accessibility to statistical graphs: the iGraph-Lite system. In Proc. of ASSETS'2007.
7. Robert Futrelle. 1999. Summarization of diagrams in documents. In Advances in Automated Text Summarization. MIT Press, pp. 403-421.
8. Paul Grice. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Speech Acts, 3:41-58.
9. Barbara Grosz and Candace Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. In Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175-204.
10. Aravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber, and Ralph Weischedel. 1984. Living up to expectations: computing expert responses. In Proc. of NCAI'1984.
11. Evan Kidd and Edith Bavin. 2002. English-speaking childrens comprehension of relative clauses: evidence for general-cognitive and language-specific constraints on development. In Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(6):599-617. (Pubitemid 41462068)
12. Daniel Marcu. 1997. The rhetorical parsing, summarization, and generation of natural language texts. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.
13. Kathleen F. McCoy, Sandra Carberry, Tom Roper, and Nancy Green. 2001. Towards generating textual summaries of graphs. In Proc. of HCI'2001.
14. Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale. 1997. Building applied natural language generation systems. In Natural Language Engineering, 3(1):57-87.
15. Brian Roark, Margaret Mitchell, and Kristy Hollingshead. 2007. Syntactic complexity measures for detecting mild cognitive impairment. In Proc. Of BioNLP'2007.
16. Marilyn Walker, Owen Rambow, and Monica Rogati. 2002. Training a sentence planner for spoken dialogue using boosting. In Computer Speech and Language: Special Issue on Spoken Language Generation, 16(3-4):409-433.
17. Jin Yu, Ehud Reiter, Jim Hunter, and Chris Mellish. 2007. Choosing the content of textual summaries of large time-series data sets. In Natural Language Engineering,13(1):25-49. (Pubitemid 46322713)