The size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: A randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 365-370

  López Gil, Maite ^a   Mantilla, Ignacio ^a   Blanco, Teresa ^a   Teigell, Enrique ^a   Hervias, Mónica ^a   Fernández López, Rosa ^a  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

airway technique, complications; equipment Proseal laryngeal mask airway, Classic laryngeal mask airway; infants

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY TIME; AIRWAY TUBE; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; AUDIBLE LEAK; BLOOD STAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMAN; INFANT; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NEWBORN; OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; TUBE;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; FEMALE; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INSUFFLATION; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; METHYL ETHERS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SAMPLE SIZE; VOMITING;

EID: 84858079782     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03801.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. LMA North America Inc. LMA ProSeal™ Instruction Manual, 1st Edn. San Diego: LMA North America Inc., 2000.
2. Brimacombe J, Keller C,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 104-109. (Pubitemid 30436683)
3. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B,. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal with the Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 289-295. (Pubitemid 34121735)
4. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ,. The LMA 'ProSeal' a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 650-654. (Pubitemid 30229613)
5. Howarth A, Brimacombe J, Keller C,. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 624-627. (Pubitemid 35189864)
6. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Vosoba Judd D,. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25-29. (Pubitemid 38031650)
7. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, et al. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1017-1207.
8. Keller C, Brimacombe J,. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 262-266. (Pubitemid 30601618)
9. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Pediatr Anesth 2005; 15: 229-234. (Pubitemid 40364749)
10. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, et al. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 528-531.
11. Goldmann K, Jakob C,. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 385-389. (Pubitemid 40352863)
12. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Gasco C,. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and the Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 827-830. (Pubitemid 41762386)
13. 1/2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airways in infants less than six months undergoing inguinal herniotomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 998-1001.
14. Wheeler M,. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 120 pediatric surgical patients: a prospective evaluation of characteristics and performance. Pediatr Anesth 2006; 16: 297-301.
15. Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H,. The size 1.5 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 405-410. (Pubitemid 43152586)
16. Micaglio M, Parotto M,. Size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in neonates. Letters to the editor. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 405-410.
17. Trevisanuto D, Micaglio M, Ferrarese P, et al. The laryngeal mask airway: potential applications in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: F485-F489. (Pubitemid 39472314)
18. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C,. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2001; 11: 319-321. (Pubitemid 32434158)
19. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kurian S, et al. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 127-129. (Pubitemid 34048571)
20. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Puehringer F,. A fibreoptic scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices. Interobserver variability and a comparison between the standard, flexible and intubating laryngeal mask airways. AINS 2000; 35: 692-694.
21. Brimacombe J,. ProSeal LMA for ventilation and airway protection. In:, Brimacombe J, ed. Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia. Principles and Practice, 2nd edn. London: WB Saunders, 2005: pp. 505-538.
22. Latorre F, Eberle B, Weiler N, et al. Laryngeal mask airway position and the risk of gastric insufflation. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 867-871. (Pubitemid 28177747)
23. Micaglio M, Bonato R, De Nardin M, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airways in anaesthetized neonates and infants. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 263-267.
24. Galante D,. Transesophageal Doppler probe and proseal laryngeal mask airway. A new technique for probe insertion in pediatric anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 348.