Robotic sacral hysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 114-117

  Vitobello, Domenico ^a   Siesto, Gabriele ^a   Bulletti, Cinzia ^a  

^a HUMANITAS CLINICAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Italy)

Author keywords

Colpohysteropexy; POP; Robot assisted laparoscopy; Uterus preservation

Indexed keywords

TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

COLPOHYSTEROPEXY; FOLLOW UP; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS SURGERY; SURGICAL SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL ASPECTS; UTERUS PRESERVATION;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE TRAINING; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIS SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; ROBOTIC SACRAL HYSTEROPEXY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84858005670     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.447     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 501-506.
2. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 885-888.
3. Price N, Slack A, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 117: 62-68.
4. Wallner C. Buttock pain after sacrospinous hysteropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 19: 1729-1730author reply 1731.
5. Dietz V, Huisman M, de Jong JM, et al. Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19: 747-752.
6. Krause HG, Goh JT, Sloane K, et al. Laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006; 17: 378-31.
7. Diwan A, Rardin CR, Kohli N. Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004; 15: 286-292.
8. van Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CI, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003; 14: 350-355.
9. Maher CF, Carey MP, Murray CJ. Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 1010-1014.
10. Busby G, Broome J. Successful pregnancy outcome following laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for second degree uterine prolapse. Gynecol Surg 2010; 7: 271-273.
11. Kenngott HG, Muller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, et al. Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2008; 17: 160-167.
12. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodynam 2002; 21: 167-178.
13. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 2010; 21: 5-26.
14. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodynam 2002; 21: 261-274.
15. Salvatore S, Athanasiou S, Digesu GA, et al. Identification of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence. Neurourol Urodynam 2009; 29: 301-304.
16. Passerotti CC, Passerotti AM, Dall'Oglio MF, et al. Comparing the quality of the suture anastomosis and the learning curves associated with performing open, freehand, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a swine animal model. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 576-586.