Individuality and alignment in generated dialogues

COLING/ACL 2006: INLG-06 - 4th International Natural Language Generation Conference, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 25-32

  Isard, Amy ^a   Brockmann, Carsten ^a   Oberlander, Jon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRENT LIMITATION; LANGUAGE MODEL; RANKING APPROACH; USER STUDY;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84858127578     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Shlomo Argamon, Sushant Dhawle, Moshe Koppel, and James W. Pennebaker. 2005. Lexical predictors of personality type. In Proceedings of the 2005 Joint Annual Meeting of the Interface and the Classification Society of North America.
2. Gene Ball and Jack Breese. 2000. Emotion and personality in a conversational agent. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, and E. Churchill, editors, Embodied Conversational Agents, pages 189-219. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
3. John A. Bateman and Cécile L. Paris. 2005. Adaptation to affective factors: architectural impacts for natural language generation and dialogue. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Adapting the Interaction Style to Affective Factors at the 10th International Conference on User Modeling (UM-05), Edinburgh, UK.
4. Allan Bell. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2):145-204.
5. Anja Belz. 2003. And now with feeling: Developments in emotional language generation. Technical Report ITRI-03-21, Information Technology Research Institute, University of Brighton, Brighton.
6. Susan E. Brennan. 1996. Lexical entrainment in spontaneous dialog. In Proceedings of the 1996 International Symposium on Spoken Dialogue (ISSD-96), pages 41-44, Philadelphia, PA.
7. Carsten Brockmann, Amy Isard, Jon Oberlander, and Michael White. 2005. Modelling alignment for affective dialogue. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Adapting the Interaction Style to Affective Factors at the 10th International Conference on User Modeling (UM-05), Edinburgh, UK.
8. Paul T. Costa and Robert R. McCrae, 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9. Jean-Marc Dewaele and Adrian Furnham. 1999. Extraversion: The unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning, 49:509-544.
10. Mary Ellen Foster and Michael White. 2004. Techniques for Text Planning with XSLT. In Proc. of the 4th NLPXML Workshop.
11. Simon Garrod and Gwyneth Doherty. 1994. Conversation, co-ordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53(3):181-215.
12. Patrick Gebhard. 2005. Alma: a layered model of affect. In AAMAS '05: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 29-36, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press.
13. Alastair J. Gill, Annabel J. Harrison, and Jon Oberlander. 2004. Interpersonality: Individual differences and interpersonal priming. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 464-469.
14. Eduard Hovy. 1990. Pragmatics and natural language generation. Artificial Intelligence, 43.
15. Amy Isard, Carsten Brockmann, and Jon Oberlander. 2005. Re-creating dialogues from a corpus. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Using Corpora for Natural Language Generation at Corpus Linguistics 2005 (CL-05), pages 7-12, Birmingham, UK.
16. Adam S. Kahn. 2006. Master's thesis, Stanford University.
17. A. Bryan Loyall and Joseph Bates. 1997. Personalityrich believable agents that use language. In J. Lewis and B. Hayes-Roth, editors, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents'97). ACM Press.
18. Gerald Matthews, Ian J. Deary, and Martha C. Whiteman. 2003. Personality Traits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edition.
19. Youngme Moon and Clifford Nass. 1996. How "real" are computer personalities? Communication Research, 23:651-674.
20. Clifford Nass and Kwan Min Lee. 2000. Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? an experimental test of similarity-attraction. In Proceedings of CHI 2000, The Hague, Amsterdam, 2000, pages 329-336.
21. Scott Nowson. 2006. The Language of Weblogs: A study of genre and individual differences. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
22. Jon Oberlander and Scott Nowson. 2006. Whose thumb is it anyway? Classifying author personality from weblog text. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL- 06: 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Sydney.
23. Daniel S. Paiva and Roger Evans. 2004. A framework for stylistically controlled generation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pages 120-129.
24. James W. Pennebaker and Laura King. 1999. Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77:1296-1312.
25. James W. Pennebaker, Martha E. Francis, and Roger J. Booth. 2001. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2001. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
26. James W. Pennebaker, Matthias R. Mehl, and Kate G. Neiderhoffer. 2002. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54:547-577. (Pubitemid 37417505)
27. Martin J. Pickering and Holly P. Branigan. 1998. The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4):633-651. (Pubitemid 128343563)
28. Martin J. Pickering and Simon Garrod. 2004. Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27:169-225.
29. Paul Piwek and Kees van Deemter. 2003. Dialogue as discourse: Controlling global properties of scripted dialogue. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Natural Language Generation in Spoken and Written Dialogue.
30. Ehud Reiter and Somayajulu Sripada. 2004. Contextual influences on near-synonym choice. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pages 161-170.
31. Thomas Rist, Elisabeth André, and Stephan Baldes. 2003. A flexible platform for building applications with life-like characters. In IUI '03: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 158-165, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press.
32. Klaus Scherer. 1979. Personality markers in speech. In K. R. Scherer and H. Giles, editors, Social Markers in Speech, pages 147-209. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Andreas Stolcke, Harry Bratt, John Butzberger, Horacio Franco, Venkata Ramana Rao Gadde, Madelaine Plauché, Colleen Richey, Elizabeth Shriberg, Kemal Sönmez, Fuliang Weng, and Jing Zheng. 2000. The SRI March 2000 Hub-5 conversational speech transcription system. In Proceedings of the 2000 Speech Transcription Workshop, College Park, MD.
34. Andreas Stolcke. 2002. SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP-02), pages 901-904, Denver, CO.
35. Sebastian Varges. 2005. Spatial descriptions as referring expressions in the MapTask domain. In Proceedings of the 10th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation.
36. Marilyn A. Walker, Janet E. Cahn, and Steve J. Whittaker. 1997. Improvising linguistic style: Social and affective bases for agent personality. In J. Lewis and B. Hayes-Roth, editors, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents'97), pages 96-105. ACM Press.
37. Michael White. 2004. Reining in CCG Chart Realization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pages 182-191.
38. Michael White. 2006. Efficient Realization of Coordinate Structures in Combinatory Categorial Grammar. Research on Language & Computation, online first, March.