Novel error propagation approach for reducing H2S/O2 reaction mechanism

Applied Energy

Volumn 93, Issue , 2012, Pages 116-124

  Selim, H ^a   Gupta, A K ^a   Sassi, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Claus process; Hydrogen sulfide treatment; Reaction mechanism reduction; Sulfur recovery

Indexed keywords

ENERGY RESOURCES; TECHNOLOGY;

CLAUS PROCESS; COMBUSTION PRODUCTS; ELEMENTARY REACTION; ERROR PROPAGATION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; HYDROGEN SULFIDE TREATMENT; IGNITION DELAY TIME; MECHANISTIC PATHWAYS; OXYGEN MOLE-FRACTION; REACTION CONDITIONS; REACTION MECHANISM; REACTION PROGRESS; REDUCED MECHANISMS; REDUCTION STRATEGY; SULFUR RECOVERY; TRACK CHANGES;

HYDROGEN;

FRACTIONATION; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; OXYGEN; REACTION KINETICS; SULFIDE;

EID: 84857995780     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.047     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. El-Bishtawi R., Haimour N. Claus recycle with double combustion process. Fuel Process Technol 2004, 86(3):245-260.
2. Larraz R. Influence of fractal pore structure in Claus catalyst performance. Chem Eng J 2002, 86(3):309-317.
3. Mora R.L. Sulfur condensation influence in Claus catalyst performance. J Hazard Mater 2000, 79(1-2):103-115.
4. Monnery W.D., Hawboldt K.A., Pollock A., Svrcek W.Y. New experimental data and kinetic rate expression for Claus reaction. Chem Eng Sci 2000, 55(21):5141-5148.
5. Zagoruiko A.N., Matros Y.S. Mathematical modeling of Claus reactors undergoing sulfur condensation and evaporation. Chem Eng J 2002, 87(1):73-88.
6. 2-Ar mixtures. J Chem Phys 1967, 47(8):2865-2871.
7. Frenklach M., Lee J.H., White J.N., Gardnier W.C. Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide. Combust Flame 1981, 41:1-16.
8. 2 and NO on CO oxidation under post-flame conditions. Int J Chem Kinet 1996, 28:773-790.
9. 2 mixtures. J Chem Kinet 2003, 35:564-575.
10. 2. Combust Flame 2001, 127:2234-2251.
11. 2: a kinetic and quantum chemistry study of the potential energy surface. J Phys Chem A 2005, 109(6):1057-1062.
12. 2S pyrolysis and re-association. Chem Energy Sci 2000, 55(5):957-966.
13. 2 flames. Combust Flame 1987, 69:125-139.
14. Blitz M.A., Mckee K.W., Pilling M.J. Temperature dependence of the reaction of OH with SO. Proc Combust Inst 2000, 28:2491-2497.
15. Hughes K.J., Tomlin A.S., Dupont A., Pourkashanian M. Experimental and modelling study of sulfur and nitrogen doped premixed methane flames at low pressure. Faraday Discuss 2001, 119:337-352.
16. 2 System. Proc Combust Inst 2002, 29(2):2431-2437.
17. Leeds University, Sulfur mechanism extension to the leeds methane mechanism; May 2002. http://www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/combustion/sox.htm.
18. Cerru F.G., Kronenburg A., Lindstedt R.P. Systematically reduced chemical mechanism for sulfur oxidation and pyrolysis. Combust Flame 2006, 146(3):437-455.
19. Cerru F.G., Kronenburg A., Lindstedt R.P. A comparison of detailed and reduced chemical mechanism for sulphur oxidation. Proc Eur Combust Meet 2005.
20. 2S based on direct examination of the key reaction. Int J Chem Kinet 1997, 29:57-66.
21. Pepiot-Desjardins P., Pitsch H. An efficient error-propagation-based method for large chemical kinetics mechanism. Combust Flame 2008, 154(1-2):67-81.
22. Lu T., Law C.K. Linear time reduction of large kinetic mechanism with directed relation graph: n-Heptane and iso-octane. Combust Flame 2006, 144:24-36.
23. Kohl A., Nielsen R. Gas Purification 1997, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX, ISBN 0-88415-220-0, 1997. 5th ed.
24. 2S-containing gases: a review of microbiological Alternatives. Enzyme Microb Technol 1995, 17(1):2-10.
25. Selim H, Gupta AK, Sassi M. Acid gas composition effects on the reactor temperature in Claus reactor. In: 6th AIAA international energy conversion engineering conference (IECEC), Cleveland, OH; July 28-30, 2008, AIAA 2008-5797.
26. Selim H, Gupta AK, Sassi M. Reduced mechanism for hydrogen sulfide oxidation. In: 47th AIAA aerospace sciences conference, Orlando, FL; January 5-8, 2009, Paper No. AIAA-2009-1392.