Making sense of technological frames: Promise, progress, and potential

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 143, Issue , 2004, Pages 473-492

  Davidson, Elizabeth ^a   Pai, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Information systems research; Qualitative research methods; Social cognition; Social construction of technology; Technological frames of reference

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ACTION RESEARCH; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS; QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS; SOCIAL COGNITION; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL FRAME; TECHNOLOGICAL FRAMES OF REFERENCES (TFR);

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 84857980459     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Avison, D.; Lau, F.; Myers, M.; and Nielsen, P. "Action Research," Communications of the ACM 42: 1, 1999, pp. 94-98.
2. Barrett, M. I. "Challenges of EDI Adoption for Electronic Trading in the London Insurance Market," European Journal of Information Systems 8: 1, 1999, pp. 1-15.
3. Bartunek, J. "Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order," Administrative Science Quarterly 29, 1984, pp. 355-372.
4. Bartunek, J., and Moch, M. "First Order, Second Order, and Third Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 23, 1987, pp. 483-500.
5. Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Anchor, 1967.
6. Bijker, W. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
7. Bijker, W.; Hughes, T.; and Pinch, T. The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.
8. Boland, Jr., R. "Control, Causality and Information Systems Requirements," Accounting, Organizations and Society 4: 4, 1979, pp. 259-272.
9. Boland, Jr., R. "The Process and Product of Systems Design," Management Science 24, 1978, pp. 887-898.
10. Bostrom, R., and Heinen, J. "MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective, Part I-The Causes," MIS Quarterly 1: 1, 1977, pp. 17-32.
11. Daft, R., and Weick, K. "Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretative Systems." Academy of Management Review 9: 2, 1984, pp. 284-295.
12. Dagwell, R., and Weber, R. "System Designers' User Models: A Comparative Study and Methodological Critique," Communications of the ACM 26: 11, 1983, pp. 987-997.
13. Davidson, E. "Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination" MIS Quarterly 26: 4, 2002, pp. 329-358.
14. Davis, F. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly 13: 3, 1989, pp. 318-340.
15. DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W. "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields," American Sociological Review 48, 1993, pp. 147-160.
16. Gallivan, M. "Meaning to Change: How Diverse Stakeholders Interpret Organizational Communication About Change Initiatives," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 44: 4, 2001, pp. 243-266.
17. Ginzberg, M. "Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions," Management Science 27: 4, 1981, pp. 459-478.
18. Gioia, D. "Symbols, Scripts, and Sensemaking: Creating Meaning in the Organizational Experience," in H. Sims Jr., D. Gioia, and Associates Eds., The Thinking Organization, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 49-74.
19. Goffman, I. Frame Analysis, New York: Harper, 1974.
20. Isabella, L. "Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events," Academy of Management Journal 33: 1, 1990, pp. 7-41.
21. Keil, M., and Robey, D. "Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the De-escalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action," Journal of Management Information Systems 15: 4, 1999, pp. 63-88.
22. Khoo, M. "Community Design of DLESE's Collections Review Policy: A Technological Frames Analysis," in Proceedings of the first ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Roanoke, VI, June 24-28, 2001.
23. Krackhardt, D. "Cognitive Social Structures," Social Networks 9, 1987, pp. 109-134.
24. Latour, B. Science in Action, Boston: Harvard University Press, 1987.
25. Lin, A., and Cornford, T. Framing Implementation Management in W. J. Orlikowski, S. Ang, P. Weill, H. C. Krcmar, and J. I. DeGross Eds., Proceedings of the 21 International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia, 2001, pp. 197-205.
26. Markus, M. L., and Bjørn-Andersen, N. "Power Over Users: Its Exercise by System Professionals," Communications of the ACM 30: 6, 1987, pp. 498-504.
27. McLoughlin, I.; Badham, R.; and Couchman, P. "Rethinking A-Political Process in Technological Change: Socio-Technical Configurations and Frames," Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12: 1, 2000, pp., 17-37.
28. Meyer, J., and Rowan B. "Institutional Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony," The American Journal of Sociology 83, 1977, pp. 340-363.
29. Orlikowski, W. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science 3: 2, 1992, pp. 398-427.
30. Orlikowski, W., and Gash, D. "Technology Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations," ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12: 2, 1994, pp. 174-207.
31. Porac, J.; Thomas, H.; and Baden-Fuller, C. "Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers," Journal of Management Studies 26: 4, 1989, pp. 397-416.
32. Powell, W., and Dimaggio, P. J. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
33. Sahay, S.; Palit, M.; and Robey, D. "A Relativist Approach to Studying the Social Construction of Information Technology," European Journal of Information Systems 3: 4, 1994, pp. 248-258.
34. nd ed., Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001.
35. h International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, GA, 1997, pp. 453-459.
36. Swanson, E., and Ramiller, N. "The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation," Organization Science 8: 5, 1997, pp. 458-474.
37. Tan, F. and Hunter, M. "The Repertory Grid Technique: A Method for the Study of Cognition in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly 26: 1, 2002, pp. 39-57.
38. Walsh, J. "Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane," Organization Science 6: 3, 1995, pp. 280-321.
39. Walsh, J., and Farley, L. "The Role of Negotiated Belief Structures in Strategy Making," Journal of Management 31, 1986, pp. 873-896.
40. Walsh, J.; Henderson, C; and Deighton, J. "Negotiated Belief Structures and Decision Performance: An Empirical Investigation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 42, 1988, pp. 194-216.
41. Walsham, G. "The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research," Information Systems Research 6, 1995, pp. 376-394.
42. Weick, K. The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
43. Weick, K, and Bougon, M. "Organizations as Cognitive Maps: Charting Ways to Success and Failure," in H. Sims Jr., D. Gioia, and Associates Eds., The Thinking Organization, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 102-135.