Paraphrase generation as monolingual translation: Data and evaluation

INLG 2010 - Proceedings of the 6th International Natural Language Generation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 203-207

  Wubben, Sander ^a   Van Den Bosch, Antal ^a   Krahmer, Emiel ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC GENERATION; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; SUBSTITUTION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84858120435     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. 2005. METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, pages 65-72, June.
2. Regina Barzilay and Lillian Lee. 2003. Learning to paraphrase: an unsupervised approach using multiple-sequence alignment. In NAACL '03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, pages 16-23.
3. Chris Callison-Burch, Philipp Koehn, and Miles Osborne. 2006. Improved statistical machine translation using paraphrases. In Proceedings of the main conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 17-24.
4. Chris Callison-Burch, Trevor Cohn, and Mirella Lapata. 2008. Parametric: an automatic evaluation metric for paraphrasing. In COLING '08: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 97-104.
5. Walter Daelemans, Jakub Zavrel, Peter Berck, and Steven Gillis. 1996. Mbt: A memory-based part of speech tagger-generator. In Proc. of Fourth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 14-27.
6. Walter Daelemans, Anja Hothker, and Erik Tjong Kim Sang. 2004. Automatic sentence simplification for subtitling in dutch and english. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1045-1048.
7. Bill Dolan, Chris Quirk, and Chris Brockett. 2004. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: exploiting massively parallel news sources. In COLING '04: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics, page 350.
8. Christiane Fellbaum. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, May.
9. David Kauchak and Regina Barzilay. 2006. Paraphrasing for automatic evaluation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Main Conference, pages 455-462, June.
10. Kevin Knight and Daniel Marcu. 2002. Summarization beyond sentence extraction: a probabilistic approach to sentence compression. Artif. Intell., 139(1):91-107. (Pubitemid 34807822)
11. Philipp Koehn, Hieu Hoang, Alexandra Birch, Chris C. Burch, Marcello Federico, Nicola Bertoldi, Brooke Cowan,Wade Shen, Christine Moran, Richard Zens, Chris Dyer, Ondrej Bojar, Alexandra Constantin, and Evan Herbst. 2007. Moses: Open source toolkit for statistical machine translation. In ACL.
12. Dekang Lin and Patrick Pantel. 2001. Dirt: Discovery of inference rules from text. In KDD '01: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 323-328.
13. Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Proc. ACL workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out, page 10.
14. Rani Nelken and Stuart M. Shieber. 2006. Towards robust context-sensitive sentence alignment for monolingual corpora. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-06), 3-7 April.
15. Franz J. Och and Hermann Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Comput. Linguist., 29(1):19-51, March. (Pubitemid 37049767)
16. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, ToddWard, andWei- Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In ACL '02: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311-318.
17. Chris Quirk, Chris Brockett, and William Dolan. 2004. Monolingual machine translation for paraphrase generation. In Dekang Lin and Dekai Wu, editors, Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pages 142-149, July.
18. Stefan Riezler, Alexander Vasserman, Ioannis Tsochantaridis, Vibhu O. Mittal, and Yi Liu. 2007. Statistical machine translation for query expansion in answer retrieval. In ACL.
19. Grazia Russo-Lassner, Jimmy Lin, and Philip Resnik. 2006. A paraphrase-based approach to machine translation evaluation. Technical report, University of Maryland, College Park.
20. Andreas Stolcke. 2002. Srilm - an extensible language modeling toolkit. In In Proc. Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing, pages 901-904.
21. SanderWubben, Antal van den Bosch, Emiel Krahmer, and Erwin Marsi. 2009. Clustering and matching headlines for automatic paraphrase acquisition. In ENLG '09: Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 122-125.
22. Liang Zhou, Chin-Yew Lin, and Eduard Hovy. 2006. Re-evaluating machine translation results with paraphrase support. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 77-84, July.