Erratum: Invertebrate feeding and emergence timing vary among streams along a gradient of riparian forest composition. Freshwater Biology, 57, 759-772. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02740.x;Invertebrate feeding and emergence timing vary among streams along a gradient of riparian forest composition

Freshwater Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 759-772

  Kominoski, John S ^b   Larrañaga, Santiago ^a   Richardson, John S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coniferous; Deciduous; Diversity; Stable isotopes; Stoichiometry

Indexed keywords

ALNUS; ALNUS RUBRA; CHLOROPERLIDAE; CONIUM; EPHEMEROPTERA; HEXAPODA; INVERTEBRATA; LEPIDOSTOMA UNICOLOR; PARALEPTOPHLEBIA GREGALIS; PLECOPTERA; TRICHOPTERA; TSUGA; TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA;

EID: 84858072256     PISSN: 00465070     EISSN: 13652427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02814.x     Document Type: Erratum

References (54)

1. 15N enrichment. Limnology & Oceanography, 45, 601-607.
2. APHA (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
3. Arsuffi T.L. & Suberkropp K. (1985) Selective feeding by stream caddisfly (Trichoptera) detritivores on leaves with fungal-colonized patches. Oikos, 45, 50-58.
4. Baxter C., Fausch K.D. & Saunders W.C. (2005) Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones. Freshwater Biology, 50, 201-220.
5. 13C lignin and its implications for stable isotope studies. Nature, 329, 708-710.
6. Cross W.F., Benstead J.P., Rosemond A.D. & Wallace J.B. (2003) Consumer-resource stoichiometry in detritus-based streams. Ecology Letters, 6, 721-732.
7. Cross W.F., Benstead J.P., Frost P.C. & Thomas S.A. (2005) Ecological stoichiometry in freshwater benthic systems: recent progress and perspectives. Freshwater Biology, 50, 1895-1912.
8. Ellison A.M., Bank M.S., Clinton B.D., Colburn E.A., Elliott K., Ford C.R. et al. (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 479-486.
9. Elser J.J., Sterner R.W., Gorokhova E. et al. (2000) Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 3, 540-550.
10. Elton C.S. (1927) Animal Ecology. Macmillan Co., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
11. England L.E. & Rosemond A.D. (2004) Small reductions in forest cover weaken terrestrial-aquatic linkages in headwater streams. Freshwater Biology, 49, 721-734.
12. Evans-White M.A., Steltzer R.S. & Lamberti G.A. (2005) Taxonomic and regional patterns in benthic macroinvertebrate elemental composition in streams. Freshwater Biology, 50, 1786-1799.
13. Frost P.C., Benstead J.P., Cross W.F. et al. (2006) Threshold elemental ratios of carbon and phosphorus in aquatic consumers. Ecology Letters, 9, 774-779.
14. Giardina C.P., Huffman S., Binkley D. & Caldwell B.A. (1995) Alders increase soil phosphorus availability in a Douglas-fir plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25, 1652-1657.
15. Groom A.P. & Hildrew A.G. (1989) Food quality for detritivores in streams of contrasting pH. Journal of Animal Ecology, 58, 863-881.
16. Guenet B., Danger M., Abbadie L. & Lacroix G. (2010) Priming effect: bridging the gap between terrestrial and aquatic ecology. Ecology, 91, 2850-2861.
17. Gulis V. & Suberkropp K. (2003) Leaf litter decomposition and microbial activity in nutrient-enriched and unaltered reaches of a headwater stream. Freshwater Biology, 48, 123-134.
18. Hieber M. & Gessner M.O. (2002) Contribution of stream detritivores, fungi, and bacteria to leaf breakdown based on biomass estimates. Ecology, 83, 1026-1038.
19. Hladyz S., Gessner M.O., Giller P.S. et al. (2009) Resource quality and stoichiometry constraints on stream ecosystem functioning. Freshwater Biology, 54, 957-970.
20. Kiffney P.M., Richardson J.R. & Feller M.C. (2000) Fluvial and epilithic organic matter dynamics in headwater streams of southwestern British Columbia, Canada. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 149, 109-129.
21. Kominoski J.S. & Pringle C.P. (2009) Resource-consumer diversity: testing the effects of leaf litter diversity on stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology, 54, 1461-1473.
22. Kominoski J.S., Marczak L.B. & Richardson J.S. (2011) Riparian forest composition affects stream litter decomposition despite similar microbial and invertebrate communities. Ecology, 92, 151-159.
23. Likens G.E. & Bormann F.H. (1974) Linkages between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. BioScience, 24, 447-456.
24. Marczak L.B. & Richardson J.S. (2007) Spiders and subsidies: results from the riparian zone of a coastal temperate rainforest. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 687-694.
25. Marczak L.B. & Richardson J.S. (2008) Growth and development rates in a riparian spider are altered by asynchrony between the timing and amount of a resource subsidy. Oecologia, 156, 249-258.
