Magnetic resonance imaging in teenagers and young adults with limited haemophilic arthropathy: Baseline results from a prospective study

Haemophilia

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 926-930

  den Uijl, I E M ^a,b   De Schepper, A M A ^c   Camerlinck, M ^c   Grobbee, D E ^b   Fischer, K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Added value; Clinical function; Haemophilia; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiography

Indexed keywords

BLOOD CLOTTING FACTOR 8; HEMOSIDERIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ANKLE; KNEE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANKLE JOINT; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857973289     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: 13652516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02513.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Jansen NW, Roosendaal G, Lafeber FP. Understanding haemophilic arthropathy: an exploration of current open issues. Br J Haematol 2008; 143: 632-40.
2. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 149: 153-9.
3. Lundin B, Babyn P, Doria AS et al. Compatible scales for progressive and additive MRI assessments of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 109-15.
4. Feldman BM, Funk S, Lundin B, Doria AS, Ljung R, Blanchette V. Musculoskeletal measurement tools from the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG). Haemophilia 2008; 14(Suppl. 3): 162-9.
5. Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 535-44.
6. Hilliard P, Funk S, Zourikian N et al. Hemophilia joint health score reliability study. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 518-25.
7. Link TM, Sell CA, Masi JN et al. 3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology--ROC analysis in an experimental model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14: 63-70.
8. Masi JN, Sell CA, Phan C et al. Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model. Radiology 2005; 236: 140-50.
9. den Uijl IEM, De Schepper AMA, Grobbee DE, Fischer K. Evaluating therapy in hemophilia: development of an MRI protocol. J Thromb Haemost. 7s2, PP-WE-534. 2009; 7: 807-8.
10. Dobon M, Lucia JF, Aguilar C et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis and follow-up of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2003; 9: 76-85.
11. Pergantou H, Matsinos G, Papadopoulos A, Platokouki H, Aronis S. Comparative study of validity of clinical, X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging scores in evaluation and management of haemophilic arthropathy in children. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 241-7.
12. Lundin B, Ljung R, Pettersson H. MRI scores of ankle joints in children with haemophilia--comparison with clinical data. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 116-22.
13. Lutz AM, Seemayer C, Corot C et al. Detection of synovial macrophages in an experimental rabbit model of antigen-induced arthritis: ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 233: 149-57.
14. Kilcoyne RF, Lundin B, Pettersson H. Evolution of the imaging tests in hemophilia with emphasis on radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol 2006; 47: 287-96.
15. Funk MB, Schmidt H, Becker S et al. Modified magnetic resonance imaging score compared with orthopaedic and radiological scores for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2002; 8: 98-103.
16. Lundin B, Pettersson H, Ljung R. A new magnetic resonance imaging scoring method for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 383-9.
17. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 11: 88-94.
18. Doria AS. State-of-the-art imaging techniques for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy: present and future. Haemophilia 2010; 16(Suppl. 5): 107-14.
19. Moons KG, Grobbee DE. Diagnostic studies as multivariable, prediction research. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56: 337-8.