26. Marczak L.B., Thompson R.M. & Richardson J.S. (2007) A meta-analysis of the role of trophic position, habitat type and habitat productivity in determining the food web effects of resource subsidies. Ecology, 88, 140-148.
27. McArthur M.D. & Richardson J.S. (2002) Microbial utilization of dissolved organic carbon from riparian litterfall. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59, 1668-1676.
28. McCutchan J.H., Lewis W.M., Kendall C. & McGrath C.C. (2003) Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. Oikos, 102, 378-390.
29. Merritt R.W., Cummins K.W. & Berg M.B. (2008) An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th edn. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque.
30. Nakano S. & Murakami M. (2001) Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 166-170.
31. Petersen I. & Hildrew A.G. (2003) Emergence of Leuctra nigra (Plecoptera) from a southern English stream. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 158, 185-195.
32. Peterson B.J. & Fry B. (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 293-320.
33. Piccolo J.J. & Wipfli M.S. (2002) Does red alder (Alnus rubra) in upland forests elevate macroinvertebrate and detritus export from streams to downstream habitats in southeastern Alaska? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59, 503-513.
34. Polis G.A., Anderson W.B. & Holt R.D. (1997) Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 289-316.
35. Polis G.A., Power M.E. & Huxel G.R. (2004) Food Webs at the Landscape Scale. University of Chicago, Chicago.
36. Power M.E. (2001) Prey exchange between a stream and its forested watershed elevates predator densities in both habitats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 14-15.
37. Prescott C.E., Vesterdal L., Preston C.M. & Simard S.W. (2004) Influence of initial chemistry on decomposition of foliar litter in contrasting forest types in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 1714-1729.
38. Richardson J.S. (1991) Seasonal food limitation of detritivores in a montane stream: anexperimentaltest. Ecology, 72, 873-887.
39. Richardson J.S. (1992) Coarse particulate detritus dynamics in small, montane streams of southwestern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 337-346.
40. Richardson J.S. (2001) Life cycle phenology of common detritivores from a temperate rainforest stream. Hydrobiologia, 455, 87-95.
41. Richardson J.S., Shaughnessy C.R. & Harrison P.G. (2004) Litter breakdown and invertebrate association with three types of leaves in a temperate rainforest stream. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 159, 309-325.
42. Richardson J.S., Zhang Y. & Marczak L.B. (2010) Resource subsidies across the land-freshwater interface and responses in recipient communities. River Research and Applications, 26, 55-66.
43. Rounick J.S. & Winterbourn M.J. (1986) Stable carbon isotopes and carbon flow in ecosystems. BioScience, 36, 171-177.
44. Sabo J.L. & Power M.E. (2002) River-watershed exchange: effects of riverine subsidies on riparian lizards and their terrestrial prey. Ecology, 83, 1860-1869.
45. Sabo J.L., Sponseller R., Dixon M. et al. (2005) Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species. Ecology, 86, 56-62.
46. Sanzone D.M., Meyer J.L., Marti E. et al. (2003) Carbon and nitrogen transfer from a desert stream to riparian predators. Oecologia, 134, 238-250.
47. Small G.E. & Pringle C.M. (2010) Deviation from strict homeostasis across multiple trophic levels in an invertebrate consumer assemblage exposed to high chronic phosphorus enrichment in a Neotropical stream. Oecologia, 162, 581-590.
48. Sterner R.W. & Elser J.J. (2002) Ecological Stoichiometry, from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University, Princeton.
49. Tibbets T.M. & Molles M.C. (2005) C:N:P stoichiometry of dominant riparian trees and arthropods along the Middle Rio Grande. Freshwater Biology, 50, 1882-1894.
50. Wallace J.B., Eggert S.L., Meyer J.L. & Webster J.R. (1999) Effects of resource limitation on a detrital-based ecosystem. Ecological Monographs, 69, 409-442.
51. 15N of locusts and their biochemical components. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 2903-2911.
52. Webster J.R., Meyer J.L., Wallace J.B. & Benfield E.F. (1997) Organic matter dynamics in Hugh Wjite Creek, Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16, 74-78.
53. Wipfli M.S. & Musselwhite J. (2004) Density of red alder (Alnus rubra) in headwaters influences invertebrate and detritus subsidies to downstream fish habitats in Alaska. Hydrobiologia, 520, 153-163.
54. Yang L.H. & Naeem S. (2008) The ecology of resource pulses. Ecology, 89, 619-620.